Osman Yousafzai MD , Kainat Kanwal MD , Frank Annie PhD , Sarah Rinehart MD
{"title":"One-Year Outcomes in PAD Patients With Elevated Lipoprotein(a): A Propensity-Matched Analysis","authors":"Osman Yousafzai MD , Kainat Kanwal MD , Frank Annie PhD , Sarah Rinehart MD","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.08.045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a genetically determined, proatherogenic lipoprotein linked to increased cardiovascular risk. Although elevated Lp(a) levels have been implicated in peripheral artery disease (PAD) development, their prognostic significance in patients with established PAD remains unclear. To evaluate whether elevated Lp(a) independently predicts short-term cardiovascular and limb outcomes in patients with established PAD. Using the TriNetX Research Network, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults with PAD between January 1, 2010, and January 1, 2025. Patients with Lp(a) measurements were stratified by Lp(a) levels (≥50 mg/dL vs <50 mg/dL). A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) controlled for demographics and cardiovascular comorbidities. Primary outcomes included 1-year rates of myocardial infarction, stroke, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), all-cause mortality, and major adverse limb events (MALE). Among 1,790,984 PAD patients, 3,397 (0.2%) had elevated Lp(a). After PSM, 2 balanced cohorts of 3,397 patients were analyzed. In the unmatched cohort, elevated Lp(a) was associated with higher rates of myocardial infarction, stroke, and MACE, but paradoxically lower all-cause mortality and major adverse limb events (MALE). However, in the matched cohort, these differences were no longer statistically significant, suggesting the initial findings were likely driven by baseline differences and confounding. In patients with established PAD, elevated Lp(a) was not independently associated with increased short-term cardiovascular or limb events after accounting for comorbidities. These findings suggest that Lp(a)’s prognostic value may be limited in secondary prevention settings but could remain relevant for primary prevention and risk stratification. Further prospective studies are needed to assess the utility of Lp(a)-lowering therapies in PAD populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":"258 ","pages":"Pages 24-26"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002914925005065","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a genetically determined, proatherogenic lipoprotein linked to increased cardiovascular risk. Although elevated Lp(a) levels have been implicated in peripheral artery disease (PAD) development, their prognostic significance in patients with established PAD remains unclear. To evaluate whether elevated Lp(a) independently predicts short-term cardiovascular and limb outcomes in patients with established PAD. Using the TriNetX Research Network, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults with PAD between January 1, 2010, and January 1, 2025. Patients with Lp(a) measurements were stratified by Lp(a) levels (≥50 mg/dL vs <50 mg/dL). A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) controlled for demographics and cardiovascular comorbidities. Primary outcomes included 1-year rates of myocardial infarction, stroke, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), all-cause mortality, and major adverse limb events (MALE). Among 1,790,984 PAD patients, 3,397 (0.2%) had elevated Lp(a). After PSM, 2 balanced cohorts of 3,397 patients were analyzed. In the unmatched cohort, elevated Lp(a) was associated with higher rates of myocardial infarction, stroke, and MACE, but paradoxically lower all-cause mortality and major adverse limb events (MALE). However, in the matched cohort, these differences were no longer statistically significant, suggesting the initial findings were likely driven by baseline differences and confounding. In patients with established PAD, elevated Lp(a) was not independently associated with increased short-term cardiovascular or limb events after accounting for comorbidities. These findings suggest that Lp(a)’s prognostic value may be limited in secondary prevention settings but could remain relevant for primary prevention and risk stratification. Further prospective studies are needed to assess the utility of Lp(a)-lowering therapies in PAD populations.
期刊介绍:
Published 24 times a year, The American Journal of Cardiology® is an independent journal designed for cardiovascular disease specialists and internists with a subspecialty in cardiology throughout the world. AJC is an independent, scientific, peer-reviewed journal of original articles that focus on the practical, clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. AJC has one of the fastest acceptance to publication times in Cardiology. Features report on systemic hypertension, methodology, drugs, pacing, arrhythmia, preventive cardiology, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy. Also included are editorials, readers'' comments, and symposia.