Inflammatory blood markers in breast cancer: a narrative review from early detection to therapy response.

IF 1.6 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Annals of Medicine and Surgery Pub Date : 2025-08-05 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1097/MS9.0000000000003687
Emmanuel Ifeanyi Obeagu
{"title":"Inflammatory blood markers in breast cancer: a narrative review from early detection to therapy response.","authors":"Emmanuel Ifeanyi Obeagu","doi":"10.1097/MS9.0000000000003687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Breast cancer remains the most frequently diagnosed malignancy among women worldwide, with early detection and accurate prognostication crucial for improving survival outcomes. While imaging and histopathological analyses are standard diagnostic tools, there is growing interest in cost-effective, minimally invasive biomarkers that can complement existing modalities - particularly in resource-limited settings. This narrative review explores the role of inflammatory blood markers, including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), in breast cancer detection, prognosis, and monitoring of therapeutic response. These markers, derived from routine complete blood counts, reflect the systemic immune landscape and are increasingly associated with tumor progression, treatment resistance, and survival. We also highlight the limitations of these markers, particularly their non-specificity, and compare their utility with established diagnostic and molecular techniques. While not diagnostic alone, these inflammatory indices may serve as adjuncts in clinical decision-making and merit further validation in prospective studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":8025,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Medicine and Surgery","volume":"87 9","pages":"5906-5911"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12401255/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000003687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Breast cancer remains the most frequently diagnosed malignancy among women worldwide, with early detection and accurate prognostication crucial for improving survival outcomes. While imaging and histopathological analyses are standard diagnostic tools, there is growing interest in cost-effective, minimally invasive biomarkers that can complement existing modalities - particularly in resource-limited settings. This narrative review explores the role of inflammatory blood markers, including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), in breast cancer detection, prognosis, and monitoring of therapeutic response. These markers, derived from routine complete blood counts, reflect the systemic immune landscape and are increasingly associated with tumor progression, treatment resistance, and survival. We also highlight the limitations of these markers, particularly their non-specificity, and compare their utility with established diagnostic and molecular techniques. While not diagnostic alone, these inflammatory indices may serve as adjuncts in clinical decision-making and merit further validation in prospective studies.

Abstract Image

乳腺癌的炎症血液标志物:从早期发现到治疗反应的叙述性回顾。
乳腺癌仍然是全世界妇女中最常被诊断出的恶性肿瘤,早期发现和准确预测对于改善生存结果至关重要。虽然成像和组织病理学分析是标准的诊断工具,但人们对具有成本效益的微创生物标志物越来越感兴趣,这些生物标志物可以补充现有的模式,特别是在资源有限的情况下。本文探讨了炎症性血液标志物在乳腺癌检测、预后和治疗反应监测中的作用,包括中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)、单核细胞与淋巴细胞比值(MLR)和全身免疫炎症指数(SII)。这些来自常规全血细胞计数的标志物反映了全身免疫状况,并且越来越多地与肿瘤进展、治疗耐药性和生存相关。我们还强调了这些标记的局限性,特别是它们的非特异性,并将它们与现有的诊断和分子技术进行了比较。虽然不能单独诊断,但这些炎症指标可以作为临床决策的辅助因素,值得在前瞻性研究中进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Medicine and Surgery
Annals of Medicine and Surgery MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
5.90%
发文量
1665
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信