{"title":"The propositional meaning of metaphor: A critical review against the Davidsonian approach","authors":"Shunkai Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.langcom.2025.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The non-cognitive content account by Donald Davidson ascribes metaphor to the domain of use and asserts that metaphors only have literal meanings. We argue that the Davidsonian approach cannot elucidate the way information is conveyed. Davidson and his supporters’ arguments fail to capture the nature of similes and dead metaphors. From their perspective, metaphor understanding is attributed merely to its aesthetic aspect. We contend that metaphors can not only evoke experience but also communicate knowledge. We address the deficiency of the Davidsonian account through dead metaphor, simile and aesthetic properties. Structure mapping theory and research on embodiment can provide novel insights into the meaning-construction underlying metaphor comprehension. Emphasizing the cognitive account, we posit a paradigm of proposition construction procedure underpinning metaphor comprehension.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47575,"journal":{"name":"Language & Communication","volume":"105 ","pages":"Pages 1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language & Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0271530925000734","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The non-cognitive content account by Donald Davidson ascribes metaphor to the domain of use and asserts that metaphors only have literal meanings. We argue that the Davidsonian approach cannot elucidate the way information is conveyed. Davidson and his supporters’ arguments fail to capture the nature of similes and dead metaphors. From their perspective, metaphor understanding is attributed merely to its aesthetic aspect. We contend that metaphors can not only evoke experience but also communicate knowledge. We address the deficiency of the Davidsonian account through dead metaphor, simile and aesthetic properties. Structure mapping theory and research on embodiment can provide novel insights into the meaning-construction underlying metaphor comprehension. Emphasizing the cognitive account, we posit a paradigm of proposition construction procedure underpinning metaphor comprehension.
期刊介绍:
This journal is unique in that it provides a forum devoted to the interdisciplinary study of language and communication. The investigation of language and its communicational functions is treated as a concern shared in common by those working in applied linguistics, child development, cultural studies, discourse analysis, intellectual history, legal studies, language evolution, linguistic anthropology, linguistics, philosophy, the politics of language, pragmatics, psychology, rhetoric, semiotics, and sociolinguistics. The journal invites contributions which explore the implications of current research for establishing common theoretical frameworks within which findings from different areas of study may be accommodated and interrelated. By focusing attention on the many ways in which language is integrated with other forms of communicational activity and interactional behaviour, it is intended to encourage approaches to the study of language and communication which are not restricted by existing disciplinary boundaries.