The propositional meaning of metaphor: A critical review against the Davidsonian approach

IF 1.4 2区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION
Shunkai Wang
{"title":"The propositional meaning of metaphor: A critical review against the Davidsonian approach","authors":"Shunkai Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.langcom.2025.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The non-cognitive content account by Donald Davidson ascribes metaphor to the domain of use and asserts that metaphors only have literal meanings. We argue that the Davidsonian approach cannot elucidate the way information is conveyed. Davidson and his supporters’ arguments fail to capture the nature of similes and dead metaphors. From their perspective, metaphor understanding is attributed merely to its aesthetic aspect. We contend that metaphors can not only evoke experience but also communicate knowledge. We address the deficiency of the Davidsonian account through dead metaphor, simile and aesthetic properties. Structure mapping theory and research on embodiment can provide novel insights into the meaning-construction underlying metaphor comprehension. Emphasizing the cognitive account, we posit a paradigm of proposition construction procedure underpinning metaphor comprehension.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47575,"journal":{"name":"Language & Communication","volume":"105 ","pages":"Pages 1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language & Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0271530925000734","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The non-cognitive content account by Donald Davidson ascribes metaphor to the domain of use and asserts that metaphors only have literal meanings. We argue that the Davidsonian approach cannot elucidate the way information is conveyed. Davidson and his supporters’ arguments fail to capture the nature of similes and dead metaphors. From their perspective, metaphor understanding is attributed merely to its aesthetic aspect. We contend that metaphors can not only evoke experience but also communicate knowledge. We address the deficiency of the Davidsonian account through dead metaphor, simile and aesthetic properties. Structure mapping theory and research on embodiment can provide novel insights into the meaning-construction underlying metaphor comprehension. Emphasizing the cognitive account, we posit a paradigm of proposition construction procedure underpinning metaphor comprehension.
隐喻的命题意义:对戴维森方法的批判回顾
唐纳德·戴维森的非认知内容说将隐喻归于使用领域,认为隐喻只有字面意义。我们认为,戴维森的方法不能阐明信息传递的方式。戴维森及其支持者的论点未能抓住明喻和死隐喻的本质。在他们看来,对隐喻的理解仅仅是美学层面的。我们认为隐喻不仅可以唤起经验,而且可以传达知识。我们通过死亡的隐喻,明喻和美学特性来解决戴维森叙述的不足。结构映射理论和体现理论的研究为隐喻理解背后的意义建构提供了新的视角。在强调认知解释的基础上,我们假设了一个支撑隐喻理解的命题建构过程范式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: This journal is unique in that it provides a forum devoted to the interdisciplinary study of language and communication. The investigation of language and its communicational functions is treated as a concern shared in common by those working in applied linguistics, child development, cultural studies, discourse analysis, intellectual history, legal studies, language evolution, linguistic anthropology, linguistics, philosophy, the politics of language, pragmatics, psychology, rhetoric, semiotics, and sociolinguistics. The journal invites contributions which explore the implications of current research for establishing common theoretical frameworks within which findings from different areas of study may be accommodated and interrelated. By focusing attention on the many ways in which language is integrated with other forms of communicational activity and interactional behaviour, it is intended to encourage approaches to the study of language and communication which are not restricted by existing disciplinary boundaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信