Pharmacokinetics of Ampicillin Trihydrate in Plasma, Interstitial, and Peritoneal Fluid Following Intraperitoneal or Intramuscular Administration in Steers at the Beginning of a Standing Flank Laparotomy.

IF 1.7 4区 农林科学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Danielle A Mzyk, Jennifer L Halleran, Laura M Neumann, Ronald E Baynes, Derek M Foster
{"title":"Pharmacokinetics of Ampicillin Trihydrate in Plasma, Interstitial, and Peritoneal Fluid Following Intraperitoneal or Intramuscular Administration in Steers at the Beginning of a Standing Flank Laparotomy.","authors":"Danielle A Mzyk, Jennifer L Halleran, Laura M Neumann, Ronald E Baynes, Derek M Foster","doi":"10.1111/jvp.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prophylactic and perioperative use of antibiotics is common prior to abdominal surgery in cattle for minimizing the risk of postoperative infections. Yet, there is little information on drug concentrations at sites of potential infections following surgical procedures. The objective of this study was to compare the concentrations in the plasma, peritoneal fluid, and interstitial fluid of ampicillin trihydrate in cattle. In a randomized design, ampicillin trihydrate, a β-lactam antibiotic, was administered to 12 healthy Holstein-Friesian steers intraoperatively via intraperitoneal (IP; n = 6) or intramuscular (IM; n = 6) injection in the cervical neck muscles at 11 mg/kg for both groups. For IP administration, ampicillin trihydrate was deposited into the abdominal cavity following an incision in the right paralumbar fossa. Steers in the IM group were administered ampicillin prior to surgical closure. Peritoneal fluid and interstitial fluid were collected using ultrafiltration probes. IP administration achieved higher concentrations in peritoneal fluid as compared to IM administration. Maximum plasma concentrations were significantly higher following IP administration (3.11 ± 2.5 μg/mL; p < 0.004) compared to the IM group (0.05 ± 10.9 μg/mL). Despite high peritoneal fluid concentrations of ampicillin, the variability in critical pharmacokinetic parameters following IP administration raises concerns about its therapeutic reliability. The correlation between intraperitoneal drug concentrations and clinical efficacy warrants further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":17596,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jvp.70023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prophylactic and perioperative use of antibiotics is common prior to abdominal surgery in cattle for minimizing the risk of postoperative infections. Yet, there is little information on drug concentrations at sites of potential infections following surgical procedures. The objective of this study was to compare the concentrations in the plasma, peritoneal fluid, and interstitial fluid of ampicillin trihydrate in cattle. In a randomized design, ampicillin trihydrate, a β-lactam antibiotic, was administered to 12 healthy Holstein-Friesian steers intraoperatively via intraperitoneal (IP; n = 6) or intramuscular (IM; n = 6) injection in the cervical neck muscles at 11 mg/kg for both groups. For IP administration, ampicillin trihydrate was deposited into the abdominal cavity following an incision in the right paralumbar fossa. Steers in the IM group were administered ampicillin prior to surgical closure. Peritoneal fluid and interstitial fluid were collected using ultrafiltration probes. IP administration achieved higher concentrations in peritoneal fluid as compared to IM administration. Maximum plasma concentrations were significantly higher following IP administration (3.11 ± 2.5 μg/mL; p < 0.004) compared to the IM group (0.05 ± 10.9 μg/mL). Despite high peritoneal fluid concentrations of ampicillin, the variability in critical pharmacokinetic parameters following IP administration raises concerns about its therapeutic reliability. The correlation between intraperitoneal drug concentrations and clinical efficacy warrants further investigation.

立腹剖腹手术开始后腹腔或肌肉注射氨苄西林在血浆、间质液和腹膜液中的药代动力学
预防和围手术期使用抗生素是常见的牛腹部手术之前,以尽量减少术后感染的风险。然而,关于外科手术后潜在感染部位药物浓度的信息很少。本研究的目的是比较三水合氨苄西林在牛血浆、腹膜液和组织液中的浓度。在一项随机设计中,12只健康的荷斯坦-弗里斯氏阉牛术中分别以11 mg/kg的剂量腹腔注射(IP, n = 6)或肌肉注射(IM, n = 6)给药。氨苄西林是一种β-内酰胺类抗生素。对于IP管理,氨苄西林三水合物沉积在腹腔后,在右腰旁窝的切口。IM组患者在手术结束前给予氨苄青霉素。采用超滤探针采集腹膜液和间质液。与IM相比,IP在腹膜液中的浓度更高。给药后最大血药浓度显著升高(3.11±2.5 μg/mL
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
15.40%
发文量
69
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics (JVPT) is an international journal devoted to the publication of scientific papers in the basic and clinical aspects of veterinary pharmacology and toxicology, whether the study is in vitro, in vivo, ex vivo or in silico. The Journal is a forum for recent scientific information and developments in the discipline of veterinary pharmacology, including toxicology and therapeutics. Studies that are entirely in vitro will not be considered within the scope of JVPT unless the study has direct relevance to the use of the drug (including toxicants and feed additives) in veterinary species, or that it can be clearly demonstrated that a similar outcome would be expected in vivo. These studies should consider approved or widely used veterinary drugs and/or drugs with broad applicability to veterinary species.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信