Changes in alcohol-related social network composition mediate the effects of AA meeting attendance on drinking following a recovery attempt in adults with alcohol use disorder.

IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Addiction Pub Date : 2025-09-03 DOI:10.1111/add.70172
Emily E Levitt, Liah Rahman, Desmond Singh, Kyla Belisario, Amanda Doggett, Allan Clifton, Robert Stout, John F Kelly, James MacKillop
{"title":"Changes in alcohol-related social network composition mediate the effects of AA meeting attendance on drinking following a recovery attempt in adults with alcohol use disorder.","authors":"Emily E Levitt, Liah Rahman, Desmond Singh, Kyla Belisario, Amanda Doggett, Allan Clifton, Robert Stout, John F Kelly, James MacKillop","doi":"10.1111/add.70172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess whether changes in social network drinking is a mechanism of behaviour change responsible for the benefits of attending Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) during a recovery attempt.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An observational longitudinal cohort study investigating mechanisms of behaviour change among adults with alcohol use disorder (AUD) reporting initiation of a substantial recovery attempt.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Boston, Massachusetts, United States, and Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>From a larger observational cohort, participants were individuals who reported a substantive increase in AA attendance (increase of ≥1 + meetings/week) from baseline to 6 weeks (n = 71) and a propensity score-matched control group of participants who did not increase AA attendance (n = 71). Propensity score matching used demographics and baseline drinking.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Baseline assessment and a 6-week follow-up assessment, including outcome variables: diagnostic assessment of AUD, timeline followback interview [percent drinking days (%DD) and percent heavy drinking days (%HDD)]; and exposure variables: formal egocentric social network assessment collecting egocentric social network metrics and using up to 20 network alters.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Compared with the control group, participants who increased AA participation statistically significantly reduced %DD [mean (M) = 5.67% (standard error of the mean, SEM = 1.81) vs 30.91% (3.59); F = 46.22, P < 0.001] and %HDD [5.21% (1.79) vs 23.32% (3.14); F = 28.34, P < 0.001] and exhibited statistically significantly improved social network indicators including reduced network drinking frequency [1.99 (0.08) vs 2.96 (0.09); F = 42.26, P < 0.001] and severity [1.68 (0.06) vs 2.34 (0.08); F = 40.51, P < 0.001]. Changes in social network drinking statistically significantly mediated the relationship between changes in AA attendance and reductions in %DD [b = -0.06 (0.02), P = 0.01] and %HDD [b = -0.05 (0.02), P = 0.04] at follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reduced social network drinking appears to be one mechanism of behaviour change associated with the positive effects of Alcoholics Anonymous on drinking behavior during recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70172","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To assess whether changes in social network drinking is a mechanism of behaviour change responsible for the benefits of attending Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) during a recovery attempt.

Design: An observational longitudinal cohort study investigating mechanisms of behaviour change among adults with alcohol use disorder (AUD) reporting initiation of a substantial recovery attempt.

Setting: Boston, Massachusetts, United States, and Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Participants: From a larger observational cohort, participants were individuals who reported a substantive increase in AA attendance (increase of ≥1 + meetings/week) from baseline to 6 weeks (n = 71) and a propensity score-matched control group of participants who did not increase AA attendance (n = 71). Propensity score matching used demographics and baseline drinking.

Measurements: Baseline assessment and a 6-week follow-up assessment, including outcome variables: diagnostic assessment of AUD, timeline followback interview [percent drinking days (%DD) and percent heavy drinking days (%HDD)]; and exposure variables: formal egocentric social network assessment collecting egocentric social network metrics and using up to 20 network alters.

Findings: Compared with the control group, participants who increased AA participation statistically significantly reduced %DD [mean (M) = 5.67% (standard error of the mean, SEM = 1.81) vs 30.91% (3.59); F = 46.22, P < 0.001] and %HDD [5.21% (1.79) vs 23.32% (3.14); F = 28.34, P < 0.001] and exhibited statistically significantly improved social network indicators including reduced network drinking frequency [1.99 (0.08) vs 2.96 (0.09); F = 42.26, P < 0.001] and severity [1.68 (0.06) vs 2.34 (0.08); F = 40.51, P < 0.001]. Changes in social network drinking statistically significantly mediated the relationship between changes in AA attendance and reductions in %DD [b = -0.06 (0.02), P = 0.01] and %HDD [b = -0.05 (0.02), P = 0.04] at follow-up.

Conclusions: Reduced social network drinking appears to be one mechanism of behaviour change associated with the positive effects of Alcoholics Anonymous on drinking behavior during recovery.

酒精相关社会网络构成的变化介导了酒精使用障碍成人康复后参加AA会对饮酒的影响。
目的:评估社交网络饮酒的改变是否是一种行为改变的机制,这种行为改变负责在康复尝试期间参加匿名戒酒会(AA)的益处。设计:一项观察性纵向队列研究,调查报告开始实质性恢复尝试的酒精使用障碍(AUD)成人行为改变的机制。地点:美国马萨诸塞州波士顿和加拿大安大略省汉密尔顿。参与者:来自一个更大的观察性队列,参与者是报告AA出席率从基线到6周大幅增加(≥1 +次/周)的个体(n = 71)和倾向得分匹配的对照组参与者,他们没有增加AA出席率(n = 71)。倾向评分匹配使用的人口统计数据和基线饮酒。测量方法:基线评估和6周随访评估,包括结果变量:AUD诊断评估,时间轴随访访谈[饮酒天数百分比(%DD)和重度饮酒天数百分比(%HDD)];暴露变量:正式的以自我为中心的社会网络评估收集以自我为中心的社会网络指标并使用多达20个网络变化。结果:与对照组相比,增加AA参与的参与者显著降低了%DD[平均(M) = 5.67%(平均标准误差,SEM = 1.81) vs 30.91% (3.59);结论:减少社交网络饮酒似乎是行为改变的一种机制,与匿名戒酒会对恢复期间饮酒行为的积极影响有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Addiction
Addiction 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Addiction publishes peer-reviewed research reports on pharmacological and behavioural addictions, bringing together research conducted within many different disciplines. Its goal is to serve international and interdisciplinary scientific and clinical communication, to strengthen links between science and policy, and to stimulate and enhance the quality of debate. We seek submissions that are not only technically competent but are also original and contain information or ideas of fresh interest to our international readership. We seek to serve low- and middle-income (LAMI) countries as well as more economically developed countries. Addiction’s scope spans human experimental, epidemiological, social science, historical, clinical and policy research relating to addiction, primarily but not exclusively in the areas of psychoactive substance use and/or gambling. In addition to original research, the journal features editorials, commentaries, reviews, letters, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信