Reena Kishore, Sonam N Kille, Rhea Kishore, Rajesh Venkataram, Srividya Arjuna, Gunimala Chakraborty, Giridhar B Hosmane, Anirban Chakraborty
{"title":"Non-invasive profiling of <i>KRAS</i> mutations in lung cancer using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction.","authors":"Reena Kishore, Sonam N Kille, Rhea Kishore, Rajesh Venkataram, Srividya Arjuna, Gunimala Chakraborty, Giridhar B Hosmane, Anirban Chakraborty","doi":"10.4081/monaldi.2025.3190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With rising cases of lung cancer worldwide, liquid biopsies are becoming increasingly popular as clinically relevant potential non-invasive alternatives to tissue-based biopsies. The principle of partitioning utilized by the droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) makes it a highly sensitive technique for detecting rare tumor-derived mutations in blood. The presence of KRAS mutations is a negative prognostic marker for tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy in lung cancer; hence, profiling of major KRAS mutations before treatment is very crucial for the success of TKI therapy. This study was aimed at profiling three major KRAS mutations, namely G12D (GGT→GAT), G12V (GGT→GTT), and G13D (GGC→GAC) in lung cancer patients using ddPCR. ddPCR assays that rely on probe-based chemistry were standardized for KRAS G12D, KRAS G12V, and KRAS G13D mutations using cfDNA extracted from the patient's blood. To determine the concordance, blood-derived cfDNA and tumor DNA were compared using ddPCR. A positivity rate of 81.67% for KRAS mutations was observed in the cohort analyzed. KRAS mutations in the cfDNA from blood were effectively detected by ddPCR even at low fractional abundance. Moreover, a comparison of blood-derived cfDNA and tumor-derived genomic DNA-based analysis revealed a concordance of 66.67%, suggesting tumor heterogeneity as the probable reason for the lack of total concordance between the data. This study highlights the usefulness of ddPCR as a prospective clinical tool in oncology and liquid biopsy using blood cfDNA. It can be considered a better alternative to tissue biopsies and mutation profiling of candidate genes, particularly those that are linked to therapeutic response to TKIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51593,"journal":{"name":"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2025.3190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
With rising cases of lung cancer worldwide, liquid biopsies are becoming increasingly popular as clinically relevant potential non-invasive alternatives to tissue-based biopsies. The principle of partitioning utilized by the droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) makes it a highly sensitive technique for detecting rare tumor-derived mutations in blood. The presence of KRAS mutations is a negative prognostic marker for tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy in lung cancer; hence, profiling of major KRAS mutations before treatment is very crucial for the success of TKI therapy. This study was aimed at profiling three major KRAS mutations, namely G12D (GGT→GAT), G12V (GGT→GTT), and G13D (GGC→GAC) in lung cancer patients using ddPCR. ddPCR assays that rely on probe-based chemistry were standardized for KRAS G12D, KRAS G12V, and KRAS G13D mutations using cfDNA extracted from the patient's blood. To determine the concordance, blood-derived cfDNA and tumor DNA were compared using ddPCR. A positivity rate of 81.67% for KRAS mutations was observed in the cohort analyzed. KRAS mutations in the cfDNA from blood were effectively detected by ddPCR even at low fractional abundance. Moreover, a comparison of blood-derived cfDNA and tumor-derived genomic DNA-based analysis revealed a concordance of 66.67%, suggesting tumor heterogeneity as the probable reason for the lack of total concordance between the data. This study highlights the usefulness of ddPCR as a prospective clinical tool in oncology and liquid biopsy using blood cfDNA. It can be considered a better alternative to tissue biopsies and mutation profiling of candidate genes, particularly those that are linked to therapeutic response to TKIs.