Outcomes of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Patients with COVID-19 and Pulmonary Hypertension: An ELSO Registry Analysis.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Raysa Morales-Demori, Jamel Ortoleva, Sukru Aras, Marc Anders
{"title":"Outcomes of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Patients with COVID-19 and Pulmonary Hypertension: An ELSO Registry Analysis.","authors":"Raysa Morales-Demori, Jamel Ortoleva, Sukru Aras, Marc Anders","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.08.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients with COVID-19 infection with acute or chronic pulmonary hypertension (PH) supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). It was hypothesized that patients with acute or chronic PH supported by ECMO would have higher mortality rates compared to those without a diagnosis of PH.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Global registry data from patients who received ECMO support for severe COVID-19 between 2020 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients with COVID-19 who required ECMO support, categorized into those with acute PH (177 patients), chronic PH (147 patients), and no PH (7465 patients).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None (retrospective study).</p><p><strong>Measurements & main results: </strong>Overall, there were no statistically significant differences in mortality among the 3 groups (52.2% for No-PH v 52.0% for Acute-PH v 61.9% for Chronic-PH; p = 0.07). Venoarterial ECMO was used most frequently in Acute-PH (17.5%, compared to 5.2% for No-PH and 6.8% for Chronic-PH; p < 0.001). Patients with chronic PH had more liver disease (26.5%, compared to 3.0% for No-PH and 4.0% for Chronic-PH; p < 0.0001). Patients with chronic PH had the highest overall complication rate (84.4%, compared to 70.0% for No-PH and 78.5% for Acute-PH; p < 0.0001), although the Acute-PH group had the highest incidences of limb ischemia and neurologic complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with acute or chronic PH who required ECMO for severe COVID-19 had higher risk profiles compared to those without PH. While outcomes for patients with acute PH were similar to those for patients without PH, the complication rate was significantly higher in acute PH. Chronic PH was associated with significantly higher, (although nonprohibitive) mortality and a higher risk of complications. Thoughtful patient selection is important for optimal outcomes in this high-risk population.</p>","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2025.08.008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients with COVID-19 infection with acute or chronic pulmonary hypertension (PH) supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). It was hypothesized that patients with acute or chronic PH supported by ECMO would have higher mortality rates compared to those without a diagnosis of PH.

Design: A retrospective analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry.

Setting: Global registry data from patients who received ECMO support for severe COVID-19 between 2020 and 2021.

Participants: Patients with COVID-19 who required ECMO support, categorized into those with acute PH (177 patients), chronic PH (147 patients), and no PH (7465 patients).

Interventions: None (retrospective study).

Measurements & main results: Overall, there were no statistically significant differences in mortality among the 3 groups (52.2% for No-PH v 52.0% for Acute-PH v 61.9% for Chronic-PH; p = 0.07). Venoarterial ECMO was used most frequently in Acute-PH (17.5%, compared to 5.2% for No-PH and 6.8% for Chronic-PH; p < 0.001). Patients with chronic PH had more liver disease (26.5%, compared to 3.0% for No-PH and 4.0% for Chronic-PH; p < 0.0001). Patients with chronic PH had the highest overall complication rate (84.4%, compared to 70.0% for No-PH and 78.5% for Acute-PH; p < 0.0001), although the Acute-PH group had the highest incidences of limb ischemia and neurologic complications.

Conclusions: Patients with acute or chronic PH who required ECMO for severe COVID-19 had higher risk profiles compared to those without PH. While outcomes for patients with acute PH were similar to those for patients without PH, the complication rate was significantly higher in acute PH. Chronic PH was associated with significantly higher, (although nonprohibitive) mortality and a higher risk of complications. Thoughtful patient selection is important for optimal outcomes in this high-risk population.

COVID-19合并肺动脉高压患者体外膜氧合的结局:ELSO登记分析
目的:探讨体外膜氧合(ECMO)支持下新冠肺炎(COVID-19)感染急性或慢性肺动脉高压(PH)患者的特点及预后。假设ECMO支持的急性或慢性PH患者的死亡率高于未诊断PH的患者。设计:对体外生命支持组织登记的回顾性分析。研究背景:2020年至2021年期间接受ECMO支持的重症COVID-19患者的全球注册数据。参与者:需要ECMO支持的COVID-19患者,分为急性PH(177例)、慢性PH(147例)和无PH(7465例)。干预措施:无(回顾性研究)。测量和主要结果:总体而言,三组患者的死亡率无统计学差异(无ph为52.2%,急性ph为52.0%,慢性ph为61.9%,p = 0.07)。静脉ECMO最常用于急性ph(17.5%,非ph为5.2%,慢性ph为6.8%;p < 0.001)。慢性PH患者有更多的肝脏疾病(26.5%,非PH患者为3.0%,慢性PH患者为4.0%,p < 0.0001)。慢性PH患者的总并发症发生率最高(84.4%,非PH为70.0%,急性PH为78.5%,p < 0.0001),尽管急性PH组肢体缺血和神经系统并发症发生率最高。结论:与非PH患者相比,急性或慢性PH患者需要ECMO治疗严重COVID-19的风险更高。虽然急性PH患者的结果与非PH患者相似,但急性PH患者的并发症发生率显着更高。慢性PH与显着更高(尽管非禁止性)的死亡率和更高的并发症风险相关。考虑周到的患者选择是重要的,在这一高危人群的最佳结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
17.90%
发文量
606
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia is primarily aimed at anesthesiologists who deal with patients undergoing cardiac, thoracic or vascular surgical procedures. JCVA features a multidisciplinary approach, with contributions from cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgeons, cardiologists, and other related specialists. Emphasis is placed on rapid publication of clinically relevant material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信