Gabriel Ángel Aguirre-Pérez, Isabel-María García-Sánchez
{"title":"Influence of CEO Attributes on Sustainability: From a Bibliometric Overview to a Systematic Review of the Socio-Psychological Aspects","authors":"Gabriel Ángel Aguirre-Pérez, Isabel-María García-Sánchez","doi":"10.1002/csr.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The responsibility of Chief Executive Officers (CEO) in proposing and integrating sustainability into corporate strategies has sparked academic interest. In order to provide a comprehensive understanding of this trending scientific field, this article aims to synthesize current knowledge on the role of CEO characteristics on corporate sustainability, identify limitations and knowledge gaps in the existing literature, and formulate a holistic and ambitious agenda to guide future research. To this end, we categorize CEO attributes into three aspects: functional, demographic, and socio-psychological. Through a bibliometric literature review of 727 articles obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus databases, we analyze the systematic knowledge of diffusion patterns and the evolution of research trends in the field. We observe that current knowledge is mainly focused on the study of the following functional aspects: CEO power and compensation. In addition, scholars have begun to take an interest in CEO gender, education, and marital status as demographic aspects, and CEO narcissism and political ideology as socio-psychological aspects. Furthermore, given that the socio-psychological aspects of CEOs are the most recent and emerging field, a systematic literature review is conducted using a sample of 130 articles to identify limitations and gaps, and to propose an agenda to guide future research. We find that narcissism is a double-edged sword, with both negative and positive effects on sustainability, and that the reasons for these divergences need to be uncovered. In addition, researchers should focus on analyzing the combined effects of other psychological, ethical, cultural, and religious traits that are currently considered in isolation, as well as improving the current measurement of the various traits.</p>","PeriodicalId":48334,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management","volume":"32 5","pages":"6732-6765"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/csr.70021","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/csr.70021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The responsibility of Chief Executive Officers (CEO) in proposing and integrating sustainability into corporate strategies has sparked academic interest. In order to provide a comprehensive understanding of this trending scientific field, this article aims to synthesize current knowledge on the role of CEO characteristics on corporate sustainability, identify limitations and knowledge gaps in the existing literature, and formulate a holistic and ambitious agenda to guide future research. To this end, we categorize CEO attributes into three aspects: functional, demographic, and socio-psychological. Through a bibliometric literature review of 727 articles obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus databases, we analyze the systematic knowledge of diffusion patterns and the evolution of research trends in the field. We observe that current knowledge is mainly focused on the study of the following functional aspects: CEO power and compensation. In addition, scholars have begun to take an interest in CEO gender, education, and marital status as demographic aspects, and CEO narcissism and political ideology as socio-psychological aspects. Furthermore, given that the socio-psychological aspects of CEOs are the most recent and emerging field, a systematic literature review is conducted using a sample of 130 articles to identify limitations and gaps, and to propose an agenda to guide future research. We find that narcissism is a double-edged sword, with both negative and positive effects on sustainability, and that the reasons for these divergences need to be uncovered. In addition, researchers should focus on analyzing the combined effects of other psychological, ethical, cultural, and religious traits that are currently considered in isolation, as well as improving the current measurement of the various traits.
首席执行官(CEO)在提出可持续发展并将其纳入企业战略中的责任引发了学术界的兴趣。为了全面了解这一趋势科学领域,本文旨在综合当前关于CEO特征对企业可持续发展作用的知识,识别现有文献中的局限性和知识空白,并制定一个整体和雄心勃勃的议程,以指导未来的研究。为此,我们将CEO的属性分为三个方面:功能、人口统计学和社会心理学。通过对来自Web of Science和Scopus数据库的727篇文献的文献计量学分析,分析了该领域的传播模式和研究趋势演变的系统知识。我们观察到,目前的知识主要集中在以下职能方面的研究:CEO权力和薪酬。此外,学者们开始将CEO的性别、教育程度和婚姻状况作为人口统计学方面的研究,将CEO的自恋和政治意识形态作为社会心理学方面的研究。此外,鉴于ceo的社会心理方面是最新和新兴的领域,本文使用130篇文章的样本进行了系统的文献综述,以确定局限性和差距,并提出指导未来研究的议程。我们发现自恋是一把双刃剑,对可持续性既有负面影响,也有积极影响,这些差异的原因需要揭示。此外,研究人员应该着重分析目前孤立考虑的其他心理、伦理、文化和宗教特征的综合影响,以及改进目前对各种特征的测量。
期刊介绍:
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management is a journal that publishes both theoretical and practical contributions related to the social and environmental responsibilities of businesses in the context of sustainable development. It covers a wide range of topics, including tools and practices associated with these responsibilities, case studies, and cross-country surveys of best practices. The journal aims to help organizations improve their performance and accountability in these areas.
The main focus of the journal is on research and practical advice for the development and assessment of social responsibility and environmental tools. It also features practical case studies and evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of different approaches to sustainability. The journal encourages the discussion and debate of sustainability issues and closely monitors the demands of various stakeholder groups. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management is a refereed journal, meaning that all contributions undergo a rigorous review process. It seeks high-quality contributions that appeal to a diverse audience from various disciplines.