Implicit or Explicit? Understanding Consumer Responses to ESG-Related Claims and ESG Disclosure in the Consumer-Packaged Goods Industry: An Emerging Economy Perspective

IF 9.1 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Abdul Basit Abdul Rahim, Li Wang, Ahmed Rabeeu
{"title":"Implicit or Explicit? Understanding Consumer Responses to ESG-Related Claims and ESG Disclosure in the Consumer-Packaged Goods Industry: An Emerging Economy Perspective","authors":"Abdul Basit Abdul Rahim,&nbsp;Li Wang,&nbsp;Ahmed Rabeeu","doi":"10.1002/csr.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Grounded in signaling and legitimacy theories, this study explores consumers' responses to implicit and explicit ESG-related claims on product labels as well as the moderating effect of ESG disclosure in China's consumer-packaged goods industry. In a two-by-two between-subject experimental design with 329 Chinese consumers across diverse regions, the study reveals that explicit ESG claims generate stronger brand attachment and purchase outcomes compared to implicit claims. Moreover, the study finds support for the moderating role of ESG disclosure such that it amplifies both implicit and explicit ESG-related claims significantly. This study extends both signaling theory and legitimacy theory by explaining the mechanisms through which ESG-related claims and ESG disclosure interact to influence consumer decision-making in an emerging market context, thus filling critical gaps in existing literature. Practically, the study provides actionable strategies for organizations to optimize ESG communication by leveraging both explicit and implicit claims as well as ESG disclosure to drive favorable consumer outcomes.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48334,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management","volume":"32 5","pages":"6031-6047"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/csr.70012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Grounded in signaling and legitimacy theories, this study explores consumers' responses to implicit and explicit ESG-related claims on product labels as well as the moderating effect of ESG disclosure in China's consumer-packaged goods industry. In a two-by-two between-subject experimental design with 329 Chinese consumers across diverse regions, the study reveals that explicit ESG claims generate stronger brand attachment and purchase outcomes compared to implicit claims. Moreover, the study finds support for the moderating role of ESG disclosure such that it amplifies both implicit and explicit ESG-related claims significantly. This study extends both signaling theory and legitimacy theory by explaining the mechanisms through which ESG-related claims and ESG disclosure interact to influence consumer decision-making in an emerging market context, thus filling critical gaps in existing literature. Practically, the study provides actionable strategies for organizations to optimize ESG communication by leveraging both explicit and implicit claims as well as ESG disclosure to drive favorable consumer outcomes.

隐性还是显性?了解消费者对包装消费品行业ESG相关索赔和ESG披露的反应:一个新兴经济体的视角
本研究以信号理论和合法性理论为基础,探讨了消费者对产品标签上隐含和明确的ESG相关声明的反应,以及中国包装消费品行业ESG披露的调节作用。通过对来自不同地区的329名中国消费者进行二对二的实验设计,该研究表明,与隐性诉求相比,显性ESG诉求产生了更强的品牌依恋和购买结果。此外,研究发现支持ESG披露的调节作用,因此它显着放大了隐性和显性ESG相关的权利要求。本研究扩展了信号理论和合法性理论,解释了新兴市场背景下ESG相关索赔和ESG披露相互作用影响消费者决策的机制,从而填补了现有文献中的关键空白。实际上,该研究为组织提供了可操作的策略,通过利用显性和隐性要求以及ESG披露来优化ESG沟通,以推动有利的消费者结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.20
自引率
16.30%
发文量
189
期刊介绍: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management is a journal that publishes both theoretical and practical contributions related to the social and environmental responsibilities of businesses in the context of sustainable development. It covers a wide range of topics, including tools and practices associated with these responsibilities, case studies, and cross-country surveys of best practices. The journal aims to help organizations improve their performance and accountability in these areas. The main focus of the journal is on research and practical advice for the development and assessment of social responsibility and environmental tools. It also features practical case studies and evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of different approaches to sustainability. The journal encourages the discussion and debate of sustainability issues and closely monitors the demands of various stakeholder groups. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management is a refereed journal, meaning that all contributions undergo a rigorous review process. It seeks high-quality contributions that appeal to a diverse audience from various disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信