Exploring the Influence of Accounting Reporting Complexity on ESG Disclosure

IF 9.1 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Hamzeh Al Amosh
{"title":"Exploring the Influence of Accounting Reporting Complexity on ESG Disclosure","authors":"Hamzeh Al Amosh","doi":"10.1002/csr.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study investigates the impact of accounting reporting complexity on the quality of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosures, examining both the individual components of ESG reporting and the overall ESG score. Using a sample of 5146 firm-year observations from U.S.-based companies between 2012 and 2021, the study finds a significant negative impact of accounting reporting complexity on both environmental and overall ESG disclosures. This suggests that firms with complex financial reporting structures may be more likely to limit their sustainability-related disclosures, whether due to resource constraints, managerial discretion, or the difficulty of integrating ESG data within an already intricate reporting framework. The study also finds a weaker and only marginally significant negative effect of accounting complexity on social and governance disclosures, indicating that these dimensions may be less susceptible to the challenges posed by complex financial reporting. The findings are analyzed through the combined lenses of agency theory and information manipulation theory (IMT). Complex financial reporting frameworks create conditions conducive to the selective presentation of ESG information, as shareholders and other stakeholders often lack the capacity to verify every data point. From an agency theory standpoint, managers already possess deeper knowledge of firm operations, and intricate accounting systems further expand their discretion in deciding which details to highlight or suppress, limiting outsiders' ability to evaluate true sustainability performance. Meanwhile, information manipulation theory emphasizes how such complexity enables managers to shape disclosures in ways that amplify favorable outcomes while obscuring less impressive results. Consequently, reporting complexity heightens information asymmetry and increases monitoring costs, complicating the disclosure of critical ESG-related data and diminishing the transparency and credibility of sustainability reporting. The practical implications underscore the need for firms to address the transparency challenges posed by complex reporting structures by adopting standardized ESG reporting frameworks that ensure greater comparability and clarity. These findings also highlight the importance for policymakers and regulators to consider the role of financial reporting complexity when designing sustainability reporting guidelines.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48334,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management","volume":"32 5","pages":"5760-5778"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/csr.70000","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of accounting reporting complexity on the quality of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosures, examining both the individual components of ESG reporting and the overall ESG score. Using a sample of 5146 firm-year observations from U.S.-based companies between 2012 and 2021, the study finds a significant negative impact of accounting reporting complexity on both environmental and overall ESG disclosures. This suggests that firms with complex financial reporting structures may be more likely to limit their sustainability-related disclosures, whether due to resource constraints, managerial discretion, or the difficulty of integrating ESG data within an already intricate reporting framework. The study also finds a weaker and only marginally significant negative effect of accounting complexity on social and governance disclosures, indicating that these dimensions may be less susceptible to the challenges posed by complex financial reporting. The findings are analyzed through the combined lenses of agency theory and information manipulation theory (IMT). Complex financial reporting frameworks create conditions conducive to the selective presentation of ESG information, as shareholders and other stakeholders often lack the capacity to verify every data point. From an agency theory standpoint, managers already possess deeper knowledge of firm operations, and intricate accounting systems further expand their discretion in deciding which details to highlight or suppress, limiting outsiders' ability to evaluate true sustainability performance. Meanwhile, information manipulation theory emphasizes how such complexity enables managers to shape disclosures in ways that amplify favorable outcomes while obscuring less impressive results. Consequently, reporting complexity heightens information asymmetry and increases monitoring costs, complicating the disclosure of critical ESG-related data and diminishing the transparency and credibility of sustainability reporting. The practical implications underscore the need for firms to address the transparency challenges posed by complex reporting structures by adopting standardized ESG reporting frameworks that ensure greater comparability and clarity. These findings also highlight the importance for policymakers and regulators to consider the role of financial reporting complexity when designing sustainability reporting guidelines.

探讨会计报告复杂性对ESG披露的影响
本研究考察了会计报告复杂性对环境、社会和治理(ESG)披露质量的影响,考察了ESG报告的各个组成部分和总体ESG得分。通过对2012年至2021年间5146家美国公司的年度观察样本进行分析,该研究发现,会计报告复杂性对环境和整体ESG披露都产生了显著的负面影响。这表明,具有复杂财务报告结构的公司可能更有可能限制其与可持续性相关的披露,无论是由于资源限制,管理自由裁量权,还是难以将ESG数据整合到已经复杂的报告框架中。研究还发现,会计复杂性对社会和治理披露的负面影响较弱,且仅略微显著,这表明这些方面可能不太容易受到复杂财务报告带来的挑战的影响。本文结合代理理论和信息操纵理论对研究结果进行了分析。复杂的财务报告框架创造了有利于选择性呈现ESG信息的条件,因为股东和其他利益相关者往往缺乏核实每个数据点的能力。从代理理论的角度来看,管理者已经对公司运营有了更深入的了解,而复杂的会计系统进一步扩大了他们在决定突出或压制哪些细节方面的自由裁量权,限制了外部人士评估真正可持续发展绩效的能力。与此同时,信息操纵理论强调,这种复杂性如何使管理者能够以放大有利结果的方式塑造信息披露,同时掩盖不那么令人印象深刻的结果。因此,报告的复杂性加剧了信息不对称,增加了监测成本,使关键esg相关数据的披露复杂化,降低了可持续发展报告的透明度和可信度。实际影响强调了企业需要通过采用标准化的ESG报告框架来解决复杂报告结构带来的透明度挑战,以确保更大的可比性和清晰度。这些发现还强调了决策者和监管者在设计可持续发展报告指南时考虑财务报告复杂性的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.20
自引率
16.30%
发文量
189
期刊介绍: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management is a journal that publishes both theoretical and practical contributions related to the social and environmental responsibilities of businesses in the context of sustainable development. It covers a wide range of topics, including tools and practices associated with these responsibilities, case studies, and cross-country surveys of best practices. The journal aims to help organizations improve their performance and accountability in these areas. The main focus of the journal is on research and practical advice for the development and assessment of social responsibility and environmental tools. It also features practical case studies and evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of different approaches to sustainability. The journal encourages the discussion and debate of sustainability issues and closely monitors the demands of various stakeholder groups. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management is a refereed journal, meaning that all contributions undergo a rigorous review process. It seeks high-quality contributions that appeal to a diverse audience from various disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信