Comparison of fine needle aspiration of thyroid nodules and lymph nodes with 22- and 25-gauge needles: a retrospective study.

IF 1.6 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Annals of Medicine and Surgery Pub Date : 2025-07-30 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1097/MS9.0000000000003664
Mohammad Yahia Alzahrani, Mohammad Sayed Abdelghaffar, Tariq Hashim Adlan
{"title":"Comparison of fine needle aspiration of thyroid nodules and lymph nodes with 22- and 25-gauge needles: a retrospective study.","authors":"Mohammad Yahia Alzahrani, Mohammad Sayed Abdelghaffar, Tariq Hashim Adlan","doi":"10.1097/MS9.0000000000003664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Approximately 15% of fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) procedures are considered inconclusive, caused by various factors such as nodule characteristics, level of expertise, and needle size. Since needle size may play a crucial role in both adequacy of FNAB samples and reduction of complications, our objective was to compare cytology specimen adequacy, blood contamination, and findings in thyroid nodules and lymph nodes using 22- and 25-gauge needles in fine-needle aspiration (FNA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective comparative cohort study was conducted at King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Saudi Arabia. Data were collected from electronic medical records between January and December 2021. An ultrasound-guided FNA procedure was performed. Each nodule was sampled in three passes using a 25-gauge and a 22-gauge fine needle. A total of 153 (115 with thyroid nodules; 57 with 22-gauge and 58 with 25-gauge and 38 with lymph nodes; 21 with 22-gauge and 17 with 25-gauge) cases were included. Data analysis was done using SPSS version 26. All cases were divided into two groups: 22-gauge or 25-gauge needle group. Chi-square test and binary logistic regression were used for comparison.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found. Adequacy rates were 93.9% for thyroid and 97.4% for lymph node samples (<i>P</i> = 0.68). Conclusive diagnoses were 97.4% for thyroid and 94.7% for lymph nodes (<i>P</i> = 0.137). Bloody samples were more frequent in lymph nodes (23.7%) than thyroid (11.3%) (<i>P</i> = 0.111). Needle size did not affect adequacy, but the number of passes was a significant predictor (odds ratio: 0.068, 95% confidence interval: 0.008-0.570, <i>P</i> = 0.013).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlights the importance of the number of passes during the procedure, with a higher number of passes associated with decreased odds of obtaining an adequate sample. The needle size does not significantly impact the various variables assessed.</p>","PeriodicalId":8025,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Medicine and Surgery","volume":"87 9","pages":"5388-5393"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12401229/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000003664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Approximately 15% of fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) procedures are considered inconclusive, caused by various factors such as nodule characteristics, level of expertise, and needle size. Since needle size may play a crucial role in both adequacy of FNAB samples and reduction of complications, our objective was to compare cytology specimen adequacy, blood contamination, and findings in thyroid nodules and lymph nodes using 22- and 25-gauge needles in fine-needle aspiration (FNA).

Materials and methods: A retrospective comparative cohort study was conducted at King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Saudi Arabia. Data were collected from electronic medical records between January and December 2021. An ultrasound-guided FNA procedure was performed. Each nodule was sampled in three passes using a 25-gauge and a 22-gauge fine needle. A total of 153 (115 with thyroid nodules; 57 with 22-gauge and 58 with 25-gauge and 38 with lymph nodes; 21 with 22-gauge and 17 with 25-gauge) cases were included. Data analysis was done using SPSS version 26. All cases were divided into two groups: 22-gauge or 25-gauge needle group. Chi-square test and binary logistic regression were used for comparison.

Results: No significant differences were found. Adequacy rates were 93.9% for thyroid and 97.4% for lymph node samples (P = 0.68). Conclusive diagnoses were 97.4% for thyroid and 94.7% for lymph nodes (P = 0.137). Bloody samples were more frequent in lymph nodes (23.7%) than thyroid (11.3%) (P = 0.111). Needle size did not affect adequacy, but the number of passes was a significant predictor (odds ratio: 0.068, 95% confidence interval: 0.008-0.570, P = 0.013).

Conclusion: The study highlights the importance of the number of passes during the procedure, with a higher number of passes associated with decreased odds of obtaining an adequate sample. The needle size does not significantly impact the various variables assessed.

22号针和25号针细针穿刺甲状腺结节和淋巴结的比较:回顾性研究。
背景:大约15%的细针穿刺活检(FNAB)手术被认为是不确定的,这是由各种因素引起的,如结节特征、专业水平和针头大小。由于针头的大小可能在FNAB样本的充分性和并发症的减少方面起着至关重要的作用,我们的目的是比较22号和25号针头在细针抽吸(FNA)中对甲状腺结节和淋巴结的细胞学样本充分性、血液污染和结果。材料和方法:在沙特阿拉伯法赫德国王专科医院进行了一项回顾性比较队列研究。数据收集自2021年1月至12月的电子病历。超声引导下行FNA手术。每个结节用25号细针和22号细针分三次取样。共纳入153例(甲状腺结节115例,22号管57例,25号管58例,淋巴结38例,22号管21例,25号管17例)。数据分析使用SPSS 26。所有病例分为22号针组和25号针组。比较采用卡方检验和二元logistic回归。结果:两组无显著性差异。甲状腺标本充分率为93.9%,淋巴结标本充分率为97.4% (P = 0.68)。甲状腺的结论性诊断率为97.4%,淋巴结为94.7% (P = 0.137)。淋巴结出血(23.7%)多于甲状腺出血(11.3%)(P = 0.111)。针头大小不影响充分性,但通过次数是一个显著的预测因子(优势比:0.068,95%可信区间:0.008-0.570,P = 0.013)。结论:该研究强调了过程中通过次数的重要性,通过次数越多,获得足够样本的几率就越低。针头大小对评估的各种变量没有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Medicine and Surgery
Annals of Medicine and Surgery MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
5.90%
发文量
1665
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信