Understanding and experimental analysis of soil disturbance by tillage tools with different outer contours

IF 6.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Kuan Qin , Wei Wang , Chunsong Guan , Weidong Gao , Ding Zhang , Chengmao Cao , Junjie Lu , Xu Zhu , Jun Ge
{"title":"Understanding and experimental analysis of soil disturbance by tillage tools with different outer contours","authors":"Kuan Qin ,&nbsp;Wei Wang ,&nbsp;Chunsong Guan ,&nbsp;Weidong Gao ,&nbsp;Ding Zhang ,&nbsp;Chengmao Cao ,&nbsp;Junjie Lu ,&nbsp;Xu Zhu ,&nbsp;Jun Ge","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2025.106835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To investigate the soil dynamics affected by the tillage tools with different lateral outer contours, three distinct contour profiles were designed, and a soil bin experiment was conducted. The contour profiles of the tools included a straight line, a concave brachistochrone, and a convex brachistochrone. The experimental conditions involved two soil types (sandy soil and clay soil) with moisture content ranging from 10 % to 30 %, and tool operating speeds varying from 0.03 to 0.15 m/s in increments of 0.03 m/s. In this study, Digital Particle Image Velocimetry (DPIV) was employed to measure soil disturbance caused by the tools, focusing on the fine movement of soil particles, a phenomenon often overlooked in previous studies. The final state of soil movement was categorized into two distinct areas: a covered area and an uncovered area. The experimental results indicated that the covered area predominantly determined the variation in disturbed soil when changes were made to the soil moisture content and tool velocity. In contrast, the uncovered area was largely unaffected by variations in soil moisture content or tool movement. Additionally, the interaction force between the soil and tool was investigated, revealing that it was more sensitive in clay soil compared to sandy soil.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49503,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Tillage Research","volume":"256 ","pages":"Article 106835"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198725003897","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To investigate the soil dynamics affected by the tillage tools with different lateral outer contours, three distinct contour profiles were designed, and a soil bin experiment was conducted. The contour profiles of the tools included a straight line, a concave brachistochrone, and a convex brachistochrone. The experimental conditions involved two soil types (sandy soil and clay soil) with moisture content ranging from 10 % to 30 %, and tool operating speeds varying from 0.03 to 0.15 m/s in increments of 0.03 m/s. In this study, Digital Particle Image Velocimetry (DPIV) was employed to measure soil disturbance caused by the tools, focusing on the fine movement of soil particles, a phenomenon often overlooked in previous studies. The final state of soil movement was categorized into two distinct areas: a covered area and an uncovered area. The experimental results indicated that the covered area predominantly determined the variation in disturbed soil when changes were made to the soil moisture content and tool velocity. In contrast, the uncovered area was largely unaffected by variations in soil moisture content or tool movement. Additionally, the interaction force between the soil and tool was investigated, revealing that it was more sensitive in clay soil compared to sandy soil.
不同外轮廓耕具对土壤扰动的认识与实验分析
为研究不同外侧外轮廓耕具对土壤动力学的影响,设计了3种不同外侧外轮廓耕具,并进行了土仓试验。刀具的轮廓轮廓包括一条直线、一条凹的腕骨时线和一条凸的腕骨时线。试验条件涉及两种土壤类型(沙土和粘土),含水量为10 % ~ 30 %,工具运行速度为0.03 ~ 0.15 m/s,增量为0.03 m/s。本研究采用数字粒子图像测速技术(Digital Particle Image velocity, DPIV)测量工具引起的土壤扰动,重点关注土壤颗粒的细微运动,这是以往研究中经常忽视的现象。土壤运动的最终状态被分为两个不同的区域:覆盖区域和未覆盖区域。试验结果表明,当土壤含水率和刀具速度发生变化时,被扰动土壤的变化主要由被扰动面积决定。相比之下,未覆盖的区域在很大程度上不受土壤含水量变化或工具运动的影响。此外,研究了土壤与工具之间的相互作用力,发现粘土比沙土对土壤与工具之间的相互作用力更敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil & Tillage Research
Soil & Tillage Research 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Soil & Tillage Research examines the physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic. Manuscripts will be considered on aspects of soil science, physics, technology, mechanization and applied engineering for a sustainable balance among productivity, environmental quality and profitability. The following are examples of suitable topics within the scope of the journal of Soil and Tillage Research: The agricultural and biosystems engineering associated with tillage (including no-tillage, reduced-tillage and direct drilling), irrigation and drainage, crops and crop rotations, fertilization, rehabilitation of mine spoils and processes used to modify soils. Soil change effects on establishment and yield of crops, growth of plants and roots, structure and erosion of soil, cycling of carbon and nutrients, greenhouse gas emissions, leaching, runoff and other processes that affect environmental quality. Characterization or modeling of tillage and field traffic responses, soil, climate, or topographic effects, soil deformation processes, tillage tools, traction devices, energy requirements, economics, surface and subsurface water quality effects, tillage effects on weed, pest and disease control, and their interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信