Differences in professional help-seeking for mental health problems among migrants and non-migrants: Symptom severity, self-perceived mental health problem, and region of origin matter.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Melanie L Straiton, Samantha M Harris
{"title":"Differences in professional help-seeking for mental health problems among migrants and non-migrants: Symptom severity, self-perceived mental health problem, and region of origin matter.","authors":"Melanie L Straiton, Samantha M Harris","doi":"10.1177/14034948251362562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To examine differences in help-seeking for mental health problems among migrants and non-migrants in Norway and to consider the role of symptom severity, acknowledgement of a mental health problem and region of origin.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from a cross-sectional, online Norwegian Country Public Health Survey conducted in 2021. A total of 32,126 people, aged 18+ years, were included in the analyses, of which 8% were migrants. Around 60% of these were from countries within the European Economic Area, associated countries or the UK, USA, Canada, Australia and New Zealand (EEA+).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Migrants from non-EEA+ countries showed higher odds of having sought professional mental health help than non-migrants, but this difference attenuated when controlling for sociodemographic factors, psychological distress and self-reported depression. An interaction revealed that at higher, but not lower, levels of psychological distress, non-EEA+ migrants had significantly lower odds of having sought help. Moreover, a stratified analysis indicated that this applied only to those without self-reported depression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At high levels of psychological distress, people from non-EEA+ regions living in Norway may not be getting professional support for mental health problems to the same extent as EEA+ migrants and non-migrants. This may especially be the case for those who do not perceive their symptoms as a mental health problem. Consequently, improving the ability to recognise mental health problems may be a possible avenue for reducing the treatment gap for migrants with high symptom levels, though longitudinal studies would be required to confirm this.</p>","PeriodicalId":49568,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":"14034948251362562"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14034948251362562","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To examine differences in help-seeking for mental health problems among migrants and non-migrants in Norway and to consider the role of symptom severity, acknowledgement of a mental health problem and region of origin.

Methods: We used data from a cross-sectional, online Norwegian Country Public Health Survey conducted in 2021. A total of 32,126 people, aged 18+ years, were included in the analyses, of which 8% were migrants. Around 60% of these were from countries within the European Economic Area, associated countries or the UK, USA, Canada, Australia and New Zealand (EEA+).

Results: Migrants from non-EEA+ countries showed higher odds of having sought professional mental health help than non-migrants, but this difference attenuated when controlling for sociodemographic factors, psychological distress and self-reported depression. An interaction revealed that at higher, but not lower, levels of psychological distress, non-EEA+ migrants had significantly lower odds of having sought help. Moreover, a stratified analysis indicated that this applied only to those without self-reported depression.

Conclusions: At high levels of psychological distress, people from non-EEA+ regions living in Norway may not be getting professional support for mental health problems to the same extent as EEA+ migrants and non-migrants. This may especially be the case for those who do not perceive their symptoms as a mental health problem. Consequently, improving the ability to recognise mental health problems may be a possible avenue for reducing the treatment gap for migrants with high symptom levels, though longitudinal studies would be required to confirm this.

移民与非移民心理健康问题专业求助的差异:症状严重程度、自我认知心理健康问题和原籍地区问题
目的:研究挪威移徙者和非移徙者在寻求心理健康问题帮助方面的差异,并考虑症状严重程度、对心理健康问题的承认和原籍地区的作用。方法:我们使用了2021年进行的横断面在线挪威国家公共卫生调查的数据。共有32126名18岁以上的人被纳入分析,其中8%是移民。其中约60%来自欧洲经济区、联邦国或英国、美国、加拿大、澳大利亚和新西兰(EEA+)。结果:来自非欧洲经济区+国家的移民寻求专业心理健康帮助的几率高于非移民,但在控制了社会人口因素、心理困扰和自我报告的抑郁症后,这种差异减弱了。一项相互作用显示,在较高而不是较低的心理困扰水平上,非欧洲经济区+移民寻求帮助的几率明显较低。此外,一项分层分析表明,这只适用于那些没有自我报告抑郁的人。结论:在心理困扰程度较高的情况下,生活在挪威的非欧洲经济区+地区的人在心理健康问题上可能得不到与欧洲经济区+移民和非移民相同程度的专业支持。对于那些不认为自己的症状是精神健康问题的人来说,情况尤其如此。因此,提高识别精神健康问题的能力可能是缩小对症状严重的移徙者的治疗差距的一个可能途径,尽管需要进行纵向研究来证实这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
135
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Public Health is an international peer-reviewed journal which has a vision to: publish public health research of good quality; contribute to the conceptual and methodological development of public health; contribute to global health issues; contribute to news and overviews of public health developments and health policy developments in the Nordic countries; reflect the multidisciplinarity of public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信