Is YouTube a reliable source for learning pre-endodontic build-up? A cross-sectional study.

IF 1.5
Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-24 DOI:10.5395/rde.2025.50.e27
Merve Gökyar, İdil Özden, Hesna Sazak Öveçoğlu
{"title":"Is YouTube a reliable source for learning pre-endodontic build-up? A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Merve Gökyar, İdil Özden, Hesna Sazak Öveçoğlu","doi":"10.5395/rde.2025.50.e27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study is to comprehensively analyze the quality, educational value, and demographic characteristics of pre-endodontic build-up videos published on the YouTube™ platform (Google LLC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted on YouTube™ using the keyword \"pre-endodontic build-up.\" The first 100 videos retrieved from the search results were reviewed, and 61 videos meeting the inclusion criteria were analyzed. After assessing the demographic characteristics of the videos, viewing rates and interaction indices were calculated. The quality of the videos was evaluated using the DISCERN instrument and the Global Quality Scale (GQS). Statistical analyses were performed on the obtained results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 61 videos were analyzed, of which 56% were uploaded by endodontists. The majority of the videos were found to be of low quality. As the DISCERN score increased, video duration, number of likes, number of comments, and view rate also increased. Additionally, a significant positive correlation was observed between the DISCERN score and the GQS value (p = 0.004). The relationship between video upload sources and various parameters was analyzed, revealing statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Considering all the evaluation methods used in this study, it is evident that the number of high-quality videos is low. This finding indicates that YouTube™ does not provide sufficient information on pre-endodontic build-up. To enhance its reliability as a source of medical information, YouTube™ should prioritize content that is not only popular but also accurate and of high quality, preferably created or endorsed by professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":21102,"journal":{"name":"Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics","volume":"50 3","pages":"e27"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12415235/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2025.50.e27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study is to comprehensively analyze the quality, educational value, and demographic characteristics of pre-endodontic build-up videos published on the YouTube™ platform (Google LLC).

Methods: The study was conducted on YouTube™ using the keyword "pre-endodontic build-up." The first 100 videos retrieved from the search results were reviewed, and 61 videos meeting the inclusion criteria were analyzed. After assessing the demographic characteristics of the videos, viewing rates and interaction indices were calculated. The quality of the videos was evaluated using the DISCERN instrument and the Global Quality Scale (GQS). Statistical analyses were performed on the obtained results.

Results: A total of 61 videos were analyzed, of which 56% were uploaded by endodontists. The majority of the videos were found to be of low quality. As the DISCERN score increased, video duration, number of likes, number of comments, and view rate also increased. Additionally, a significant positive correlation was observed between the DISCERN score and the GQS value (p = 0.004). The relationship between video upload sources and various parameters was analyzed, revealing statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Considering all the evaluation methods used in this study, it is evident that the number of high-quality videos is low. This finding indicates that YouTube™ does not provide sufficient information on pre-endodontic build-up. To enhance its reliability as a source of medical information, YouTube™ should prioritize content that is not only popular but also accurate and of high quality, preferably created or endorsed by professionals.

Abstract Image

YouTube是学习牙髓前形成的可靠来源吗?横断面研究。
目的:本研究的目的是全面分析YouTube™平台(谷歌LLC)上发布的牙髓前构建视频的质量、教育价值和人口统计学特征。方法:该研究在YouTube™上进行,关键词为“牙髓前形成”。对从搜索结果中检索到的前100个视频进行审查,并对61个符合纳入标准的视频进行分析。在评估了视频的人口统计学特征后,计算了收视率和互动指数。使用DISCERN仪器和全球质量量表(GQS)评估视频的质量。对所得结果进行统计分析。结果:共分析了61个视频,其中56%是牙髓医生上传的。大多数视频的质量都很低。随着DISCERN分数的增加,视频时长、点赞数、评论数和观看率也有所增加。此外,DISCERN评分与GQS值之间存在显著正相关(p = 0.004)。分析视频上传源与各参数之间的关系,差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:综合本研究使用的所有评价方法,可以明显看出优质视频的数量较少。这一发现表明YouTube™并没有提供足够的关于牙髓前形成的信息。为了提高其作为医疗信息来源的可靠性,YouTube™应优先考虑不仅受欢迎,而且准确和高质量的内容,最好是由专业人士创建或认可的内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信