Transpulmonary bubble transit in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 pneumonia.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Hooman Poor, Adeel Abbasi, Daniel Howell, Alexandra Reynolds, Kaitlin Reilly-Kit, Kevin Rurak, Maya Cohen, Grayson Baird, Lilian Worst, Elizabeth Shin, Paul Yu, Alison Lee, Corey E Ventetuolo
{"title":"Transpulmonary bubble transit in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 pneumonia.","authors":"Hooman Poor, Adeel Abbasi, Daniel Howell, Alexandra Reynolds, Kaitlin Reilly-Kit, Kevin Rurak, Maya Cohen, Grayson Baird, Lilian Worst, Elizabeth Shin, Paul Yu, Alison Lee, Corey E Ventetuolo","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We previously demonstrated a high prevalence of transpulmonary bubble transit (TPBT) using transcranial Doppler (TCD) in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, but these observations require confirmation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients at two academic medical centres, hospitalised with COVID-19 pneumonia and requiring any form of respiratory support, were studied. The first TCD study was performed at the time of enrolment and repeated approximately 7 and 14 days later if participants remained hospitalised.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>91 participants were enrolled. At the first TCD, 14 participants (15%) were receiving oxygen by nasal cannula, 41 participants (45%) were receiving oxygen by high flow nasal cannula, 8 participants (9%) were receiving non-invasive positive pressure, 28 participants (31%) were receiving mechanical ventilation and 2 participants (2%) were receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. 33 participants (36%) demonstrated TPBT at the first TCD. There was evidence that the presence of TPBT and increased heart rate together was associated with in-hospital death (p=0.02). For every one-unit increase in heart rate, the odds of death increased 11% (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.20, p=0.01) for those with TPBT; however, there was no evidence of this increase for those without TPBT (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.05, p=0.76). For participants with subsequent TCD assessments, 55% demonstrated TPBT during the second TCD assessment, and 85% demonstrated TPBT at the third TCD assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prevalence of TPBT in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 pneumonia is higher than expected and the presence of TPBT increases over time in those that remained alive and hospitalised. In patients with TPBT, increased heart rate, a marker of hyperdynamic circulation, is associated with increased mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12410680/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002912","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We previously demonstrated a high prevalence of transpulmonary bubble transit (TPBT) using transcranial Doppler (TCD) in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, but these observations require confirmation.

Methods: Patients at two academic medical centres, hospitalised with COVID-19 pneumonia and requiring any form of respiratory support, were studied. The first TCD study was performed at the time of enrolment and repeated approximately 7 and 14 days later if participants remained hospitalised.

Results: 91 participants were enrolled. At the first TCD, 14 participants (15%) were receiving oxygen by nasal cannula, 41 participants (45%) were receiving oxygen by high flow nasal cannula, 8 participants (9%) were receiving non-invasive positive pressure, 28 participants (31%) were receiving mechanical ventilation and 2 participants (2%) were receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. 33 participants (36%) demonstrated TPBT at the first TCD. There was evidence that the presence of TPBT and increased heart rate together was associated with in-hospital death (p=0.02). For every one-unit increase in heart rate, the odds of death increased 11% (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.20, p=0.01) for those with TPBT; however, there was no evidence of this increase for those without TPBT (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.05, p=0.76). For participants with subsequent TCD assessments, 55% demonstrated TPBT during the second TCD assessment, and 85% demonstrated TPBT at the third TCD assessment.

Conclusions: The prevalence of TPBT in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 pneumonia is higher than expected and the presence of TPBT increases over time in those that remained alive and hospitalised. In patients with TPBT, increased heart rate, a marker of hyperdynamic circulation, is associated with increased mortality.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

COVID-19肺炎住院患者的肺泡转运。
背景:我们之前使用经颅多普勒(TCD)证实了COVID-19肺炎患者中经肺泡传输(TPBT)的高患病率,但这些观察结果需要证实。方法:对两家学术医疗中心因COVID-19肺炎住院并需要任何形式呼吸支持的患者进行研究。第一次TCD研究在入组时进行,如果参与者仍住院,则在大约7天和14天后重复进行。结果:91名受试者入组。第一次TCD时,14例(15%)患者接受鼻插管供氧,41例(45%)患者接受高流量鼻插管供氧,8例(9%)患者接受无创正压,28例(31%)患者接受机械通气,2例(2%)患者接受体外膜氧合。33名参与者(36%)在第一次TCD时表现出TPBT。有证据表明,TPBT和心率增加与院内死亡相关(p=0.02)。心率每增加一个单位,TPBT患者的死亡几率增加11% (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02 ~ 1.20, p=0.01);然而,没有证据表明没有TPBT的患者有这种增加(OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.97 ~ 1.05, p=0.76)。在随后的TCD评估中,55%的参与者在第二次TCD评估中表现出TPBT, 85%的参与者在第三次TCD评估中表现出TPBT。结论:COVID-19肺炎住院患者中TPBT的患病率高于预期,并且在存活和住院的患者中,TPBT的存在随着时间的推移而增加。在TPBT患者中,心率增加(高动力循环的标志)与死亡率增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
BMJ Open Respiratory Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
95
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Respiratory Research is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing respiratory and critical care medicine. It is the sister journal to Thorax and co-owned by the British Thoracic Society and BMJ. The journal focuses on robustness of methodology and scientific rigour with less emphasis on novelty or perceived impact. BMJ Open Respiratory Research operates a rapid review process, with continuous publication online, ensuring timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal publishes review articles and all research study types: Basic science including laboratory based experiments and animal models, Pilot studies or proof of concept, Observational studies, Study protocols, Registries, Clinical trials from phase I to multicentre randomised clinical trials, Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信