The Dimensions and Evaluation of Audit Firms' Social Responsibility: An Analysis of 40 Audit Firms in China

IF 9.1 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Rongbing Huang, Yuxue Zhang
{"title":"The Dimensions and Evaluation of Audit Firms' Social Responsibility: An Analysis of 40 Audit Firms in China","authors":"Rongbing Huang,&nbsp;Yuxue Zhang","doi":"10.1002/csr.70043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Audit firms' development relies heavily on their stakeholders' trust, and responsible business practices are crucial for their sustainable growth. The aim of this article is to analyze the dimensions of corporate social responsibility (CSR) within audit firms and to evaluate their performance in fulfilling CSR. This article takes 40 original securities-qualified audit firms in China from 2013 to 2022 as the sample. Using stakeholder theory, it establishes a CSR evaluation framework covering four dimensions: employees, clients, the government and industry, the environment, and philanthropy. This study applies an integrated evaluation model based on cyclic correction to evaluate these firms' performance in fulfilling CSR. The results show, first, that the CSR performance of audit firms tends to increase, but the overall level remains low; second, employee responsibility outperforms environmental and philanthropic responsibility, reflecting the unbalanced CSR fulfillment characteristics of audit firms; and third, the Big Four audit firms outperform local firms in CSR performance, highlighting the critical roles of the institutional environment and size of the organization in shaping CSR fulfillment. Overall, the level of CSR performance in audit firms is at an early stage, requiring increased regulation and guidance. This article recommends formulating unified CSR guidelines and strengthening policy support and training for audit firms to promote balanced development of CSR within the industry.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48334,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management","volume":"32 5","pages":"6528-6545"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/csr.70043","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Audit firms' development relies heavily on their stakeholders' trust, and responsible business practices are crucial for their sustainable growth. The aim of this article is to analyze the dimensions of corporate social responsibility (CSR) within audit firms and to evaluate their performance in fulfilling CSR. This article takes 40 original securities-qualified audit firms in China from 2013 to 2022 as the sample. Using stakeholder theory, it establishes a CSR evaluation framework covering four dimensions: employees, clients, the government and industry, the environment, and philanthropy. This study applies an integrated evaluation model based on cyclic correction to evaluate these firms' performance in fulfilling CSR. The results show, first, that the CSR performance of audit firms tends to increase, but the overall level remains low; second, employee responsibility outperforms environmental and philanthropic responsibility, reflecting the unbalanced CSR fulfillment characteristics of audit firms; and third, the Big Four audit firms outperform local firms in CSR performance, highlighting the critical roles of the institutional environment and size of the organization in shaping CSR fulfillment. Overall, the level of CSR performance in audit firms is at an early stage, requiring increased regulation and guidance. This article recommends formulating unified CSR guidelines and strengthening policy support and training for audit firms to promote balanced development of CSR within the industry.

审计事务所社会责任的维度与评价——基于中国40家审计事务所的分析
审计事务所的发展在很大程度上依赖于其利益相关者的信任,负责任的商业行为对其可持续发展至关重要。本文的目的是分析审计事务所的企业社会责任(CSR)的维度,并评估其履行社会责任的绩效。本文以2013 - 2022年中国40家原证券合格审计事务所为样本。运用利益相关者理论,构建了企业社会责任评价框架,涵盖员工、客户、政府与行业、环境、慈善四个维度。本研究采用基于循环修正的综合评价模型对企业履行社会责任的绩效进行评价。结果表明:第一,审计事务所的社会责任绩效有提高的趋势,但总体水平仍然较低;第二,员工责任优于环境责任和慈善责任,反映了审计事务所履行社会责任的不平衡特征;第三,四大审计事务所在企业社会责任绩效方面优于本土审计事务所,这突出了制度环境和组织规模在塑造企业社会责任履行方面的关键作用。总体而言,审计事务所的社会责任绩效水平处于初级阶段,需要加强监管和指导。建议制定统一的企业社会责任指导方针,加强对审计事务所的政策支持和培训,促进企业社会责任在行业内的均衡发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.20
自引率
16.30%
发文量
189
期刊介绍: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management is a journal that publishes both theoretical and practical contributions related to the social and environmental responsibilities of businesses in the context of sustainable development. It covers a wide range of topics, including tools and practices associated with these responsibilities, case studies, and cross-country surveys of best practices. The journal aims to help organizations improve their performance and accountability in these areas. The main focus of the journal is on research and practical advice for the development and assessment of social responsibility and environmental tools. It also features practical case studies and evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of different approaches to sustainability. The journal encourages the discussion and debate of sustainability issues and closely monitors the demands of various stakeholder groups. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management is a refereed journal, meaning that all contributions undergo a rigorous review process. It seeks high-quality contributions that appeal to a diverse audience from various disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信