A predictive nomogram for peritoneal injury during totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: A retrospective cohort study.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Journal of International Medical Research Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-03 DOI:10.1177/03000605251372434
Jingbin Wang, Yuanfang Sun, Yanhao Sun
{"title":"A predictive nomogram for peritoneal injury during totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Jingbin Wang, Yuanfang Sun, Yanhao Sun","doi":"10.1177/03000605251372434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivePeritoneal injury is a common complication during totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair, potentially affecting surgical outcomes and patient recovery. Identifying risk factors associated with peritoneal injury is crucial to improving surgical techniques and optimizing patient care.MethodsThis retrospective study analyzed data from 334 patients who underwent totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair between August 2019 and April 2024. Patients were divided into two groups based on the occurrence of peritoneal injury: injury group (<i>n</i> = 69) and noninjury group (<i>n</i> = 265). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses identified independent risk factors for peritoneal injury. A predictive nomogram was constructed using significant variables from the multivariate analysis. The performance of the nomogram was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration plots, and decision curve analysis.ResultsPeritoneal injury occurred in 20.7% of the cases. Multivariate analysis identified the following five independent risk factors: anatomical misrecognition (odds ratio: 7.55; p = 0.005), insufficient peritoneal tension (odds ratio: 2.95; p = 0.007), hernial sac diameter ≥4 cm (odds ratio: 2.75; p = 0.008), prior infraumbilical surgery (odds ratio: 2.50; p = 0.021), and use of sharp medial hernia sac dissection techniques (odds ratio: 5.20; p = 0.006). Body mass index was a significant factor in univariate analysis (p = 0.004) but not in multivariate analysis (p = 0.180). The nomogram demonstrated good discriminative ability (AUC = 0.841) and calibration. The decision curve analysis indicated that the nomogram provided clinical utility across a range of threshold probabilities.ConclusionsThe study identified key risk factors for peritoneal injury during totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair and developed a predictive nomogram with strong discriminative ability. Awareness of these factors enables surgeons to preoperatively stratify risk based on imaging-assessed hernia characteristics and patient history, thereby guiding technique selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":16129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Medical Research","volume":"53 9","pages":"3000605251372434"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12409048/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605251372434","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectivePeritoneal injury is a common complication during totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair, potentially affecting surgical outcomes and patient recovery. Identifying risk factors associated with peritoneal injury is crucial to improving surgical techniques and optimizing patient care.MethodsThis retrospective study analyzed data from 334 patients who underwent totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair between August 2019 and April 2024. Patients were divided into two groups based on the occurrence of peritoneal injury: injury group (n = 69) and noninjury group (n = 265). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses identified independent risk factors for peritoneal injury. A predictive nomogram was constructed using significant variables from the multivariate analysis. The performance of the nomogram was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration plots, and decision curve analysis.ResultsPeritoneal injury occurred in 20.7% of the cases. Multivariate analysis identified the following five independent risk factors: anatomical misrecognition (odds ratio: 7.55; p = 0.005), insufficient peritoneal tension (odds ratio: 2.95; p = 0.007), hernial sac diameter ≥4 cm (odds ratio: 2.75; p = 0.008), prior infraumbilical surgery (odds ratio: 2.50; p = 0.021), and use of sharp medial hernia sac dissection techniques (odds ratio: 5.20; p = 0.006). Body mass index was a significant factor in univariate analysis (p = 0.004) but not in multivariate analysis (p = 0.180). The nomogram demonstrated good discriminative ability (AUC = 0.841) and calibration. The decision curve analysis indicated that the nomogram provided clinical utility across a range of threshold probabilities.ConclusionsThe study identified key risk factors for peritoneal injury during totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair and developed a predictive nomogram with strong discriminative ability. Awareness of these factors enables surgeons to preoperatively stratify risk based on imaging-assessed hernia characteristics and patient history, thereby guiding technique selection.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中腹膜损伤的预测图:一项回顾性队列研究。
目的腹膜损伤是腹股沟疝全腹膜外修补术的常见并发症,严重影响手术效果和患者康复。识别与腹膜损伤相关的危险因素对于提高手术技术和优化患者护理至关重要。方法回顾性分析2019年8月至2024年4月接受腹股沟疝全腹膜外修补术的334例患者的资料。根据腹膜损伤的发生情况将患者分为两组:损伤组(n = 69)和非损伤组(n = 265)。单因素和多因素logistic回归分析确定了腹膜损伤的独立危险因素。使用多变量分析中的显著变量构建预测nomogram。利用接收机工作特征曲线(AUC)下的面积、校准图和决策曲线分析来评估nomogram的性能。结果腹腔损伤发生率为20.7%。多变量分析发现以下5个独立的风险因素:解剖作品点出(优势比:7.55;p = 0.005),腹膜张力不足(优势比:2.95;p = 0.007),疝囊直径≥4 厘米(优势比:2.75;p = 0.008),之前infraumbilical手术(优势比:2.50;p = 0.021),并使用锋利的内侧疝囊解剖技术(优势比:5.20;p = 0.006)。体重指数在单因素分析中是显著因素(p = 0.004),在多因素分析中不显著(p = 0.180)。nomogram具有良好的判别能力(AUC = 0.841)。决策曲线分析表明,nomogram在一系列阈值概率范围内提供了临床效用。结论本研究确定了腹股沟疝全腹膜外修补术中腹膜损伤的关键危险因素,并建立了判别能力强的预测图。对这些因素的认识使外科医生能够根据影像学评估的疝特征和患者病史进行术前风险分层,从而指导技术选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: _Journal of International Medical Research_ is a leading international journal for rapid publication of original medical, pre-clinical and clinical research, reviews, preliminary and pilot studies on a page charge basis. As a service to authors, every article accepted by peer review will be given a full technical edit to make papers as accessible and readable to the international medical community as rapidly as possible. Once the technical edit queries have been answered to the satisfaction of the journal, the paper will be published and made available freely to everyone under a creative commons licence. Symposium proceedings, summaries of presentations or collections of medical, pre-clinical or clinical data on a specific topic are welcome for publication as supplements. Print ISSN: 0300-0605
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信