Clinical and Radiological Assessment of Modified Weaver-Dunn Technology, Arthroscopic Single Tunnel Technique and Arthroscopic Coracoid Sling Technique Three Different Surgical Techniques in the Treatment of Acute Rockwood III-V Acromioclavicular Dislocations.
Yongtao Zeng, Hongcheng Zheng, ReFati Nijiati, NacikeDaoerji, Husen Wang, Bin Tang, Yimuranjiang Yiming, Erpanijiang Tusunjiang, Li Shu
{"title":"Clinical and Radiological Assessment of Modified Weaver-Dunn Technology, Arthroscopic Single Tunnel Technique and Arthroscopic Coracoid Sling Technique Three Different Surgical Techniques in the Treatment of Acute Rockwood III-V Acromioclavicular Dislocations.","authors":"Yongtao Zeng, Hongcheng Zheng, ReFati Nijiati, NacikeDaoerji, Husen Wang, Bin Tang, Yimuranjiang Yiming, Erpanijiang Tusunjiang, Li Shu","doi":"10.2147/JMDH.S531538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy and radiological results of three surgical methods for treating Rockwood III-V acromioclavicular dislocation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 62 patients with acute Rockwood III-V acromioclavicular dislocation who were admitted to our hospital from September 2017 to December 2022. Among these patients, 19 received the modified Weaver-Dunn technique (Group A), 20 underwent the arthroscopic single tunnel technique (Group B), and 23 received the arthroscopic coracoid sling technique (Group C). The clinical outcomes assessed included perioperative indicators, shoulder joint function outcomes, VAS scores, acromioclavicular joint redislocation rates, and complications. The radiological results primarily focused on the changes in the distance between the beak and the clavicle (CCD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients were followed for an average duration of 32.72 ± 7.93 months. At the final follow-up, the shoulder joint function scores, pain scores, and imaging findings of all three patient groups exhibited significant improvements compared to their preoperative values. Three months post-surgery, a comparative analysis among the three groups revealed that Groups B and C demonstrated significantly superior shoulder joint function scores and pain relief in comparison to Group A (p 0.05). Regarding complications, all three groups experienced various postoperative complications; however, no significant differences were found in the incidence of complications among the groups (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Three surgical methods have demonstrated favorable and comparable clinical and imaging outcomes in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular dislocation. Compared to the modified Weaver-Dunn technique, coracoid process single tunnel fixation and coracoid process non-tunnel suspension fixation may be more effective and provide a higher level of mobility.</p>","PeriodicalId":16357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","volume":"18 ","pages":"5327-5339"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12404188/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S531538","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy and radiological results of three surgical methods for treating Rockwood III-V acromioclavicular dislocation.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 62 patients with acute Rockwood III-V acromioclavicular dislocation who were admitted to our hospital from September 2017 to December 2022. Among these patients, 19 received the modified Weaver-Dunn technique (Group A), 20 underwent the arthroscopic single tunnel technique (Group B), and 23 received the arthroscopic coracoid sling technique (Group C). The clinical outcomes assessed included perioperative indicators, shoulder joint function outcomes, VAS scores, acromioclavicular joint redislocation rates, and complications. The radiological results primarily focused on the changes in the distance between the beak and the clavicle (CCD).
Results: All patients were followed for an average duration of 32.72 ± 7.93 months. At the final follow-up, the shoulder joint function scores, pain scores, and imaging findings of all three patient groups exhibited significant improvements compared to their preoperative values. Three months post-surgery, a comparative analysis among the three groups revealed that Groups B and C demonstrated significantly superior shoulder joint function scores and pain relief in comparison to Group A (p 0.05). Regarding complications, all three groups experienced various postoperative complications; however, no significant differences were found in the incidence of complications among the groups (p > 0.05).
Conclusion: Three surgical methods have demonstrated favorable and comparable clinical and imaging outcomes in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular dislocation. Compared to the modified Weaver-Dunn technique, coracoid process single tunnel fixation and coracoid process non-tunnel suspension fixation may be more effective and provide a higher level of mobility.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (JMDH) aims to represent and publish research in healthcare areas delivered by practitioners of different disciplines. This includes studies and reviews conducted by multidisciplinary teams as well as research which evaluates or reports the results or conduct of such teams or healthcare processes in general. The journal covers a very wide range of areas and we welcome submissions from practitioners at all levels and from all over the world. Good healthcare is not bounded by person, place or time and the journal aims to reflect this. The JMDH is published as an open-access journal to allow this wide range of practical, patient relevant research to be immediately available to practitioners who can access and use it immediately upon publication.