Major Causes of Perinatal and Paediatric Mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia: Adjustment for Selection Bias in the CHAMPS Network.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Kartavya J Vyas, Jonathan A Muir, Zachary J Madewell, Priya M Gupta, Dianna M Blau, Shams E Arifeen, Emily S Gurley, Atique I Chowdhury, Kazi M Islam, Afruna Rahman, J Anthony G Scott, Nega Assefa, Lola Madrid, Yohanis A Asefa, Yasir Y Abdullahi, Dickens Onyango, Victor Akelo, Beth A Tippett-Barr, George Aol, Samba O Sow, Karen L Kotloff, Milagritos D Tapia, Adama M Keita, Kiranpreet Chawla, Quique Bassat, Inacio Mandomando, Ariel Nhacolo, Charfudin Sacoor, Ikechukwu Ogbuanu, Dickens Kowuor, Babatunde Duduyemi, Andrew Moseray, James S Squire, Shabir Madhi, Sana Mahtab, Yasmin Adam, Amy Wise, Takwanisa Machemedza, Cynthia G Whitney
{"title":"Major Causes of Perinatal and Paediatric Mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia: Adjustment for Selection Bias in the CHAMPS Network.","authors":"Kartavya J Vyas, Jonathan A Muir, Zachary J Madewell, Priya M Gupta, Dianna M Blau, Shams E Arifeen, Emily S Gurley, Atique I Chowdhury, Kazi M Islam, Afruna Rahman, J Anthony G Scott, Nega Assefa, Lola Madrid, Yohanis A Asefa, Yasir Y Abdullahi, Dickens Onyango, Victor Akelo, Beth A Tippett-Barr, George Aol, Samba O Sow, Karen L Kotloff, Milagritos D Tapia, Adama M Keita, Kiranpreet Chawla, Quique Bassat, Inacio Mandomando, Ariel Nhacolo, Charfudin Sacoor, Ikechukwu Ogbuanu, Dickens Kowuor, Babatunde Duduyemi, Andrew Moseray, James S Squire, Shabir Madhi, Sana Mahtab, Yasmin Adam, Amy Wise, Takwanisa Machemedza, Cynthia G Whitney","doi":"10.1111/ppe.70067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies of child mortality that employ minimally invasive tissue sampling (MITS) produce highly accurate cause of death data; however, selection bias may render these as non-representative of their underlying populations.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Estimate cause-specific mortality fractions and rates for the five most frequent causes-underlying and others in the chain of events leading to death-among stillbirths, neonatal, infant and child deaths-in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, adjusted for any identified selection biases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Child Health and Mortality Prevention Surveillance (CHAMPS) Network collects standardised, population-based, longitudinal data on causes of death among stillbirths and under-five children in 12 catchments in seven countries in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Cause-specific mortality fractions and rates were calculated for the five most frequent causes among stillbirths, neonatal, infant and child deaths, and for the five most frequent maternal conditions among perinatal deaths; all estimates were subsequently adjusted for selection bias. Selection probabilities were estimated from membership in subgroups defined by factors hypothesised to affect selection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2017-2020, of 10,122 deaths ascertained, 5847 (57.8%) were enrolled in CHAMPS and 2654 (26.2%) additionally consented to MITS. Estimates were calculated for 265 and 65 site/age-specific causes of death and maternal conditions, respectively; five (1.9%) and four (6.2%) required adjustment, respectively, but they did not meaningfully change. Estimates were calculated for 34 site-specific causes of death among all stillbirths and under-five deaths combined; 28 (82.4%) required adjustment (all included age at death), and change-in-estimates demonstrated considerable variability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Selection bias is not a concern in the CHAMPS Network. Deaths where MITS were performed accurately represent the distribution of causes of death in their respective target populations, specifically when stratified by age or adjusted accordingly. Future studies of child mortality that employ MITS should consider adjusting for age at death for their measures of frequency.</p>","PeriodicalId":19698,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.70067","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Studies of child mortality that employ minimally invasive tissue sampling (MITS) produce highly accurate cause of death data; however, selection bias may render these as non-representative of their underlying populations.

