New evidence on the determinants of agri-food GHG emissions in low and middle-income countries

IF 11.2 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Bartlomiej Rokicki , Tasfaye Fayisa
{"title":"New evidence on the determinants of agri-food GHG emissions in low and middle-income countries","authors":"Bartlomiej Rokicki ,&nbsp;Tasfaye Fayisa","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study applies newly compiled FAO data to investigate the drivers of GHG emissions from the agri-food sector in 106 low- and middle-income countries over the 1993–2021 period. However, unlike the majority of previous studies, it investigates possible differences across different GHG, income levels, and continents using advanced econometric tools. The results for the full sample suggest that all potential explanatory variables except trade are positively correlated with agri-food GHG emissions. Nevertheless, there exist significant differences between continents and groups of countries with different income levels. For instance, population emerges as a significant determinant of agri-food emissions in Asia and Europe. The Gross Value of agricultural production per capita shows a consistent and significant positive effect on emissions in all specifications for Asia, while for other continents, its elasticity is lower and lacks statistical significance in some specifications. Furthermore, fertilizer intensity and livestock size are a strong driver of GHG emissions across all continents. Finally, the results of additional analyses show that there are substantial differences in the determinants of particular GHG types. Specifically, population and livestock size have a positive and statistically significant impact on both CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions across all specifications. However, in the fixed-effects specifications, these variables have no significant impact on CO<sub>2</sub>. On the other hand, the ratio of forestland to total land has a positive and significant impact on CO<sub>2</sub> while the relationship with CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O is less clear. Consequently, this study provides a detailed picture of the determinants of emissions that could be used to tailor more efficient mitigation policies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"117 ","pages":"Article 108155"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019592552500352X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study applies newly compiled FAO data to investigate the drivers of GHG emissions from the agri-food sector in 106 low- and middle-income countries over the 1993–2021 period. However, unlike the majority of previous studies, it investigates possible differences across different GHG, income levels, and continents using advanced econometric tools. The results for the full sample suggest that all potential explanatory variables except trade are positively correlated with agri-food GHG emissions. Nevertheless, there exist significant differences between continents and groups of countries with different income levels. For instance, population emerges as a significant determinant of agri-food emissions in Asia and Europe. The Gross Value of agricultural production per capita shows a consistent and significant positive effect on emissions in all specifications for Asia, while for other continents, its elasticity is lower and lacks statistical significance in some specifications. Furthermore, fertilizer intensity and livestock size are a strong driver of GHG emissions across all continents. Finally, the results of additional analyses show that there are substantial differences in the determinants of particular GHG types. Specifically, population and livestock size have a positive and statistically significant impact on both CH4 and N2O emissions across all specifications. However, in the fixed-effects specifications, these variables have no significant impact on CO2. On the other hand, the ratio of forestland to total land has a positive and significant impact on CO2 while the relationship with CH4 and N2O is less clear. Consequently, this study provides a detailed picture of the determinants of emissions that could be used to tailor more efficient mitigation policies.
关于中低收入国家农业食品温室气体排放决定因素的新证据
本研究采用粮农组织新编制的数据,调查了1993年至2021年期间106个低收入和中等收入国家农业食品部门温室气体排放的驱动因素。然而,与之前的大多数研究不同,它使用先进的计量经济工具调查了不同温室气体、收入水平和大陆之间可能存在的差异。整个样本的结果表明,除贸易外,所有潜在的解释变量都与农业食品温室气体排放呈正相关。然而,不同收入水平的大陆和国家集团之间存在显著差异。例如,在亚洲和欧洲,人口成为农业食品排放的一个重要决定因素。在亚洲,人均农业生产总值对排放的正向影响一致且显著,而在其他大洲,其弹性较低,在某些指标上缺乏统计显著性。此外,施肥强度和牲畜规模是各大洲温室气体排放的重要驱动因素。最后,附加分析的结果表明,特定温室气体类型的决定因素存在实质性差异。具体而言,在所有指标中,人口和牲畜规模对CH4和N2O排放均具有统计学上显著的正影响。而在固定效应规范中,这些变量对CO2的影响不显著。另一方面,林地占土地总面积的比例对CO2有显著的正向影响,而与CH4和N2O的关系不太清楚。因此,本研究提供了可用于制定更有效的减缓政策的排放决定因素的详细情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信