Opposing Relations of Reward Positivity with Anhedonia and Threat Sensitivity: Implications for Differential Dimensional Diagnosis.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Colin B Bowyer, Pablo Ribes-Guardiola, Keanan J Joyner, Christopher J Patrick
{"title":"Opposing Relations of Reward Positivity with Anhedonia and Threat Sensitivity: Implications for Differential Dimensional Diagnosis.","authors":"Colin B Bowyer, Pablo Ribes-Guardiola, Keanan J Joyner, Christopher J Patrick","doi":"10.1177/21677026241292049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Given the substantial symptom overlap between anxiety and depressive disorders, researchers have sought to develop approaches for better differentiating these subdimensions of internalizing psychopathology. Neurophysiological indices of biobehavioral processes specific to either subdimension may provide a means for doing so. Here, we report evidence for opposing associations of a well-established neural indicator of reward responsiveness - the reward positivity (RewP) - with trait indices of depressive and phobic fear pathology. We show that these relationships were strengthened when controlling for their shared variance via regression modeling. Additionally, structural equation modeling revealed that broad negative affectivity (NA) constituted the shared variance between the two trait indices. Our findings point to the potential use of reduced RewP to improve differential diagnosis of depressive versus phobic fear conditions. They also indicate that variance shared between conditions of these types may operate to obscure their observed associations with neural indicators of core processes unique to each.</p>","PeriodicalId":54234,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychological Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12404276/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychological Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026241292049","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given the substantial symptom overlap between anxiety and depressive disorders, researchers have sought to develop approaches for better differentiating these subdimensions of internalizing psychopathology. Neurophysiological indices of biobehavioral processes specific to either subdimension may provide a means for doing so. Here, we report evidence for opposing associations of a well-established neural indicator of reward responsiveness - the reward positivity (RewP) - with trait indices of depressive and phobic fear pathology. We show that these relationships were strengthened when controlling for their shared variance via regression modeling. Additionally, structural equation modeling revealed that broad negative affectivity (NA) constituted the shared variance between the two trait indices. Our findings point to the potential use of reduced RewP to improve differential diagnosis of depressive versus phobic fear conditions. They also indicate that variance shared between conditions of these types may operate to obscure their observed associations with neural indicators of core processes unique to each.

奖励积极性与快感缺乏症和威胁敏感性的对立关系:对鉴别维度诊断的意义。
考虑到焦虑和抑郁障碍之间的实质症状重叠,研究人员已经寻求开发方法来更好地区分内化精神病理学的这些子维度。特定于任何子维度的生物行为过程的神经生理学指标可能提供这样做的手段。在这里,我们报告了奖励反应的一个公认的神经指标-奖励积极性(RewP) -与抑郁和恐惧病理的特征指数的相反关联的证据。我们表明,当通过回归建模控制它们的共同方差时,这些关系得到了加强。此外,结构方程模型显示,广义负向情感(NA)构成了两个性状指标之间的共有方差。我们的研究结果指出,降低RewP的潜在用途是改善抑郁与恐惧条件的鉴别诊断。他们还指出,这些类型的条件之间共享的差异可能会使它们与每个独特的核心过程的神经指标的观察关联变得模糊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Psychological Science
Clinical Psychological Science Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
2.10%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: The Association for Psychological Science’s journal, Clinical Psychological Science, emerges from this confluence to provide readers with the best, most innovative research in clinical psychological science, giving researchers of all stripes a home for their work and a place in which to communicate with a broad audience of both clinical and other scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信