Developing and validating a computed tomography radiomics strategy to predict lymph node metastasis in pancreatic cancer.

IF 1.5 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Shuai Ren, Bin Qin, Marcus J Daniels, Liang Zeng, Ying Tian, Zhong-Qiu Wang
{"title":"Developing and validating a computed tomography radiomics strategy to predict lymph node metastasis in pancreatic cancer.","authors":"Shuai Ren, Bin Qin, Marcus J Daniels, Liang Zeng, Ying Tian, Zhong-Qiu Wang","doi":"10.4329/wjr.v17.i8.109373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is a key prognostic factor in pancreatic cancer (PC). Accurate preoperative prediction of LNM remains challenging. Radiomics offers a noninvasive method to extract quantitative imaging features that may aid in predicting LNM.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the potential value of a computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics model in prediction of LNM in PC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed on 168 pathologically confirmed PC patients who underwent contrast-enhanced-CT. Among them, 107 cases had no LNM, while 61 cases had confirmed LNM. These patients were randomly divided into a training cohort (<i>n</i> = 135) and a validation cohort (<i>n</i> = 33). A total of 792 radiomics features were extracted, comprising 396 features from the arterial phase and another 396 from the portal venous phase. The Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator methods were used for feature selection and Radiomics model construction. The receiver operating characteristic curve was employed to assess the diagnostic potential of the model, and DeLong test was used to compare the area under the curve (AUC) values of the model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six radiomics features from the arterial phase and nine from the portal venous phase were selected. The Radscore model demonstrated strong predictive performance for LNM in both the training and test cohorts, with AUC values ranging from 0.86 to 0.94, sensitivity between 66.7% and 91.7%, specificity from 71.4% to 100.0%, accuracy between 78.8% and 91.1%, PPV ranging from 64.7% to 100.0%, and negative predictive value between 84.0% and 93.8%. No significant differences in AUC values were observed between the arterial and portal venous phases in either the training or test set.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The preoperative CT-based radiomics model exhibited robust predictive capability for identifying LNM in PC.</p>","PeriodicalId":23819,"journal":{"name":"World journal of radiology","volume":"17 8","pages":"109373"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12400248/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v17.i8.109373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is a key prognostic factor in pancreatic cancer (PC). Accurate preoperative prediction of LNM remains challenging. Radiomics offers a noninvasive method to extract quantitative imaging features that may aid in predicting LNM.

Aim: To investigate the potential value of a computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics model in prediction of LNM in PC.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 168 pathologically confirmed PC patients who underwent contrast-enhanced-CT. Among them, 107 cases had no LNM, while 61 cases had confirmed LNM. These patients were randomly divided into a training cohort (n = 135) and a validation cohort (n = 33). A total of 792 radiomics features were extracted, comprising 396 features from the arterial phase and another 396 from the portal venous phase. The Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator methods were used for feature selection and Radiomics model construction. The receiver operating characteristic curve was employed to assess the diagnostic potential of the model, and DeLong test was used to compare the area under the curve (AUC) values of the model.

Results: Six radiomics features from the arterial phase and nine from the portal venous phase were selected. The Radscore model demonstrated strong predictive performance for LNM in both the training and test cohorts, with AUC values ranging from 0.86 to 0.94, sensitivity between 66.7% and 91.7%, specificity from 71.4% to 100.0%, accuracy between 78.8% and 91.1%, PPV ranging from 64.7% to 100.0%, and negative predictive value between 84.0% and 93.8%. No significant differences in AUC values were observed between the arterial and portal venous phases in either the training or test set.

Conclusion: The preoperative CT-based radiomics model exhibited robust predictive capability for identifying LNM in PC.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

发展和验证计算机断层放射组学预测胰腺癌淋巴结转移的策略。
背景:淋巴结转移(LNM)是胰腺癌预后的关键因素。准确的术前预测LNM仍然具有挑战性。放射组学提供了一种非侵入性的方法来提取定量成像特征,可能有助于预测LNM。目的:探讨基于计算机断层扫描(CT)的放射组学模型在预测前列腺癌LNM中的潜在价值。方法:对168例经病理证实的PC患者行ct增强扫描进行回顾性分析。其中未见LNM 107例,确诊LNM 61例。这些患者被随机分为训练组(n = 135)和验证组(n = 33)。总共提取了792个放射组学特征,其中396个来自动脉期,396个来自门静脉期。采用最小冗余、最大关联、最小绝对收缩和选择算子方法进行特征选择和放射组学模型构建。采用受试者工作特征曲线评价模型的诊断潜力,采用DeLong检验比较模型的曲线下面积(AUC)值。结果:选取动脉期放射组学特征6个,门静脉期放射组学特征9个。Radscore模型在训练组和测试组均表现出较强的LNM预测能力,AUC值为0.86 ~ 0.94,灵敏度为66.7% ~ 91.7%,特异性为71.4% ~ 100.0%,准确率为78.8% ~ 91.1%,PPV值为64.7% ~ 100.0%,阴性预测值为84.0% ~ 93.8%。在训练组和测试组中,动脉期和门静脉期的AUC值没有显著差异。结论:术前基于ct的放射组学模型对鉴别PC中的LNM具有较强的预测能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World journal of radiology
World journal of radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
自引率
8.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信