{"title":"Contextualization and Context Effects: An Integrative Review of Studies on the Outcomes of Diversity Management Practices","authors":"Anna Schlueter, Stefan Gold","doi":"10.1002/csr.70037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Research on the outcomes of diversity management practices has produced inconsistent and even contradictory results. It has been argued that these discrepancies are due to contextual differences between studies. Building on this argument, this integrative review provides an in-depth analysis of context, aiming to gain a deeper understanding of the outcomes of diversity management practices. We used Johns' categorical framework to synthesize the literature and systematically review contextualization and context effects in empirical studies. We offer suggestions for future contextualization, point to under- and unexplored contextual factors, outline ways to advance theorizing, and argue for more complex conceptualizations of contextual factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":48334,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management","volume":"32 5","pages":"6461-6474"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/csr.70037","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/csr.70037","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Research on the outcomes of diversity management practices has produced inconsistent and even contradictory results. It has been argued that these discrepancies are due to contextual differences between studies. Building on this argument, this integrative review provides an in-depth analysis of context, aiming to gain a deeper understanding of the outcomes of diversity management practices. We used Johns' categorical framework to synthesize the literature and systematically review contextualization and context effects in empirical studies. We offer suggestions for future contextualization, point to under- and unexplored contextual factors, outline ways to advance theorizing, and argue for more complex conceptualizations of contextual factors.
期刊介绍：
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management is a journal that publishes both theoretical and practical contributions related to the social and environmental responsibilities of businesses in the context of sustainable development. It covers a wide range of topics, including tools and practices associated with these responsibilities, case studies, and cross-country surveys of best practices. The journal aims to help organizations improve their performance and accountability in these areas.
The main focus of the journal is on research and practical advice for the development and assessment of social responsibility and environmental tools. It also features practical case studies and evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of different approaches to sustainability. The journal encourages the discussion and debate of sustainability issues and closely monitors the demands of various stakeholder groups. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management is a refereed journal, meaning that all contributions undergo a rigorous review process. It seeks high-quality contributions that appeal to a diverse audience from various disciplines.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
