{"title":"Personality Disorder Severity-ICD-11 Scale and CPTSD ICD-11 Scale: examining possible psychometric properties and diagnostic concept overlap.","authors":"Ohad Gilbar","doi":"10.1080/20008066.2025.2541472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The new way of categorising ICD-11 Personality Disorder (PD) moved from categorical PD types to a dimension of PD severity. This change has raised a debate regarding the question of whether the new PDS-ICD-11 possibly overlaps with Complex Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (CPTSD) clusters, specifically the Disturbances in Self-Organization (DSO) cluster. Both disorders, PD and CPTSD, contain self and interpersonal impairment; moreover, as both are trauma-based disorders, it is unclear if different trauma risk factors apply to each.<b>Objective:</b> The current study had two aims: first, to use the new PDS-ICD-11 severity scale (PDS) to assess the psychometric properties of PD in a unique population of male perpetrators of intimate partner violence who suffer from high levels of PD and CPTSD: second, to examine whether exposure to different types of traumatic events and attachment styles would be associated differently with PD and with CPTSD clusters.<b>Method:</b> Participants were 116 males receiving treatment at 18 domestic violence centres. Data were collected using the International Trauma Questionnaire and the PDS-ICD-11 (Hebrew versions).<b>Results:</b> Confirmatory factor analysis supported the factorial validity of PDS-ICD-11, after removing the self-injury symptom. Cumulative childhood trauma and anxiety attachment were associated with PD, PTSD, and DSO, while recent exposure to trauma and avoidance attachment was associated only with DSO.<b>Conclusions:</b> The study supports the psychometric of construct distinction within the new PDS-ICD-11 scale's definitions of PD and CPTSD. Specifically, it supports the distinctions even where there is similar content of DSO and PD dysfunction of the self and interpersonal impairment. The absence of significant differences in risk factors relating to childhood trauma exposure and psychological injuries support the understanding that all diagnoses shared the same aetiological risk factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":12055,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","volume":"16 1","pages":"2541472"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12412322/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2541472","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The new way of categorising ICD-11 Personality Disorder (PD) moved from categorical PD types to a dimension of PD severity. This change has raised a debate regarding the question of whether the new PDS-ICD-11 possibly overlaps with Complex Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (CPTSD) clusters, specifically the Disturbances in Self-Organization (DSO) cluster. Both disorders, PD and CPTSD, contain self and interpersonal impairment; moreover, as both are trauma-based disorders, it is unclear if different trauma risk factors apply to each.Objective: The current study had two aims: first, to use the new PDS-ICD-11 severity scale (PDS) to assess the psychometric properties of PD in a unique population of male perpetrators of intimate partner violence who suffer from high levels of PD and CPTSD: second, to examine whether exposure to different types of traumatic events and attachment styles would be associated differently with PD and with CPTSD clusters.Method: Participants were 116 males receiving treatment at 18 domestic violence centres. Data were collected using the International Trauma Questionnaire and the PDS-ICD-11 (Hebrew versions).Results: Confirmatory factor analysis supported the factorial validity of PDS-ICD-11, after removing the self-injury symptom. Cumulative childhood trauma and anxiety attachment were associated with PD, PTSD, and DSO, while recent exposure to trauma and avoidance attachment was associated only with DSO.Conclusions: The study supports the psychometric of construct distinction within the new PDS-ICD-11 scale's definitions of PD and CPTSD. Specifically, it supports the distinctions even where there is similar content of DSO and PD dysfunction of the self and interpersonal impairment. The absence of significant differences in risk factors relating to childhood trauma exposure and psychological injuries support the understanding that all diagnoses shared the same aetiological risk factors.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) is a peer-reviewed open access interdisciplinary journal owned by the European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS). The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) aims to engage scholars, clinicians and researchers in the vital issues of how to understand, prevent and treat the consequences of stress and trauma, including but not limited to, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depressive disorders, substance abuse, burnout, and neurobiological or physical consequences, using the latest research or clinical experience in these areas. The journal shares ESTSS’ mission to advance and disseminate scientific knowledge about traumatic stress. Papers may address individual events, repeated or chronic (complex) trauma, large scale disasters, or violence. Being open access, the European Journal of Psychotraumatology is also evidence of ESTSS’ stand on free accessibility of research publications to a wider community via the web. The European Journal of Psychotraumatology seeks to attract contributions from academics and practitioners from diverse professional backgrounds, including, but not restricted to, those in mental health, social sciences, and health and welfare services. Contributions from outside Europe are welcome. The journal welcomes original basic and clinical research articles that consolidate and expand the theoretical and professional basis of the field of traumatic stress; Review articles including meta-analyses; short communications presenting new ideas or early-stage promising research; study protocols that describe proposed or ongoing research; case reports examining a single individual or event in a real‑life context; clinical practice papers sharing experience from the clinic; letters to the Editor debating articles already published in the Journal; inaugural Lectures; conference abstracts and book reviews. Both quantitative and qualitative research is welcome.