Public perceptions of radioactively contaminated waste resulting from environmental decontamination efforts after a large nuclear accident: a comparison with high-level radioactive waste and industrial waste.

IF 1.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Momo Takada, Kaoru Suzuki, Kosuke Shirai, Tetsuo Yasutaka
{"title":"Public perceptions of radioactively contaminated waste resulting from environmental decontamination efforts after a large nuclear accident: a comparison with high-level radioactive waste and industrial waste.","authors":"Momo Takada, Kaoru Suzuki, Kosuke Shirai, Tetsuo Yasutaka","doi":"10.1088/1361-6498/ae02a1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to gather practical insights into the social aspects of waste disposal following environmental decontamination after a nuclear accident. By comparing decontamination waste with high-level radioactive waste and industrial waste, we gained a clearer understanding of the public's perceptions. In March 2024, an online survey was conducted targeting people aged 20-69 in the Kanto region of Japan, with 1500 respondents assigned to each of three categories (decontamination waste, high-level radioactive waste and industrial waste), totalling 4500 participants. The survey measured the acceptability of a proposed disposal site, emotional valence, risk perception, benefit perception, stigma and trust in the relevant authorities using open-ended questions on impressions of a waste-disposal siting plan. Differences in psychological factors were analysed using structural equation modelling, and impressions were evaluated through text analysis. The survey results showed that public impressions and the impact of emotion on the acceptability of decontamination waste disposal sites were similar to high-level radioactive waste. In contrast, emotions, risk perception and acceptability of decontamination waste disposal sites were similar to those for industrial waste or positioned between industrial waste and high-level radioactive waste disposal sites. These findings suggest that winning the public's acceptance of disposal sites for decontamination waste may be less challenging than for high-level radioactive waste. However, the results also emphasise that authorities must be cautious of the public's strong aversion to nuclear issues and negative images when communicating with stakeholders and making decisions. This requires communication grounded in common language and values, along with structural support for partnerships between host and surrounding communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":50068,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiological Protection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiological Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ae02a1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to gather practical insights into the social aspects of waste disposal following environmental decontamination after a nuclear accident. By comparing decontamination waste with high-level radioactive waste and industrial waste, we gained a clearer understanding of the public's perceptions. In March 2024, an online survey was conducted targeting people aged 20-69 in the Kanto region of Japan, with 1500 respondents assigned to each of three categories (decontamination waste, high-level radioactive waste and industrial waste), totalling 4500 participants. The survey measured the acceptability of a proposed disposal site, emotional valence, risk perception, benefit perception, stigma and trust in the relevant authorities using open-ended questions on impressions of a waste-disposal siting plan. Differences in psychological factors were analysed using structural equation modelling, and impressions were evaluated through text analysis. The survey results showed that public impressions and the impact of emotion on the acceptability of decontamination waste disposal sites were similar to high-level radioactive waste. In contrast, emotions, risk perception and acceptability of decontamination waste disposal sites were similar to those for industrial waste or positioned between industrial waste and high-level radioactive waste disposal sites. These findings suggest that winning the public's acceptance of disposal sites for decontamination waste may be less challenging than for high-level radioactive waste. However, the results also emphasise that authorities must be cautious of the public's strong aversion to nuclear issues and negative images when communicating with stakeholders and making decisions. This requires communication grounded in common language and values, along with structural support for partnerships between host and surrounding communities.

公众对大型核事故后环境净化工作产生的放射性污染废物的看法:与高放射性废物和工业废物的比较。
本研究的目的是收集核事故后环境净化后废物处理的社会方面的实际见解。通过将去污废物与高放射性废物和工业废物进行比较,我们更清楚地了解了公众的看法。2024年3月,日本关东地区针对20-69岁的人群进行了一项在线调查,1500名受访者被分配到三个类别(去污废物、高放射性废物和工业废物),共有4500名参与者。该调查使用关于对废物处置选址计划印象的开放式问题,衡量了拟议处置地点的可接受性、情感价、风险感知、利益感知、耻辱和对有关当局的信任。使用结构方程模型分析心理因素的差异,并通过文本分析评估印象。调查结果显示,公众印象和情绪对消污废物处置场所可接受性的影响与高放射性废物相似。相比之下,去污废物处置场的情绪、风险感知和可接受性与工业废物相似,或处于工业废物和高放射性废物处置场之间。这些发现表明,与高放射性废物相比,让公众接受净化废物的处置地点可能更容易。然而,研究结果也强调,当局在与利益相关者沟通和决策时,必须警惕公众对核问题的强烈反感和负面形象。这需要以共同的语言和价值观为基础的沟通,以及为东道国和周边社区之间的伙伴关系提供结构性支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Radiological Protection
Journal of Radiological Protection 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
26.70%
发文量
137
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Radiological Protection publishes articles on all aspects of radiological protection, including non-ionising as well as ionising radiations. Fields of interest range from research, development and theory to operational matters, education and training. The very wide spectrum of its topics includes: dosimetry, instrument development, specialized measuring techniques, epidemiology, biological effects (in vivo and in vitro) and risk and environmental impact assessments. The journal encourages publication of data and code as well as results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信