MicroRNA-126-3p as a predictive biomarker for patients with primary biliary cholangitis refractory to ursodeoxycholic acid.

IF 5.4 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Shi-Da Pan, Chu-Yue Xiong, Ying-Juan Shen, Jia-He Tian, Yi-Lin Wang, Jia-Ning Wang, Si-Yu Wang, Feng-Yi Li, Li-Feng Wang, Qin Qiu, Luo Yang, Xiao-Meng Liu, Jun-Qing Luan, Zheng-Sheng Zou, Fu-Sheng Wang, Fan-Ping Meng
{"title":"MicroRNA-126-3p as a predictive biomarker for patients with primary biliary cholangitis refractory to ursodeoxycholic acid.","authors":"Shi-Da Pan, Chu-Yue Xiong, Ying-Juan Shen, Jia-He Tian, Yi-Lin Wang, Jia-Ning Wang, Si-Yu Wang, Feng-Yi Li, Li-Feng Wang, Qin Qiu, Luo Yang, Xiao-Meng Liu, Jun-Qing Luan, Zheng-Sheng Zou, Fu-Sheng Wang, Fan-Ping Meng","doi":"10.3748/wjg.v31.i31.109828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the first-line therapeutic agent for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). However, a subset of patients exhibit a suboptimal response to UDCA, and reliable predictive biomarkers remain elusive. Studies have implicated plasma microRNAs (miRNAs) in the pathophysiological progression of PBC, with certain miRNAs demonstrating potential as diagnostic and disease progression biomarkers. However, biomarkers capable of predicting the therapeutic efficacy of UDCA have not yet been identified.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate differentially expressed miRNAs in PBC patients with divergent UDCA treatment responses and to explore potential biomarkers that predict treatment response in PBC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Plasma samples from treatment-naive PBC patients receiving ≥ 1 year of standard UDCA treatment were collected. Efficacy was evaluated using the Paris I criteria. Patient samples were divided into discovery group (<i>n</i> = 10) and validation group (<i>n</i> = 30), with further stratification of patients into drug-resistant and drug-sensitive (DS) cohorts. Next-generation sequencing and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction were used to screen, functionally analyze, and validate the pre-treatment miRNA profiles of the treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-nine miRNAs were differentially expressed between the two groups before UDCA treatment (<i>N</i> = 40). MiR-22-5p and miR-126-3p were highly expressed in the DS group before treatment (<i>P</i> < 0.001), whereas miR-7706 exhibited a low expression (<i>P</i> = 0.017). Post-treatment, miR-126-3p maintained low expression in the drug-resistant group (<i>P</i> = 0.003), but showed elevated levels in the DS group (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis identified miR-126-3p expression (odds ratio = 34.32, 95% confidence interval: 1.95-605.40, <i>P</i> = 0.016) as a significant factor influencing UDCA treatment response, while miR-22-5p (<i>P</i> = 0.990) and miR-7706 (<i>P</i> = 0.157) showed no significant association. MiR-126-3p levels were negatively correlated with total bilirubin (<i>r</i> = -0.356, <i>P</i> = 0.005) and immunoglobulin G levels (<i>r</i> = -0.311, <i>P</i> = 0.015). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.891 (<i>P</i> = 0.0003, 95% confidence interval: 0.772-1.000) with a sensitivity of 82.4% and a specificity of 84.6%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Plasma miRNA expression profiles are heterogenous in patients with PBC with differential responses to UDCA therapy. MiR-126-3p demonstrates predictive potential for a suboptimal response to UDCA in patients with PBC.</p>","PeriodicalId":23778,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":"31 31","pages":"109828"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12400243/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i31.109828","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the first-line therapeutic agent for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). However, a subset of patients exhibit a suboptimal response to UDCA, and reliable predictive biomarkers remain elusive. Studies have implicated plasma microRNAs (miRNAs) in the pathophysiological progression of PBC, with certain miRNAs demonstrating potential as diagnostic and disease progression biomarkers. However, biomarkers capable of predicting the therapeutic efficacy of UDCA have not yet been identified.

