A comparative policy approach to climate change in cross-border regions

IF 2.1 Q2 GEOGRAPHY
Francesco Cappellano , Joanna Kurowska-Pysz , Andrzej Jakubowski
{"title":"A comparative policy approach to climate change in cross-border regions","authors":"Francesco Cappellano ,&nbsp;Joanna Kurowska-Pysz ,&nbsp;Andrzej Jakubowski","doi":"10.1016/j.rspp.2025.100241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research aims to explore regional place-based approaches to climate change in cross-border regions (CBR)s. CBRs face unique challenges as well as opportunities to develop innovative approaches and more resilient responses to the threats generated by climate change (CC). The study reveals the policy directionality in CBRs across multiple levels of government. Specifically, we explore how the different policy objectives – climate mitigation vs adaptation – are aligned across the international borders in Polish CBRs and their counterparts in Germany, Czechia, Slovakia, and Lithuania. The paper uses mixed methods combining qualitative data concerning both policy documents and investment figures issued at regional, national, and cross-border policy levels. The findings demonstrate the spatial sensitivity in approaches to CC across CBRs. Different levels of policy alignment are reported against the institutional set-ups of the CBRs. The analysis shows a clear consensus on the role of cross-border cooperation in addressing CC-related threats, including floods and forest fires. These threats are recognised unanimously across the CBRs’ sample, although the remediation measures vary. The analysis demonstrates that a similar institutional set-up, across the two sides of the border, “<em>per se</em>” does not necessarily guarantee a coherent approach toward CC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45520,"journal":{"name":"Regional Science Policy and Practice","volume":"17 12","pages":"Article 100241"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Science Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175778022500071X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aims to explore regional place-based approaches to climate change in cross-border regions (CBR)s. CBRs face unique challenges as well as opportunities to develop innovative approaches and more resilient responses to the threats generated by climate change (CC). The study reveals the policy directionality in CBRs across multiple levels of government. Specifically, we explore how the different policy objectives – climate mitigation vs adaptation – are aligned across the international borders in Polish CBRs and their counterparts in Germany, Czechia, Slovakia, and Lithuania. The paper uses mixed methods combining qualitative data concerning both policy documents and investment figures issued at regional, national, and cross-border policy levels. The findings demonstrate the spatial sensitivity in approaches to CC across CBRs. Different levels of policy alignment are reported against the institutional set-ups of the CBRs. The analysis shows a clear consensus on the role of cross-border cooperation in addressing CC-related threats, including floods and forest fires. These threats are recognised unanimously across the CBRs’ sample, although the remediation measures vary. The analysis demonstrates that a similar institutional set-up, across the two sides of the border, “per se” does not necessarily guarantee a coherent approach toward CC.
跨境地区气候变化的比较政策方法
本研究旨在探索基于地域的跨界区域气候变化研究方法。cbr面临着独特的挑战,同时也面临着发展创新方法和更有弹性应对气候变化威胁的机遇。该研究揭示了各级政府在cbr方面的政策方向性。具体而言,我们探讨了不同的政策目标——减缓气候变化vs适应气候变化——如何在波兰的cbr及其在德国、捷克、斯洛伐克和立陶宛的同行中跨越国际边界进行协调。本文采用混合方法,结合定性数据,涉及政策文件和区域、国家和跨境政策层面发布的投资数据。研究结果表明,跨cbr的CC方法具有空间敏感性。根据cbr的机构设置,报告了不同程度的政策一致性。分析表明,对于跨境合作在应对与气候变化有关的威胁(包括洪水和森林火灾)方面的作用,各方达成了明确的共识。这些威胁在cbr的样本中得到了一致认可,尽管补救措施各不相同。分析表明,在边界两侧,类似的制度设置“本身”并不一定保证对共同承担责任采取一致的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
92
期刊介绍: Regional Science Policy & Practice (RSPP) is the official policy and practitioner orientated journal of the Regional Science Association International. It is an international journal that publishes high quality papers in applied regional science that explore policy and practice issues in regional and local development. It welcomes papers from a range of academic disciplines and practitioners including planning, public policy, geography, economics and environmental science and related fields. Papers should address the interface between academic debates and policy development and application. RSPP provides an opportunity for academics and policy makers to develop a dialogue to identify and explore many of the challenges facing local and regional economies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信