Organizational Strategic Responses to Climate Challenges in Global Carbon Management

IF 9.1 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Md. Abdul Kaium Masud, Mahfuzur Rahman, Ilhan Ozturk
{"title":"Organizational Strategic Responses to Climate Challenges in Global Carbon Management","authors":"Md. Abdul Kaium Masud,&nbsp;Mahfuzur Rahman,&nbsp;Ilhan Ozturk","doi":"10.1002/csr.70058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Climate change is the most pressing global issue due to its devastating impact on society. This study aims to identify internal and external organizational factors that influence carbon strategy, both directly and indirectly. Utilizing global carbon data from the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP), the study incorporates a theoretical framework based on Institutional Theory and the Resource-Based View to examine theoretical discussions on carbon emissions and environmental performance. The dataset spans 17 countries across three geographical regions and includes 852 firm-year observations from 2018 to 2020. Results reveal that carbon integrity leadership and internal carbon pricing do not significantly impact corporate carbon intensity. However, research and development intensity, financial resource slack, and human resource slack exhibit a negative and significant relationship with carbon intensity. Furthermore, moderation results indicate that firms with high carbon emissions have more robust carbon strategies and R&amp;D investments than low-carbon firms. Country-level analysis shows that the emission trading system negatively and significantly correlates with carbon intensity, highlighting its effectiveness as a regulatory mechanism. However, the findings also emphasize that while regulatory enforcement plays a crucial role in carbon reduction, firms require strategic flexibility to adapt their carbon management approaches in response to evolving market conditions and policy frameworks. The study concludes that an effective carbon strategy drives the achievement of carbon reduction targets, energy efficiency, market leadership, regulatory performance, and the adoption of market mechanisms. It also highlights that many countries lack comprehensive legal frameworks for climate change, environmental protection, and carbon performance, with existing regulations being predominantly voluntary.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48334,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management","volume":"32 5","pages":"6766-6785"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/csr.70058","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Climate change is the most pressing global issue due to its devastating impact on society. This study aims to identify internal and external organizational factors that influence carbon strategy, both directly and indirectly. Utilizing global carbon data from the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP), the study incorporates a theoretical framework based on Institutional Theory and the Resource-Based View to examine theoretical discussions on carbon emissions and environmental performance. The dataset spans 17 countries across three geographical regions and includes 852 firm-year observations from 2018 to 2020. Results reveal that carbon integrity leadership and internal carbon pricing do not significantly impact corporate carbon intensity. However, research and development intensity, financial resource slack, and human resource slack exhibit a negative and significant relationship with carbon intensity. Furthermore, moderation results indicate that firms with high carbon emissions have more robust carbon strategies and R&D investments than low-carbon firms. Country-level analysis shows that the emission trading system negatively and significantly correlates with carbon intensity, highlighting its effectiveness as a regulatory mechanism. However, the findings also emphasize that while regulatory enforcement plays a crucial role in carbon reduction, firms require strategic flexibility to adapt their carbon management approaches in response to evolving market conditions and policy frameworks. The study concludes that an effective carbon strategy drives the achievement of carbon reduction targets, energy efficiency, market leadership, regulatory performance, and the adoption of market mechanisms. It also highlights that many countries lack comprehensive legal frameworks for climate change, environmental protection, and carbon performance, with existing regulations being predominantly voluntary.

组织战略应对全球碳管理中的气候挑战
气候变化因其对社会的破坏性影响而成为最紧迫的全球问题。本研究旨在确定直接和间接影响碳战略的内部和外部组织因素。本研究利用碳信息披露项目(CDP)的全球碳数据,结合基于制度理论和资源基础观的理论框架,对碳排放与环境绩效的理论讨论进行了考察。该数据集涵盖了三个地理区域的17个国家,包括2018年至2020年的852个公司年观测数据。结果表明,碳完整性领导和内部碳定价对企业碳强度没有显著影响。而研发强度、财务资源松弛和人力资源松弛与碳强度呈显著负相关。此外,调节结果表明,高碳排放企业比低碳企业具有更稳健的碳战略和研发投资。国家层面的分析表明,排放交易体系与碳强度呈显著负相关,突出了其作为一种监管机制的有效性。然而,研究结果还强调,尽管监管执法在碳减排中发挥着至关重要的作用,但企业需要战略灵活性来调整其碳管理方法,以适应不断变化的市场条件和政策框架。研究认为,有效的碳战略可以推动碳减排目标的实现、能源效率、市场领导地位、监管绩效和市场机制的采用。报告还强调,许多国家缺乏针对气候变化、环境保护和碳绩效的全面法律框架,现有法规主要是自愿的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.20
自引率
16.30%
发文量
189
期刊介绍: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management is a journal that publishes both theoretical and practical contributions related to the social and environmental responsibilities of businesses in the context of sustainable development. It covers a wide range of topics, including tools and practices associated with these responsibilities, case studies, and cross-country surveys of best practices. The journal aims to help organizations improve their performance and accountability in these areas. The main focus of the journal is on research and practical advice for the development and assessment of social responsibility and environmental tools. It also features practical case studies and evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of different approaches to sustainability. The journal encourages the discussion and debate of sustainability issues and closely monitors the demands of various stakeholder groups. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management is a refereed journal, meaning that all contributions undergo a rigorous review process. It seeks high-quality contributions that appeal to a diverse audience from various disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信