Genetic Analysis of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale isolates; An Australian perspective.

IF 2.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Muhammad Noman Naseem, Sean William Bisset, Zi Ming Heng, Loan To Nguyen, Arif Anwar, Peter Scott, Patrick J Blackall, Conny Turni, Lida Omaleki
{"title":"Genetic Analysis of <i>Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale</i> isolates; An Australian perspective.","authors":"Muhammad Noman Naseem, Sean William Bisset, Zi Ming Heng, Loan To Nguyen, Arif Anwar, Peter Scott, Patrick J Blackall, Conny Turni, Lida Omaleki","doi":"10.1080/03079457.2025.2552314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined the genetic diversity in a collection of field isolates of <i>Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale</i> and compared that with the diversity in the serovars A to D and F to I reference strains and available whole genome sequences. Phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene of the nine Australian isolates and twelve sequences of overseas isolates resulted in six clusters with the Australian isolates not closely related to either the type strain or the serovar reference strains. The suitability of low cost finger-printing techniques, ERIC-PCR and rep-PCR, when applied to <i>O. rhinotracheale</i> were also evaluated. The fingerprints generated through ERIC-PCR were more informative and was subsequently used to examine the genetic diversity of the isolates and the reference strains. The ERIC-PCR patterns confirmed the isolates and strains were quite diverse, with 15 different patterns detected. These results suggested that the Australian isolates were genetically distinct from the overseas strains, consistent with the genetic distinction observed in the phylogenetic study. Whole genome sequences of the Australian isolate BR2963 and the 15 genomes identified as <i>O. rhinotracheale</i> in the Genome Taxonomy Database confirmed that serovars F, K and M form a cluster distinct from other <i>O. rhinotracheale</i> and probably represent a distinct species within the genus <i>Ornithobacterium</i>. As well, the Australian isolate BR2963 had an average nucleotide identity level with the <i>O. rhinotracheale</i> type strain (DSM15997<sup>T</sup>) below the accepted 95% threshold for species suggesting that the isolate is a member of the genus <i>Ornithohbacterium</i> but not within the species <i>rhinotracheale</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":8788,"journal":{"name":"Avian Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"1-27"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avian Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457.2025.2552314","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined the genetic diversity in a collection of field isolates of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale and compared that with the diversity in the serovars A to D and F to I reference strains and available whole genome sequences. Phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene of the nine Australian isolates and twelve sequences of overseas isolates resulted in six clusters with the Australian isolates not closely related to either the type strain or the serovar reference strains. The suitability of low cost finger-printing techniques, ERIC-PCR and rep-PCR, when applied to O. rhinotracheale were also evaluated. The fingerprints generated through ERIC-PCR were more informative and was subsequently used to examine the genetic diversity of the isolates and the reference strains. The ERIC-PCR patterns confirmed the isolates and strains were quite diverse, with 15 different patterns detected. These results suggested that the Australian isolates were genetically distinct from the overseas strains, consistent with the genetic distinction observed in the phylogenetic study. Whole genome sequences of the Australian isolate BR2963 and the 15 genomes identified as O. rhinotracheale in the Genome Taxonomy Database confirmed that serovars F, K and M form a cluster distinct from other O. rhinotracheale and probably represent a distinct species within the genus Ornithobacterium. As well, the Australian isolate BR2963 had an average nucleotide identity level with the O. rhinotracheale type strain (DSM15997T) below the accepted 95% threshold for species suggesting that the isolate is a member of the genus Ornithohbacterium but not within the species rhinotracheale.

鼻气管鸟类杆菌分离株的遗传分析澳大利亚人的观点。
本研究检测了一组野外分离的鼻气管鸟杆菌的遗传多样性,并将其与血清型a ~ D和F ~ I参考菌株的多样性以及现有的全基因组序列进行了比较。对9株澳大利亚分离株和12个海外分离株的16S rRNA基因序列进行系统发育分析,发现澳大利亚分离株与型株和血清型参比株均无亲缘关系。本文还对ERIC-PCR和rep-PCR两种低成本指纹技术应用于鼻气管甲的适用性进行了评价。ERIC-PCR生成的指纹图谱信息丰富,可用于鉴定分离菌株和参考菌株的遗传多样性。ERIC-PCR模式证实了分离株和菌株的多样性,共检测到15种不同的模式。这些结果表明,澳大利亚分离株在遗传上与海外菌株不同,与系统发育研究中观察到的遗传差异一致。澳大利亚分离物BR2963的全基因组序列和基因组分类数据库中鉴定为O. rhinotracheale的15个基因组序列证实,血清型F、K和M形成一个与其他O. rhinotracheale不同的簇,可能代表鸟杆菌属中的一个独特物种。此外,澳大利亚分离物BR2963与O. rhinotracheale型菌株(DSM15997T)的平均核苷酸同源性水平低于95%的公认物种阈值,表明该分离物属于Ornithohbacterium属,但不属于rhinotracheale种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Avian Pathology
Avian Pathology 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
10.70%
发文量
68
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Avian Pathology is the official journal of the World Veterinary Poultry Association and, since its first publication in 1972, has been a leading international journal for poultry disease scientists. It publishes material relevant to the entire field of infectious and non-infectious diseases of poultry and other birds. Accepted manuscripts will contribute novel data of interest to an international readership and will add significantly to knowledge and understanding of diseases, old or new. Subject areas include pathology, diagnosis, detection and characterisation of pathogens, infections of possible zoonotic importance, epidemiology, innate and immune responses, vaccines, gene sequences, genetics in relation to disease and physiological and biochemical changes in response to disease. First and subsequent reports of well-recognized diseases within a country are not acceptable unless they also include substantial new information about the disease or pathogen. Manuscripts on wild or pet birds should describe disease or pathogens in a significant number of birds, recognizing/suggesting serious potential impact on that species or that the disease or pathogen is of demonstrable relevance to poultry. Manuscripts on food-borne microorganisms acquired during or after processing, and those that catalogue the occurrence or properties of microorganisms, are unlikely to be considered for publication in the absence of data linking them to avian disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信