Defining Sex- and Age-Specific Initial Stay Times for Continuous Heavy-Intensity Work in Hot Environments Before Heat-Mitigation Controls Are Implemented-Part B.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Fergus K O'Connor, Kristina-Marie T Janetos, Brodie J Richards, Roberto C Harris-Mostert, Katie E Wagar, Leonidas G Ioannou, James J McCormick, Robert D Meade, Emily J Tetzlaff, Ronald J Sigal, W Shane Journeay, Glen P Kenny
{"title":"Defining Sex- and Age-Specific Initial Stay Times for Continuous Heavy-Intensity Work in Hot Environments Before Heat-Mitigation Controls Are Implemented-Part B.","authors":"Fergus K O'Connor, Kristina-Marie T Janetos, Brodie J Richards, Roberto C Harris-Mostert, Katie E Wagar, Leonidas G Ioannou, James J McCormick, Robert D Meade, Emily J Tetzlaff, Ronald J Sigal, W Shane Journeay, Glen P Kenny","doi":"10.1002/ajim.70015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Industry guidelines recommend work-rest schedules to prevent unsafe core temperature elevations (> 38.0°C or > Δ1.0°C above baseline resting) in an \"average\" worker exposed to occupational heat stress. While permissible initial work durations (initial stay times [IST]) before implementing rest schedules have been suggested, existing data are limited to moderate-intensity efforts.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study was to assess whether factors of sex and age influence IST during heavy-intensity work.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed work durations before reaching unsafe core temperature thresholds (i.e., > 38.0°C or > Δ1.0°C above baseline resting) among young (18-30 years) and older (50-69 years) males and females during simulated heavy-intensity work at 26°C, 29°C, and 32°C wet-bulb globe temperatures (WBGT).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The likelihood of surpassing a core temperature of 38.0°C significantly increased at 32°C WBGT (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 2.0 [1.5, 2.7], p = 0.001), but not at 29°C WBGT (1.1 [0.9, 1.4], p = 0.342), compared to 26°C WBGT. Median (interquartile range) durations to reach 38.0°C across groups were 32 (23-52), 29 (23-47), and 26 (18-35) minutes at 26°C, 29°C, and 32°C WBGT, respectively. The likelihood of reaching Δ1.0°C above baseline resting significantly increased at both 32°C (3.8 [2.6, 5.4], p < 0.001) and 29°C WBGT (1.5 [1.1, 2.0], p < 0.001), with median durations being 55 (40-82), 42 (35-56), and 33 (29-42) min, respectively. Older females were more likely to reach 38.0°C (2.4 [1.3, 4.3], p = 0.004) and Δ1.0°C above baseline resting (2.5 [1.4, 4.7], p = 0.003) compared to young males. No other sex- or age-related differences were detected (p > 0.145).</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>These findings highlight the heightened vulnerability of older females during heavy-intensity occupational heat stress, emphasizing the need for tailored guidelines to ensure equitable workforce protection.</p>","PeriodicalId":7873,"journal":{"name":"American journal of industrial medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of industrial medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.70015","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Industry guidelines recommend work-rest schedules to prevent unsafe core temperature elevations (> 38.0°C or > Δ1.0°C above baseline resting) in an "average" worker exposed to occupational heat stress. While permissible initial work durations (initial stay times [IST]) before implementing rest schedules have been suggested, existing data are limited to moderate-intensity efforts.

Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess whether factors of sex and age influence IST during heavy-intensity work.

Methods: We assessed work durations before reaching unsafe core temperature thresholds (i.e., > 38.0°C or > Δ1.0°C above baseline resting) among young (18-30 years) and older (50-69 years) males and females during simulated heavy-intensity work at 26°C, 29°C, and 32°C wet-bulb globe temperatures (WBGT).

Findings: The likelihood of surpassing a core temperature of 38.0°C significantly increased at 32°C WBGT (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 2.0 [1.5, 2.7], p = 0.001), but not at 29°C WBGT (1.1 [0.9, 1.4], p = 0.342), compared to 26°C WBGT. Median (interquartile range) durations to reach 38.0°C across groups were 32 (23-52), 29 (23-47), and 26 (18-35) minutes at 26°C, 29°C, and 32°C WBGT, respectively. The likelihood of reaching Δ1.0°C above baseline resting significantly increased at both 32°C (3.8 [2.6, 5.4], p < 0.001) and 29°C WBGT (1.5 [1.1, 2.0], p < 0.001), with median durations being 55 (40-82), 42 (35-56), and 33 (29-42) min, respectively. Older females were more likely to reach 38.0°C (2.4 [1.3, 4.3], p = 0.004) and Δ1.0°C above baseline resting (2.5 [1.4, 4.7], p = 0.003) compared to young males. No other sex- or age-related differences were detected (p > 0.145).

Impact: These findings highlight the heightened vulnerability of older females during heavy-intensity occupational heat stress, emphasizing the need for tailored guidelines to ensure equitable workforce protection.

在实施减热控制之前,确定在高温环境中连续高强度工作的性别和年龄特异性初始停留时间。
理由:行业指南推荐工作-休息时间表,以防止暴露于职业性热应激的“普通”工人的不安全核心温度升高(> 38.0°C或> Δ1.0°C高于基线休息)。虽然建议在实施休息计划之前允许的初始工作时间(初始停留时间[IST]),但现有数据仅限于中等强度的工作。目的:本研究的目的是评估性别和年龄因素是否影响高强度工作时的IST。方法:我们评估了年轻(18-30岁)和老年(50-69岁)男性和女性在26°C、29°C和32°C湿球温度(WBGT)下模拟高强度工作时达到不安全核心温度阈值(即> 38.0°C或> Δ1.0°C高于基线休息)之前的工作时长。结果:与26°C WBGT相比,32°C WBGT超过核心温度38.0°C的可能性显著增加(风险比[95%置信区间]:2.0 [1.5,2.7],p = 0.001),但29°C WBGT没有(1.1 [0.9,1.4],p = 0.342)。在26°C、29°C和32°C WBGT下,各组达到38.0°C的中位(四分位数范围)持续时间分别为32(23-52)、29(23-47)和26(18-35)分钟。在32°C时,高于基线静息Δ1.0°C的可能性显著增加(3.8 [2.6,5.4],p 0.145)。影响:这些发现突出了老年女性在高强度职业热应激下的脆弱性,强调需要制定有针对性的指导方针,以确保公平的劳动力保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of industrial medicine
American journal of industrial medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
5.70%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: American Journal of Industrial Medicine considers for publication reports of original research, review articles, instructive case reports, and analyses of policy in the fields of occupational and environmental health and safety. The Journal also accepts commentaries, book reviews and letters of comment and criticism. The goals of the journal are to advance and disseminate knowledge, promote research and foster the prevention of disease and injury. Specific topics of interest include: occupational disease; environmental disease; pesticides; cancer; occupational epidemiology; environmental epidemiology; disease surveillance systems; ergonomics; dust diseases; lead poisoning; neurotoxicology; endocrine disruptors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信