Comparative Safety of Baked Egg, Egg Yolk, and Egg White in Young Children with Egg Allergy.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 ALLERGY
Yuki Ohara, Yurika Matsumoto, Mayumi Fujita, Chisato Inuo
{"title":"Comparative Safety of Baked Egg, Egg Yolk, and Egg White in Young Children with Egg Allergy.","authors":"Yuki Ohara, Yurika Matsumoto, Mayumi Fujita, Chisato Inuo","doi":"10.1159/000548298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Baked egg (BE) is generally well tolerated by children with egg allergy, and heated egg yolk (EY) is considered less allergenic than egg white (EW). Although these findings suggest that both BE and EY may be safer options for reintroduction, no studies have directly compared their safety with each other or with heated EW. This study aimed to compare the safety of oral food challenge (OFC) for reintroducing BE, EY, and EW in children with egg allergy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data from patients who underwent OFCs with BE, EY, or EW at the Department of Allergy, Kanagawa Children's Medical Center, between 2014 and 2024. Only patients with a history of acute IgE-mediated allergic reactions (within 2 h of egg ingestion), an EW-specific IgE level ≥0.35 UA/mL, and strict avoidance of egg protein at the time of OFC were eligible for inclusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-seven children under 3 years of age were enrolled (BE group, n = 47; EY group, n = 23; EW group, n = 27). The OFC positive rate was significantly lower in the BE group (0%) compared to the EY (17.4%) and EW (22.2%) groups (p = 0.0011). Although mild skin or gastrointestinal reactions were observed in the EY group, 2 patients in the EW group experienced respiratory reactions. No patient required adrenaline administration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>OFC with a small amount of BE demonstrated a low positivity rate and could be safely performed even in children with a history of egg-induced reactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":13652,"journal":{"name":"International Archives of Allergy and Immunology","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Archives of Allergy and Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548298","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Baked egg (BE) is generally well tolerated by children with egg allergy, and heated egg yolk (EY) is considered less allergenic than egg white (EW). Although these findings suggest that both BE and EY may be safer options for reintroduction, no studies have directly compared their safety with each other or with heated EW. This study aimed to compare the safety of oral food challenge (OFC) for reintroducing BE, EY, and EW in children with egg allergy.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from patients who underwent OFCs with BE, EY, or EW at the Department of Allergy, Kanagawa Children's Medical Center, between 2014 and 2024. Only patients with a history of acute IgE-mediated allergic reactions (within 2 h of egg ingestion), an EW-specific IgE level ≥0.35 UA/mL, and strict avoidance of egg protein at the time of OFC were eligible for inclusion.

Results: Ninety-seven children under 3 years of age were enrolled (BE group, n = 47; EY group, n = 23; EW group, n = 27). The OFC positive rate was significantly lower in the BE group (0%) compared to the EY (17.4%) and EW (22.2%) groups (p = 0.0011). Although mild skin or gastrointestinal reactions were observed in the EY group, 2 patients in the EW group experienced respiratory reactions. No patient required adrenaline administration.

Conclusion: OFC with a small amount of BE demonstrated a low positivity rate and could be safely performed even in children with a history of egg-induced reactions.

烤鸡蛋、蛋黄和蛋清对鸡蛋过敏幼儿的安全性比较。
简介:对鸡蛋过敏的儿童通常对烤鸡蛋(BE)耐受良好,而加热蛋黄(EY)被认为比蛋清(EW)更不容易过敏。尽管这些发现表明BE和EY可能是重新引入的更安全的选择,但没有研究直接比较它们彼此或加热EW的安全性。本研究旨在比较口服食物刺激(OFC)对鸡蛋过敏儿童重新引入BE、EY和EW的安全性。方法:我们回顾性分析2014年至2024年间在神奈川县儿童医疗中心过敏科接受有BE、EY或EW的OFCs患者的数据。只有有急性IgE介导的过敏反应史(摄入鸡蛋后2小时内),蛋清特异性IgE水平≥0.35 UA/mL,并在OFC时严格避免鸡蛋蛋白的患者才有资格纳入。结果:纳入97例3岁以下儿童(BE组,n = 47; EY组,n = 23; EW组,n = 27)。BE组OFC阳性率(0%)明显低于EY组(17.4%)和EW组(22.2%)(P = 0.0011)。虽然在EY组中观察到轻微的皮肤或胃肠道反应,但EW组中有2例患者出现呼吸道症状。没有病人需要肾上腺素管理。结论:少量BE的OFC阳性率低,即使对有蛋源性反应史的儿童也可安全进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
105
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ''International Archives of Allergy and Immunology'' provides a forum for basic and clinical research in modern molecular and cellular allergology and immunology. Appearing monthly, the journal publishes original work in the fields of allergy, immunopathology, immunogenetics, immunopharmacology, immunoendocrinology, tumor immunology, mucosal immunity, transplantation and immunology of infectious and connective tissue diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信