Outcomes of gastrectomy in octogenarians and nonagenarians: a comparative analysis in the era of minimally invasive surgery.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Kenjiro Ishii, Yusuke Akimoto, Osahiko Hagiwara, Toshiyuki Enomoto, Takaharu Kiribayashi, Koji Asai, Takuya Nagata, Manabu Watanabe, Yoshihisa Saida
{"title":"Outcomes of gastrectomy in octogenarians and nonagenarians: a comparative analysis in the era of minimally invasive surgery.","authors":"Kenjiro Ishii, Yusuke Akimoto, Osahiko Hagiwara, Toshiyuki Enomoto, Takaharu Kiribayashi, Koji Asai, Takuya Nagata, Manabu Watanabe, Yoshihisa Saida","doi":"10.1186/s12893-025-03156-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As the population of Japan continues to age rapidly, an increasing number of patients aged ≥ 80 years are undergoing surgery for gastric cancer. Although minimally invasive techniques have improved surgical safety, operative risks in the super-elderly population (≥ 85 years) remain a significant concern.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, single-center study analyzed 72 patients aged ≥ 80 years who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer at our hospital between January 2014 and August 2024. Patients were stratified into two groups: the super-elderly group (≥ 85 years, n = 26) and the younger-elderly group (80-84 years, n = 46). Clinical characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 83.7 (range: 80-93) years. Comorbidities were common, particularly cardiovascular disease (19.4%) and diabetes mellitus (27.8%). Compared with the younger-elderly group, the super-elderly group had a longer preoperative hospital stay (5.8 vs. 4.5 days) but a shorter overall hospital stay (14.3 vs. 21.1 days). Minimally invasive surgery was less frequently performed in the super-elderly group (42.3% vs. 56.5%). Postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 2 occurred in 40.3% of all patients, with a lower incidence in the super-elderly group (34.6% vs. 43.5%). Mortality from non-cancer-related causes did not differ significantly between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With appropriate preoperative optimization, gastrectomy can be performed safely in patients aged ≥ 85 years. Individualized treatment strategies that account for comorbidities are essential for achieving favorable outcomes in this expanding population.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":"25 1","pages":"407"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12406342/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-03156-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As the population of Japan continues to age rapidly, an increasing number of patients aged ≥ 80 years are undergoing surgery for gastric cancer. Although minimally invasive techniques have improved surgical safety, operative risks in the super-elderly population (≥ 85 years) remain a significant concern.

Methods: This retrospective, single-center study analyzed 72 patients aged ≥ 80 years who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer at our hospital between January 2014 and August 2024. Patients were stratified into two groups: the super-elderly group (≥ 85 years, n = 26) and the younger-elderly group (80-84 years, n = 46). Clinical characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: The mean age was 83.7 (range: 80-93) years. Comorbidities were common, particularly cardiovascular disease (19.4%) and diabetes mellitus (27.8%). Compared with the younger-elderly group, the super-elderly group had a longer preoperative hospital stay (5.8 vs. 4.5 days) but a shorter overall hospital stay (14.3 vs. 21.1 days). Minimally invasive surgery was less frequently performed in the super-elderly group (42.3% vs. 56.5%). Postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 2 occurred in 40.3% of all patients, with a lower incidence in the super-elderly group (34.6% vs. 43.5%). Mortality from non-cancer-related causes did not differ significantly between the groups.

Conclusions: With appropriate preoperative optimization, gastrectomy can be performed safely in patients aged ≥ 85 years. Individualized treatment strategies that account for comorbidities are essential for achieving favorable outcomes in this expanding population.

微创手术时代八十多岁老人与九十多岁老人胃切除术的疗效比较分析。
背景:随着日本人口持续快速老龄化,越来越多≥80岁的患者接受胃癌手术治疗。尽管微创技术提高了手术安全性,但高龄人群(≥85岁)的手术风险仍然是一个值得关注的问题。方法:本回顾性单中心研究分析2014年1月至2024年8月在我院行胃癌切除术的72例年龄≥80岁的患者。患者分为两组:超老年组(≥85岁,n = 26)和中青年组(80-84岁,n = 46)。比较两组患者的临床特点、围手术期结局及术后并发症。结果的p值:平均年龄83.7岁(范围80 ~ 93岁)。合并症很常见,特别是心血管疾病(19.4%)和糖尿病(27.8%)。与低龄组相比,超高龄组术前住院时间较长(5.8天对4.5天),但总住院时间较短(14.3天对21.1天)。超高龄组的微创手术较少(42.3%对56.5%)。术后Clavien-Dindo≥2级并发症发生率为40.3%,超高龄组发生率较低(34.6%比43.5%)。非癌症相关原因的死亡率在两组之间没有显著差异。结论:术前适当优化,≥85岁患者可安全行胃切除术。考虑合并症的个体化治疗策略对于在这一不断扩大的人群中获得良好的结果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Surgery
BMC Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
391
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: BMC Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on surgical research, training, and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信