PRAME Expression in Recurrent/Persistent Melanocytic Nevi.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 DERMATOLOGY
Alison H Kucharik, Helana Ghali, Doniya Milani, Elizabeth Warbasse, Philippa Li, Sairekha Ravichandran, Paul Rodriguez-Waitkus, Wei-Shen Chen
{"title":"PRAME Expression in Recurrent/Persistent Melanocytic Nevi.","authors":"Alison H Kucharik, Helana Ghali, Doniya Milani, Elizabeth Warbasse, Philippa Li, Sairekha Ravichandran, Paul Rodriguez-Waitkus, Wei-Shen Chen","doi":"10.1097/DAD.0000000000003104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recurrent melanocytic nevi are benign melanocytic proliferations that occur after incomplete excision of a nevus. Their atypical clinical and histopathologic features complicate diagnosis, especially without knowledge of prior biopsy. The PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma) immunohistochemical stain has been increasingly used to support a diagnosis of melanoma, however, its utility in recurrent melanocytic nevi is not well established.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed PRAME expression in paired original and recurrent melanocytic nevi from 22 patients. Tissue sections underwent PRAME immunohistochemistry, evaluated by 2 dermatopathologists using 3 criteria: (1) staining intensity, (2) percentage of melanocytes with nuclear staining, and (3) a composite score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among original nevi, 81.8% had an intensity score of 0, 9.1% scored 1, 4.5% scored 2%, and 4.5% scored 3. Percentage positivity was 81.8% at score 0 and 18.2% at score 1. All had a negative composite score. Recurrent nevi showed similar results, with 81.8% intensity score 0, 9.1% score 1, 4.5% score 2, and 4.5% score 3. Percentage positivity was 81.8% at score 0 and 18.2% at score 1, with all patients scoring negative on the composite score.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PRAME expression remained consistent between original and recurrent nevi, with all patients showing negative composite scores. These findings support PRAME's utility in differentiating benign recurrent nevi from melanoma, even when histologic or clinical features raise concern. PRAME staining may enhance diagnostic confidence, reducing unnecessary procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":50967,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Dermatopathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Dermatopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DAD.0000000000003104","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recurrent melanocytic nevi are benign melanocytic proliferations that occur after incomplete excision of a nevus. Their atypical clinical and histopathologic features complicate diagnosis, especially without knowledge of prior biopsy. The PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma) immunohistochemical stain has been increasingly used to support a diagnosis of melanoma, however, its utility in recurrent melanocytic nevi is not well established.

Methods: We analyzed PRAME expression in paired original and recurrent melanocytic nevi from 22 patients. Tissue sections underwent PRAME immunohistochemistry, evaluated by 2 dermatopathologists using 3 criteria: (1) staining intensity, (2) percentage of melanocytes with nuclear staining, and (3) a composite score.

Results: Among original nevi, 81.8% had an intensity score of 0, 9.1% scored 1, 4.5% scored 2%, and 4.5% scored 3. Percentage positivity was 81.8% at score 0 and 18.2% at score 1. All had a negative composite score. Recurrent nevi showed similar results, with 81.8% intensity score 0, 9.1% score 1, 4.5% score 2, and 4.5% score 3. Percentage positivity was 81.8% at score 0 and 18.2% at score 1, with all patients scoring negative on the composite score.

Conclusions: PRAME expression remained consistent between original and recurrent nevi, with all patients showing negative composite scores. These findings support PRAME's utility in differentiating benign recurrent nevi from melanoma, even when histologic or clinical features raise concern. PRAME staining may enhance diagnostic confidence, reducing unnecessary procedures.

PRAME在复发性/持续性黑素细胞痣中的表达。
背景:复发性黑素细胞痣是良性的黑素细胞增生,发生在痣不完全切除后。他们的非典型临床和组织病理学特征使诊断复杂化,特别是没有事先活检的知识。PRAME(黑色素瘤中优先表达抗原)免疫组织化学染色越来越多地用于支持黑色素瘤的诊断,然而,其在复发性黑色素细胞痣中的应用尚未得到很好的证实。方法:我们分析了22例原黑素细胞痣和复发黑素细胞痣配对中PRAME的表达。组织切片进行PRAME免疫组化,由2名皮肤病理学家使用3个标准进行评估:(1)染色强度,(2)有核染色的黑素细胞百分比,(3)综合评分。结果:81.8%的原始痣强度评分为0分,9.1%为1分,4.5%为2%,4.5%为3分。0分阳性率为81.8%,1分阳性率为18.2%。所有人的综合得分都是负的。复发性痣强度评分0分为81.8%,1分为9.1%,2分为4.5%,3分为4.5%。0分时阳性率为81.8%,1分时阳性率为18.2%,综合评分均为阴性。结论:PRAME表达在原发痣和复发痣之间保持一致,所有患者的综合评分均为阴性。这些发现支持PRAME在区分良性复发痣和黑色素瘤方面的效用,即使在组织学或临床特征引起关注时也是如此。PRAME染色可以提高诊断的可信度,减少不必要的手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
453
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Dermatopathology offers outstanding coverage of the latest diagnostic approaches and laboratory techniques, as well as insights into contemporary social, legal, and ethical concerns. Each issue features review articles on clinical, technical, and basic science advances and illuminating, detailed case reports. With the The American Journal of Dermatopathology you''ll be able to: -Incorporate step-by-step coverage of new or difficult-to-diagnose conditions from their earliest histopathologic signs to confirmatory immunohistochemical and molecular studies. -Apply the latest basic science findings and clinical approaches to your work right away. -Tap into the skills and expertise of your peers and colleagues the world over peer-reviewed original articles, "Extraordinary cases reports", coverage of practical guidelines, and graphic presentations. -Expand your horizons through the Journal''s idea-generating forum for debating controversial issues and learning from preeminent researchers and clinicians
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信