Markus Benedikt Krueger, Thomas Werncke, Marcel Eicke, Nicolaus Schwerk, Jan Eckstein, Carolin Huisinga, Christoph Panknin, Hoen-Oh Shin, Farina Josepha Silchmüller, Rebecca Elisabeth Schultze-Florey, Gesine Hansen, Frank Wacker, Susanne Hellms, Diane Miriam Renz
{"title":"Photon-counting Detector CT Enables Pediatric Low-dose Chest Imaging With Further Reduction of Radiation Exposure.","authors":"Markus Benedikt Krueger, Thomas Werncke, Marcel Eicke, Nicolaus Schwerk, Jan Eckstein, Carolin Huisinga, Christoph Panknin, Hoen-Oh Shin, Farina Josepha Silchmüller, Rebecca Elisabeth Schultze-Florey, Gesine Hansen, Frank Wacker, Susanne Hellms, Diane Miriam Renz","doi":"10.1097/RLI.0000000000001234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD CT) offers higher dose efficiency than conventional energy-integrating detector CT (EID CT), which is particularly beneficial for children. Broad evidence is missing whether frequently acquired pediatric low-dose lung imaging can be further improved using PCD CT.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare radiation exposure, quantitative and qualitative image quality of pediatric low-dose chest PCD CT versus EID CT examinations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Unenhanced low-dose chest PCD CT and EID CT examinations acquired for clinical indications were retrospectively compared. Cohorts were matched by water-equivalent diameter (Dw) and age (n=44 each; median age 6.3 y PCD CT vs. 7.4 y EID CT). Radiation exposure was analyzed by volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose length product (DLP), and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE). Quantitative image quality assessment featured the placement of regions of interest (ROIs) in the lung, heart, and liver for the extraction of mean attenuation, noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and figures of merit (FOMs). Qualitative image quality was evaluated by 3 readers using Likert scales and additional direct comparisons in a blinded manner.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Weight, height, and body mass index (BMI) were not significantly different between the 2 cohorts (P>0.05). PCD CT examinations showed lower median CTDIvol (0.27 vs. 0.39 mGy, P<0.0001), DLP (6.71 vs. 8.75 mGy*cm, P<0.0001), and SSDE (0.55 vs. 0.83 mGy, P<0.0001) compared with EID CT. Mean attenuation [-797.76 vs. -772.50 Hounsfield units (HU), P=0.51], noise (17.82 vs. 17.69 HU, P=0.73), SNR (-46.10 vs. -45.40, P=0.63), and CNR (39.26 vs. 39.76, P=0.68) of lung parenchyma were not significantly different; respective dose efficiency expressed by FOM was higher in PCD CT compared with EID CT (mean 8030 vs. 5482 mGy-1, P<0.0001). Qualitative rating showed equal and overall excellent scores for both cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PCD CT enables pediatric low-dose chest imaging with lower radiation exposure at similar image quality compared with EID CT.</p>","PeriodicalId":14486,"journal":{"name":"Investigative Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000001234","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD CT) offers higher dose efficiency than conventional energy-integrating detector CT (EID CT), which is particularly beneficial for children. Broad evidence is missing whether frequently acquired pediatric low-dose lung imaging can be further improved using PCD CT.
Objective: To compare radiation exposure, quantitative and qualitative image quality of pediatric low-dose chest PCD CT versus EID CT examinations.
Methods: Unenhanced low-dose chest PCD CT and EID CT examinations acquired for clinical indications were retrospectively compared. Cohorts were matched by water-equivalent diameter (Dw) and age (n=44 each; median age 6.3 y PCD CT vs. 7.4 y EID CT). Radiation exposure was analyzed by volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose length product (DLP), and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE). Quantitative image quality assessment featured the placement of regions of interest (ROIs) in the lung, heart, and liver for the extraction of mean attenuation, noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and figures of merit (FOMs). Qualitative image quality was evaluated by 3 readers using Likert scales and additional direct comparisons in a blinded manner.
Results: Weight, height, and body mass index (BMI) were not significantly different between the 2 cohorts (P>0.05). PCD CT examinations showed lower median CTDIvol (0.27 vs. 0.39 mGy, P<0.0001), DLP (6.71 vs. 8.75 mGy*cm, P<0.0001), and SSDE (0.55 vs. 0.83 mGy, P<0.0001) compared with EID CT. Mean attenuation [-797.76 vs. -772.50 Hounsfield units (HU), P=0.51], noise (17.82 vs. 17.69 HU, P=0.73), SNR (-46.10 vs. -45.40, P=0.63), and CNR (39.26 vs. 39.76, P=0.68) of lung parenchyma were not significantly different; respective dose efficiency expressed by FOM was higher in PCD CT compared with EID CT (mean 8030 vs. 5482 mGy-1, P<0.0001). Qualitative rating showed equal and overall excellent scores for both cohorts.
Conclusions: PCD CT enables pediatric low-dose chest imaging with lower radiation exposure at similar image quality compared with EID CT.
期刊介绍:
Investigative Radiology publishes original, peer-reviewed reports on clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, and related modalities. Emphasis is on early and timely publication. Primarily research-oriented, the journal also includes a wide variety of features of interest to clinical radiologists.