Temporal analysis of the administration of encephalic reperfusion therapies during the COVID-19 pandemic in a Chilean hospital: An analytical cross-sectional study.

IF 0.8 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Keren Zambrano, Marcelo Arancibia, Catalina Soto, Julio Riquelme
{"title":"Temporal analysis of the administration of encephalic reperfusion therapies during the COVID-19 pandemic in a Chilean hospital: An analytical cross-sectional study.","authors":"Keren Zambrano, Marcelo Arancibia, Catalina Soto, Julio Riquelme","doi":"10.5867/medwave.2025.08.3081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic had a major impact on emergency services, including stroke care. Changes in the administration times of brain reperfusion therapies for stroke have been little explored in Chile. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact that the pandemic had on critical stroke treatment times, the number of patients treated, clinical severity, and the presence of major vessel occlusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing encephalic reperfusion therapy in a hospital in Valparaíso, Chile. Two groups of patients treated one year before (pre-pandemic group) and one year after (pandemic group) the start of health restrictions were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>104 patients were included, with a mean age of 67.4 ± 13 years and a clinical severity of 13.5 ± 6.5 in the NIHSS. 91.5% received thrombolytic therapy. No significant intergroup differences were found in the metrics of treatment time, number of patients treated, clinical severity, or presence of major vessel occlusion. Although there was a non-significant trend towards delayed institutional therapeutic times, a significant correlation was found suggesting that the shorter the time from symptom onset to door, the shorter the time to access therapy (r = 0.84).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There were no significant differences in the therapeutic times of stroke in the period prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and the pandemic period, showing similarities to the experience reported in Chile and highlighting the adaptation of the health system during the health crisis. Studies with more complex epidemiological designs analyzing larger samples of patients will allow us to complement these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":18597,"journal":{"name":"Medwave","volume":"25 8","pages":"e381"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medwave","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2025.08.3081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic had a major impact on emergency services, including stroke care. Changes in the administration times of brain reperfusion therapies for stroke have been little explored in Chile. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact that the pandemic had on critical stroke treatment times, the number of patients treated, clinical severity, and the presence of major vessel occlusion.

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing encephalic reperfusion therapy in a hospital in Valparaíso, Chile. Two groups of patients treated one year before (pre-pandemic group) and one year after (pandemic group) the start of health restrictions were compared.

Results: 104 patients were included, with a mean age of 67.4 ± 13 years and a clinical severity of 13.5 ± 6.5 in the NIHSS. 91.5% received thrombolytic therapy. No significant intergroup differences were found in the metrics of treatment time, number of patients treated, clinical severity, or presence of major vessel occlusion. Although there was a non-significant trend towards delayed institutional therapeutic times, a significant correlation was found suggesting that the shorter the time from symptom onset to door, the shorter the time to access therapy (r = 0.84).

Conclusions: There were no significant differences in the therapeutic times of stroke in the period prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and the pandemic period, showing similarities to the experience reported in Chile and highlighting the adaptation of the health system during the health crisis. Studies with more complex epidemiological designs analyzing larger samples of patients will allow us to complement these results.

智利一家医院在COVID-19大流行期间脑再灌注治疗的时间分析:一项分析性横断面研究。
2019冠状病毒病大流行对包括卒中护理在内的紧急服务产生了重大影响。在智利,脑再灌注治疗的给药时间的变化很少被探索。本研究的目的是分析大流行对脑卒中治疗关键时间、治疗患者数量、临床严重程度和主要血管闭塞的影响。方法:我们对智利Valparaíso一家医院接受脑再灌注治疗的患者进行回顾性分析。比较两组患者在卫生限制开始前一年(大流行前组)和开始后一年(大流行组)接受治疗的情况。结果:纳入104例患者,平均年龄67.4±13岁,NIHSS临床严重程度13.5±6.5。91.5%接受溶栓治疗。在治疗时间、治疗人数、临床严重程度或主要血管闭塞的存在等指标上,组间无显著差异。虽然延迟机构治疗时间的趋势不显著,但发现显著相关表明,从症状出现到门的时间越短,获得治疗的时间越短(r = 0.84)。结论:在2019冠状病毒病大流行前和大流行期间,卒中治疗时间无显著差异,与智利报告的经验相似,突出了卫生系统在卫生危机期间的适应性。采用更复杂的流行病学设计、分析更大患者样本的研究将使我们能够补充这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medwave
Medwave MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
50
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medwave is a peer-reviewed, biomedical and public health journal. Since its foundation in 2001 (Volume 1) it has always been an online only, open access publication that does not charge subscription or reader fees. Since January 2011 (Volume 11, Number 1), all articles are peer-reviewed. Without losing sight of the importance of evidence-based approach and methodological soundness, the journal accepts for publication articles that focus on providing updates for clinical practice, review and analysis articles on topics such as ethics, public health and health policy; clinical, social and economic health determinants; clinical and health research findings from all of the major disciplines of medicine, medical science and public health. The journal does not publish basic science manuscripts or experiments conducted on animals. Until March 2013, Medwave was publishing 11-12 numbers a year. Each issue would be posted on the homepage on day 1 of each month, except for Chile’s summer holiday when the issue would cover two months. Starting from April 2013, Medwave adopted the continuous mode of publication, which means that the copyedited accepted articles are posted on the journal’s homepage as they are ready. They are then collated in the respective issue and included in the Past Issues section.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信