In Vivo Irritation and Sensitization Assessment of Cypermethrin, Pymetrozine, and Indoxacarb-Emamectin Benzoate Combination in Test Animals.

IF 3 Q2 TOXICOLOGY
Journal of Toxicology Pub Date : 2025-08-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/jt/1282928
Wahyu Daradjat Natawigena, Kirana Fayruz Swarga, Gloria Mahayarni Lastiar Sitinjak, Muhammad Ilfadry Rifasta, Agus Susanto, Gofarana Wilar, Cecep Suhandi
{"title":"In Vivo Irritation and Sensitization Assessment of Cypermethrin, Pymetrozine, and Indoxacarb-Emamectin Benzoate Combination in Test Animals.","authors":"Wahyu Daradjat Natawigena, Kirana Fayruz Swarga, Gloria Mahayarni Lastiar Sitinjak, Muhammad Ilfadry Rifasta, Agus Susanto, Gofarana Wilar, Cecep Suhandi","doi":"10.1155/jt/1282928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Insecticides are widely used to protect agricultural and plantation products from pests and plant-disrupting organisms. Prior to market distribution, pesticide-containing products must undergo safety evaluations, including assessments of potential skin and eye irritation and allergic responses. In this study, we conducted one of the first comparative in vivo evaluations of commercial insecticidal formulations containing cypermethrin (Gusano 300 EC), pymetrozine (Vorum 50 WG), and indoxacarb-emamectin benzoate (Endorse Plus 160/20 OD) using internationally recognized protocols based on OECD 404 (skin irritation), OECD 405 (eye irritation), and OECD 406 (skin sensitization). The results showed that the cypermethrin formulation caused minimal skin irritation, mild eye irritation, and skin sensitization. The pymetrozine formulation did not cause skin irritation or sensitization but induced mild eye irritation. The indoxacarb-emamectin Benzoate formulation caused mild eye irritation and skin sensitization, with minimal skin irritation. These findings contribute novel data to the toxicological profile of these pesticide formulations and support future safety evaluations and regulatory assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":17421,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Toxicology","volume":"2025 ","pages":"1282928"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12401598/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/jt/1282928","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Insecticides are widely used to protect agricultural and plantation products from pests and plant-disrupting organisms. Prior to market distribution, pesticide-containing products must undergo safety evaluations, including assessments of potential skin and eye irritation and allergic responses. In this study, we conducted one of the first comparative in vivo evaluations of commercial insecticidal formulations containing cypermethrin (Gusano 300 EC), pymetrozine (Vorum 50 WG), and indoxacarb-emamectin benzoate (Endorse Plus 160/20 OD) using internationally recognized protocols based on OECD 404 (skin irritation), OECD 405 (eye irritation), and OECD 406 (skin sensitization). The results showed that the cypermethrin formulation caused minimal skin irritation, mild eye irritation, and skin sensitization. The pymetrozine formulation did not cause skin irritation or sensitization but induced mild eye irritation. The indoxacarb-emamectin Benzoate formulation caused mild eye irritation and skin sensitization, with minimal skin irritation. These findings contribute novel data to the toxicological profile of these pesticide formulations and support future safety evaluations and regulatory assessments.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

氯氰菊酯、吡虫胺和吲哚虫威-甲维菌素苯甲酸酯在实验动物体内的刺激和致敏评价。
杀虫剂被广泛用于保护农业和种植园产品免受害虫和破坏植物的生物的侵害。在投放市场之前,含农药产品必须经过安全评估,包括评估潜在的皮肤和眼睛刺激和过敏反应。在这项研究中,我们采用国际公认的基于OECD 404(皮肤刺激)、OECD 405(眼睛刺激)和OECD 406(皮肤致敏)的方案,对含有氯氰菊酯(Gusano 300 EC)、吡虫胺(Vorum 50 WG)和吲哚卡威-埃维菌素苯甲酸酯(背书加160/20 OD)的商业杀虫配方进行了首次体内比较评估。结果表明,氯氰菊酯制剂对皮肤的刺激最小,对眼睛的刺激轻微,对皮肤有致敏作用。吡吡嗪制剂不引起皮肤刺激或致敏,但引起轻度眼睛刺激。吲哚卡威-埃维菌素苯甲酸酯制剂引起轻度眼睛刺激和皮肤致敏,皮肤刺激最小。这些发现为这些农药配方的毒理学概况提供了新的数据,并为未来的安全评估和监管评估提供了支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Toxicology
Journal of Toxicology TOXICOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Toxicology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of toxicological sciences. The journal will consider articles looking at the structure, function, and mechanism of agents that are toxic to humans and/or animals, as well as toxicological medicine, risk assessment, safety evaluation, and environmental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信