Roberta Cimino, Rosaria Bucci, Roberto Rongo, Ambrosina Michelotti, Andrea Deregibus
{"title":"Short-Term Effects of Counselling Versus Occlusal Splint Therapy in TMD Pain Patients on Neck Pain and Dysfunction: A Randomised Trial.","authors":"Roberta Cimino, Rosaria Bucci, Roberto Rongo, Ambrosina Michelotti, Andrea Deregibus","doi":"10.1111/joor.70040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Cervical spine impairments are frequent findings among patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). Previous studies have demonstrated that treatments targeting the upper cervical region can improve pain symptoms in patients with TMD. The aim of the current study was to assess whether counselling alone and counselling plus occlusal splint therapy can also provide relief for coexisting neck pain.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>Consecutive adult patients with TMD pain and neck dysfunction were randomised into one treatment group (counselling only-C, or counselling plus occlusal splint-OS). Neck pain was measured using a VAS scale, while neck disability was computed using the Neck Disability Index (NDI). Treatment outcomes were measured after 3-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven patients were recruited for the C group (5 males, 22 females, mean age ± SD: 36.5 ± 11.8 years), while 24 belonged to the OS group (3 males, 21 females, mean age ± SD: 35.5 ± 12.5 years). After the interventions, neck pain score and NDI were significantly reduced in both groups, and no between-groups difference was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both counselling alone and along with occlusal splint therapy effectively reduce neck pain and improve neck function in TMD patients. The findings suggest that occlusal splint does not provide any additional value, as compared to counselling alone, in the achievement of the treatment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.70040","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objective: Cervical spine impairments are frequent findings among patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). Previous studies have demonstrated that treatments targeting the upper cervical region can improve pain symptoms in patients with TMD. The aim of the current study was to assess whether counselling alone and counselling plus occlusal splint therapy can also provide relief for coexisting neck pain.
Subjects and methods: Consecutive adult patients with TMD pain and neck dysfunction were randomised into one treatment group (counselling only-C, or counselling plus occlusal splint-OS). Neck pain was measured using a VAS scale, while neck disability was computed using the Neck Disability Index (NDI). Treatment outcomes were measured after 3-month follow-up.
Results: Twenty-seven patients were recruited for the C group (5 males, 22 females, mean age ± SD: 36.5 ± 11.8 years), while 24 belonged to the OS group (3 males, 21 females, mean age ± SD: 35.5 ± 12.5 years). After the interventions, neck pain score and NDI were significantly reduced in both groups, and no between-groups difference was observed.
Conclusion: Both counselling alone and along with occlusal splint therapy effectively reduce neck pain and improve neck function in TMD patients. The findings suggest that occlusal splint does not provide any additional value, as compared to counselling alone, in the achievement of the treatment outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation aims to be the most prestigious journal of dental research within all aspects of oral rehabilitation and applied oral physiology. It covers all diagnostic and clinical management aspects necessary to re-establish a subjective and objective harmonious oral function.
Oral rehabilitation may become necessary as a result of developmental or acquired disturbances in the orofacial region, orofacial traumas, or a variety of dental and oral diseases (primarily dental caries and periodontal diseases) and orofacial pain conditions. As such, oral rehabilitation in the twenty-first century is a matter of skilful diagnosis and minimal, appropriate intervention, the nature of which is intimately linked to a profound knowledge of oral physiology, oral biology, and dental and oral pathology.
The scientific content of the journal therefore strives to reflect the best of evidence-based clinical dentistry. Modern clinical management should be based on solid scientific evidence gathered about diagnostic procedures and the properties and efficacy of the chosen intervention (e.g. material science, biological, toxicological, pharmacological or psychological aspects). The content of the journal also reflects documentation of the possible side-effects of rehabilitation, and includes prognostic perspectives of the treatment modalities chosen.