Aim: To investigate differentially expressed miRNAs in PBC patients with divergent UDCA treatment responses and to explore potential biomarkers that predict treatment response in PBC.

Methods: Plasma samples from treatment-naive PBC patients receiving ≥ 1 year of standard UDCA treatment were collected. Efficacy was evaluated using the Paris I criteria. Patient samples were divided into discovery group (n = 10) and validation group (n = 30), with further stratification of patients into drug-resistant and drug-sensitive (DS) cohorts. Next-generation sequencing and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction were used to screen, functionally analyze, and validate the pre-treatment miRNA profiles of the treatment groups.

Results: Forty-nine miRNAs were differentially expressed between the two groups before UDCA treatment (N = 40). MiR-22-5p and miR-126-3p were highly expressed in the DS group before treatment (P < 0.001), whereas miR-7706 exhibited a low expression (P = 0.017). Post-treatment, miR-126-3p maintained low expression in the drug-resistant group (P = 0.003), but showed elevated levels in the DS group (P < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis identified miR-126-3p expression (odds ratio = 34.32, 95% confidence interval: 1.95-605.40, P = 0.016) as a significant factor influencing UDCA treatment response, while miR-22-5p (P = 0.990) and miR-7706 (P = 0.157) showed no significant association. MiR-126-3p levels were negatively correlated with total bilirubin (r = -0.356, P = 0.005) and immunoglobulin G levels (r = -0.311, P = 0.015). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.891 (P = 0.0003, 95% confidence interval: 0.772-1.000) with a sensitivity of 82.4% and a specificity of 84.6%.

Conclusion: Plasma miRNA expression profiles are heterogenous in patients with PBC with differential responses to UDCA therapy. MiR-126-3p demonstrates predictive potential for a suboptimal response to UDCA in patients with PBC.

MicroRNA-126-3p作为熊去氧胆酸难治性原发性胆管炎患者的预测性生物标志物
背景:熊去氧胆酸(UDCA)是原发性胆道胆管炎(PBC)的一线治疗药物。然而,一部分患者对UDCA表现出次优反应,可靠的预测性生物标志物仍然难以捉摸。研究表明血浆microRNAs (miRNAs)与PBC的病理生理进展有关,某些miRNAs显示出作为诊断和疾病进展生物标志物的潜力。然而,能够预测UDCA治疗效果的生物标志物尚未被确定。目的:研究UDCA治疗反应不同的PBC患者中差异表达的mirna,并探索预测PBC治疗反应的潜在生物标志物。方法:收集接受≥1年标准UDCA治疗的初治PBC患者的血浆样本。使用巴黎I标准评估疗效。将患者样本分为发现组(n = 10)和验证组(n = 30),并将患者进一步分层为耐药组和药敏组(DS)。下一代测序和定量实时聚合酶链反应用于筛选、功能分析和验证处理组的预处理前miRNA谱。结果:UDCA治疗前两组有49个mirna表达差异(N = 40)。治疗前DS组MiR-22-5p、miR-126-3p高表达(P < 0.001), miR-7706低表达(P = 0.017)。治疗后,耐药组miR-126-3p维持低表达(P = 0.003),而DS组miR-126-3p表达升高(P < 0.001)。Logistic回归分析发现miR-126-3p表达(优势比= 34.32,95%可信区间:1.95 ~ 605.40,P = 0.016)是影响UDCA治疗疗效的显著因素,而miR-22-5p (P = 0.990)和miR-7706 (P = 0.157)无显著相关性。MiR-126-3p水平与总胆红素(r = -0.356, P = 0.005)、免疫球蛋白G (r = -0.311, P = 0.015)呈负相关。受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.891 (P = 0.0003, 95%可信区间为0.772 ~ 1.000),敏感性为82.4%,特异性为84.6%。结论:血浆miRNA表达谱在对UDCA治疗有不同反应的PBC患者中具有异质性。MiR-126-3p显示了PBC患者对UDCA的次优反应的预测潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Gastroenterology
World Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.70%
发文量
464
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The primary aims of the WJG are to improve diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive modalities and the skills of clinicians and to guide clinical practice in gastroenterology and hepatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信