Impact of Diabetic Donor Grafts in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Luisa Matterne, André M Trouvain, Marie Della Volpe-Waizel, Alexander Wolf, Warda Darwisch, Silke Wahl, Peter Szurman, Berthold Seitz, Fabian Fries, Annekatrin Rickmann
{"title":"Impact of Diabetic Donor Grafts in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.","authors":"Luisa Matterne, André M Trouvain, Marie Della Volpe-Waizel, Alexander Wolf, Warda Darwisch, Silke Wahl, Peter Szurman, Berthold Seitz, Fabian Fries, Annekatrin Rickmann","doi":"10.1097/ICO.0000000000003977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the impact of donor diabetes mellitus on donor corneal tissue in organ culture on graft preparation, surgical outcomes, and graft survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective comparison of 273 eyes (218 patients) undergoing DMEK, divided into 2 subgroups [0: donor without diabetes (n = 210); D: donor with diabetes (n = 63)]. The data of visual acuity (VA), central corneal thickness (CCT) and endothelial cell count (ECC), and intra- and postoperative complications were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Donor ECC was comparable in both groups (group 0: 2618 ± 183 cells/mm2 vs. group D 2556 ± 218 cells/mm2; P = 1.0). Preparation was slightly more difficult in group D (25% vs. 20%; P = 0.45), as peripheral tears occurred more frequently (25% vs. 16%; P = 0.08), however, these donors were also significantly more frequently already pseudophakic (59% vs. 35%; P = 0.001). The scrolling behavior of the graft and the intraoperative difficulties in the anterior chamber were comparable in both groups. Preparation time and difficulties during preparation or implantation had no significant influence on postoperative rate of rebubbling or repeat DMEK in either group (all P > 0.05). The postoperative outcome was comparable regarding VA, CCT and ECC, rebubbling rate (40% both groups; P = 0.99) and repeat DMEK (group 0: 6% vs. group D: 9%; P = 0.57) during 12-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We could not demonstrate any significant differences in graft preparation using the liquid-bubble technique in organ culture conditions, nor in postoperative outcomes after DMEK, between corneas from diabetic and nondiabetic donors. However, further prospective research is needed to fully understand the impact of diabetes on corneal transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10710,"journal":{"name":"Cornea","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cornea","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000003977","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the impact of donor diabetes mellitus on donor corneal tissue in organ culture on graft preparation, surgical outcomes, and graft survival.

Methods: Retrospective comparison of 273 eyes (218 patients) undergoing DMEK, divided into 2 subgroups [0: donor without diabetes (n = 210); D: donor with diabetes (n = 63)]. The data of visual acuity (VA), central corneal thickness (CCT) and endothelial cell count (ECC), and intra- and postoperative complications were collected.

Results: Donor ECC was comparable in both groups (group 0: 2618 ± 183 cells/mm2 vs. group D 2556 ± 218 cells/mm2; P = 1.0). Preparation was slightly more difficult in group D (25% vs. 20%; P = 0.45), as peripheral tears occurred more frequently (25% vs. 16%; P = 0.08), however, these donors were also significantly more frequently already pseudophakic (59% vs. 35%; P = 0.001). The scrolling behavior of the graft and the intraoperative difficulties in the anterior chamber were comparable in both groups. Preparation time and difficulties during preparation or implantation had no significant influence on postoperative rate of rebubbling or repeat DMEK in either group (all P > 0.05). The postoperative outcome was comparable regarding VA, CCT and ECC, rebubbling rate (40% both groups; P = 0.99) and repeat DMEK (group 0: 6% vs. group D: 9%; P = 0.57) during 12-month follow-up.

Conclusions: We could not demonstrate any significant differences in graft preparation using the liquid-bubble technique in organ culture conditions, nor in postoperative outcomes after DMEK, between corneas from diabetic and nondiabetic donors. However, further prospective research is needed to fully understand the impact of diabetes on corneal transplantation.

糖尿病供体移植物对角膜内皮成形术的影响。
目的:探讨供体糖尿病对器官培养中供体角膜组织对移植物制备、手术效果和移植物存活的影响。方法:回顾性比较273只眼(218例)DMEK患者,分为2个亚组[0:无糖尿病供体(n = 210);D:糖尿病供体(n = 63)]。收集视力(VA)、角膜中央厚度(CCT)、内皮细胞计数(ECC)、术中及术后并发症等数据。结果:两组供体ECC具有可比性(0组:2618±183个细胞/mm2 vs. D组:2556±218个细胞/mm2; P = 1.0)。D组的准备工作稍微困难一些(25% vs. 20%, P = 0.45),因为外周撕裂发生的频率更高(25% vs. 16%, P = 0.08),然而,这些供者也明显更频繁地已经是假性晶状体(59% vs. 35%, P = 0.001)。两组移植物的滚动行为和术中前房的困难具有可比性。两组制备时间、制备或植入困难程度对术后DMEK再泡率和重复率无显著影响(P < 0.05)。术后随访12个月,VA、CCT和ECC、再泡率(两组均为40%,P = 0.99)和重复DMEK(0组为6%,D组为9%,P = 0.57)的结果具有可比性。结论:我们不能证明在器官培养条件下使用液泡技术制备移植物,也不能证明糖尿病和非糖尿病供体角膜在DMEK后的术后结果有任何显著差异。然而,为了充分了解糖尿病对角膜移植的影响,还需要进一步的前瞻性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cornea
Cornea 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
10.70%
发文量
354
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: For corneal specialists and for all general ophthalmologists with an interest in this exciting subspecialty, Cornea brings together the latest clinical and basic research on the cornea and the anterior segment of the eye. Each volume is peer-reviewed by Cornea''s board of world-renowned experts and fully indexed in archival format. Your subscription brings you the latest developments in your field and a growing library of valuable professional references. Sponsored by The Cornea Society which was founded as the Castroviejo Cornea Society in 1975.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信