{"title":"The Effect of Clear Aligners on Awareness of Tooth Clenching.","authors":"Grace Francois, Mauro Farella, Hamza Bennani","doi":"10.1111/joor.70047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Clear aligners (CAs) are an increasingly popular treatment option in modern dentistry, yet surprisingly little is known about their potential unwanted side effects. Previous observations suggest that CAs may induce tooth clenching, which, in turn, could lead to masticatory muscle discomfort or pain. Nevertheless, available information is mainly subjective, anecdotal, and contradictory. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of wearing passive CAs on both objectively measured tooth clenching and the awareness of tooth clenching during stress-inducing tasks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-one study participants completed a 10-min stress-inducing mental arithmetic task, both with and without the passive CAs in place. During these tasks, masticatory muscle activity (MMA) was continuously recorded to objectively assess clenching. Following completion of each task, participants rated their perceived clenching and stress using visual-analogue scales. After the final task, they completed the Oral Behaviours and Somatization Questionnaire. Spearman's correlation and mixed models were used for the statistical analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Wearing CAs did not significantly affect MMA or perceived clenching. MMA was not associated with self-reported oral behaviours, but a significant association was found with somatisation scores (p < 0.05). Individuals with higher somatisation scores experienced more MMA contraction episodes compared to those with lower scores (R = 0.47; p = 0.015).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Wearing an aligner does not influence either perceived or objectively assessed clenching over the short term. Self-reported clenching is not a reliable measure of actual clenching behaviours. Somatisation appears to be a key mediator in the relationship between clenching and clear aligner wear.</p>","PeriodicalId":16605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.70047","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Clear aligners (CAs) are an increasingly popular treatment option in modern dentistry, yet surprisingly little is known about their potential unwanted side effects. Previous observations suggest that CAs may induce tooth clenching, which, in turn, could lead to masticatory muscle discomfort or pain. Nevertheless, available information is mainly subjective, anecdotal, and contradictory. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of wearing passive CAs on both objectively measured tooth clenching and the awareness of tooth clenching during stress-inducing tasks.
Methods: Twenty-one study participants completed a 10-min stress-inducing mental arithmetic task, both with and without the passive CAs in place. During these tasks, masticatory muscle activity (MMA) was continuously recorded to objectively assess clenching. Following completion of each task, participants rated their perceived clenching and stress using visual-analogue scales. After the final task, they completed the Oral Behaviours and Somatization Questionnaire. Spearman's correlation and mixed models were used for the statistical analyses.
Results: Wearing CAs did not significantly affect MMA or perceived clenching. MMA was not associated with self-reported oral behaviours, but a significant association was found with somatisation scores (p < 0.05). Individuals with higher somatisation scores experienced more MMA contraction episodes compared to those with lower scores (R = 0.47; p = 0.015).
Conclusions: Wearing an aligner does not influence either perceived or objectively assessed clenching over the short term. Self-reported clenching is not a reliable measure of actual clenching behaviours. Somatisation appears to be a key mediator in the relationship between clenching and clear aligner wear.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation aims to be the most prestigious journal of dental research within all aspects of oral rehabilitation and applied oral physiology. It covers all diagnostic and clinical management aspects necessary to re-establish a subjective and objective harmonious oral function.
Oral rehabilitation may become necessary as a result of developmental or acquired disturbances in the orofacial region, orofacial traumas, or a variety of dental and oral diseases (primarily dental caries and periodontal diseases) and orofacial pain conditions. As such, oral rehabilitation in the twenty-first century is a matter of skilful diagnosis and minimal, appropriate intervention, the nature of which is intimately linked to a profound knowledge of oral physiology, oral biology, and dental and oral pathology.
The scientific content of the journal therefore strives to reflect the best of evidence-based clinical dentistry. Modern clinical management should be based on solid scientific evidence gathered about diagnostic procedures and the properties and efficacy of the chosen intervention (e.g. material science, biological, toxicological, pharmacological or psychological aspects). The content of the journal also reflects documentation of the possible side-effects of rehabilitation, and includes prognostic perspectives of the treatment modalities chosen.