Hospital Patient and Family Advisory Council Accelerators and Barriers: A Qualitative Study.

IF 1.8 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Patient Experience Pub Date : 2025-09-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23743735251367662
Barbara Lewis, Erika Marquez, Chris Cochran, Neeraj Bhandari, Soumya Upadhyay, Stowe Shoemaker
{"title":"Hospital Patient and Family Advisory Council Accelerators and Barriers: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Barbara Lewis, Erika Marquez, Chris Cochran, Neeraj Bhandari, Soumya Upadhyay, Stowe Shoemaker","doi":"10.1177/23743735251367662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patient and Family Advisory Councils (PFACs), comprised of patients who have used the hospital's services and their family members, provide hospitals with input on a wide range of initiatives. This qualitative study aims to uncover the facilitators that accelerate and the barriers that inhibit councils and provide hospitals with a blueprint to help them start and strengthen PFACs. Grounded in partnership theory, this exploratory qualitative study used a thematic analysis framework to examine first-person accounts of launching and sustaining a PFAC. The sampling was derived from three groups of potential participants. Participants from 20 hospitals and systems agreed to discuss their councils. Five key themes emerged from the interviews: The PFAC landscape improved after the pandemic, garnering support across the organization is necessary, recruiting ideal members and diversifying the council is critical, effective PFAC operation takes planning, and process and outcome measures can identify the impact and the value of PFACs. Evidence supports patient engagement through PFAC partnerships. However, to ensure a thriving PFAC, the councils require intentional design, diverse participation representing hospital demographics, broad organizational commitment, and systematic evaluation to ensure sustainability and meaningful impact on patient experience and care delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":45073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Experience","volume":"12 ","pages":"23743735251367662"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12402559/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735251367662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patient and Family Advisory Councils (PFACs), comprised of patients who have used the hospital's services and their family members, provide hospitals with input on a wide range of initiatives. This qualitative study aims to uncover the facilitators that accelerate and the barriers that inhibit councils and provide hospitals with a blueprint to help them start and strengthen PFACs. Grounded in partnership theory, this exploratory qualitative study used a thematic analysis framework to examine first-person accounts of launching and sustaining a PFAC. The sampling was derived from three groups of potential participants. Participants from 20 hospitals and systems agreed to discuss their councils. Five key themes emerged from the interviews: The PFAC landscape improved after the pandemic, garnering support across the organization is necessary, recruiting ideal members and diversifying the council is critical, effective PFAC operation takes planning, and process and outcome measures can identify the impact and the value of PFACs. Evidence supports patient engagement through PFAC partnerships. However, to ensure a thriving PFAC, the councils require intentional design, diverse participation representing hospital demographics, broad organizational commitment, and systematic evaluation to ensure sustainability and meaningful impact on patient experience and care delivery.

Abstract Image

医院病人和家属咨询委员会促进因素和障碍:一项定性研究。
病人和家属咨询委员会(PFACs)由使用医院服务的病人及其家属组成,向医院就一系列广泛的倡议提供投入。这项定性研究的目的是揭示加速理事会的促进因素和阻碍理事会的障碍,并为医院提供蓝图,帮助他们启动和加强pfac。在伙伴关系理论的基础上,本探索性质的研究使用主题分析框架来检查启动和维持PFAC的第一人称账户。样本来自三组潜在参与者。来自20家医院和系统的参与者同意讨论他们的理事会。访谈中出现了五个关键主题:大流行后,PFAC的情况有所改善,在整个组织内获得支持是必要的,招募理想的成员和使理事会多样化是关键的,PFAC的有效运作需要规划,过程和结果措施可以确定PFAC的影响和价值。证据支持患者通过PFAC伙伴关系参与。然而,为了确保PFAC的蓬勃发展,委员会需要有意识的设计,代表医院人口统计学的多样化参与,广泛的组织承诺和系统的评估,以确保可持续性和对患者体验和护理提供的有意义的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Experience
Journal of Patient Experience HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
178
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信