Objectives: Estimate cause-specific mortality fractions and rates for the five most frequent causes-underlying and others in the chain of events leading to death-among stillbirths, neonatal, infant and child deaths-in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, adjusted for any identified selection biases.

Methods: The Child Health and Mortality Prevention Surveillance (CHAMPS) Network collects standardised, population-based, longitudinal data on causes of death among stillbirths and under-five children in 12 catchments in seven countries in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Cause-specific mortality fractions and rates were calculated for the five most frequent causes among stillbirths, neonatal, infant and child deaths, and for the five most frequent maternal conditions among perinatal deaths; all estimates were subsequently adjusted for selection bias. Selection probabilities were estimated from membership in subgroups defined by factors hypothesised to affect selection.

Results: In 2017-2020, of 10,122 deaths ascertained, 5847 (57.8%) were enrolled in CHAMPS and 2654 (26.2%) additionally consented to MITS. Estimates were calculated for 265 and 65 site/age-specific causes of death and maternal conditions, respectively; five (1.9%) and four (6.2%) required adjustment, respectively, but they did not meaningfully change. Estimates were calculated for 34 site-specific causes of death among all stillbirths and under-five deaths combined; 28 (82.4%) required adjustment (all included age at death), and change-in-estimates demonstrated considerable variability.

Conclusions: Selection bias is not a concern in the CHAMPS Network. Deaths where MITS were performed accurately represent the distribution of causes of death in their respective target populations, specifically when stratified by age or adjusted accordingly. Future studies of child mortality that employ MITS should consider adjusting for age at death for their measures of frequency.

撒哈拉以南非洲和南亚围产期和儿科死亡的主要原因:CHAMPS网络中选择偏差的调整。
背景:采用微创组织取样(MITS)的儿童死亡率研究产生了高度准确的死亡原因数据;然而,选择偏差可能使这些不代表其潜在人群。目的:估计撒哈拉以南非洲和南亚地区死产、新生儿、婴儿和儿童死亡中5种最常见原因(潜在原因和导致死亡的事件链中的其他原因)的特定原因死亡率比例和比率,并对任何确定的选择偏差进行调整。方法:儿童健康和死亡率预防监测(CHAMPS)网络收集撒哈拉以南非洲和南亚7个国家12个流域的死产和5岁以下儿童死亡原因的标准化、基于人群的纵向数据。计算了死产、新生儿、婴儿和儿童死亡中最常见的五种原因和围产期死亡中最常见的五种产妇疾病的特定原因死亡率的比例和比率;所有的估计值随后都根据选择偏差进行了调整。选择概率是由假设影响选择的因素定义的子群体的成员来估计的。结果:2017-2020年,在确定的10,122例死亡中,5847例(57.8%)参加了CHAMPS, 2654例(26.2%)额外同意了MITS。分别计算了265和65个特定地点/年龄的死亡原因和产妇状况的估计数;5个(1.9%)和4个(6.2%)分别需要调整,但它们没有意义的变化。计算了所有死产和五岁以下儿童死亡总数中34种特定地点死亡原因的估计数;28例(82.4%)需要调整(均包括死亡年龄),估计值的变化显示出相当大的可变性。结论:选择偏倚在CHAMPS网络中不是一个问题。进行MITS的死亡准确地代表了各自目标人群的死因分布,特别是按年龄分层或进行相应调整时。未来使用MITS对儿童死亡率的研究应考虑调整死亡年龄作为测量频率的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
84
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology crosses the boundaries between the epidemiologist and the paediatrician, obstetrician or specialist in child health, ensuring that important paediatric and perinatal studies reach those clinicians for whom the results are especially relevant. In addition to original research articles, the Journal also includes commentaries, book reviews and annotations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信