Modeling and simulation of neutron-gamma density logging: Impact of mudcake thickness and barite content on measurement accuracy

IF 2.6 3区 工程技术 Q1 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Abolfazl Rafizade, Seyed Abolfazl Hosseini
{"title":"Modeling and simulation of neutron-gamma density logging: Impact of mudcake thickness and barite content on measurement accuracy","authors":"Abolfazl Rafizade,&nbsp;Seyed Abolfazl Hosseini","doi":"10.1016/j.net.2025.103883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the influence of mudcake thickness and barite weight fraction on Neutron-Gamma Density (NGD) logging measurements, applying both NGD-FC and NGD-TC methods to simulate the interactions of fast neutrons and gamma rays in a wellbore environment. Initially, based on fast neutron and gamma diffusion theory and incorporating the build-up factor, a mathematical model of the well logging tool was constructed. To validate this model and enable more detailed analysis, simulations were conducted using the MCNP code, which provided the response of the tool under varying conditions. Simulated responses were then compared with theoretical predictions to ensure model accuracy.</div><div>The research examines mudcake conditions with thicknesses ranging from 3 to 12 mm and barite weight fractions of 10 %–30 %, highlighting that NGD-TC is particularly sensitive to mudcake thickness, as evidenced by a Max Error increasing from 22.36 % to 44.07 %. Conversely, NGD-FC maintains lower and more stable errors (15.91–19.58) under similar conditions, though it shows higher sensitivity to barite content due to fast neutron scattering influences.</div><div>Overall, this study emphasizes the importance of selecting the appropriate NGD method to ensure reliable measurements in complex wellbore environments. By fine-tuning calibration coefficients and understanding the interaction mechanisms that influence neutron and gamma flux, the research enhances the accuracy of NGD logging, thereby supporting improved decision-making in resource extraction and subsurface evaluations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19272,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Engineering and Technology","volume":"58 1","pages":"Article 103883"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573325004516","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of mudcake thickness and barite weight fraction on Neutron-Gamma Density (NGD) logging measurements, applying both NGD-FC and NGD-TC methods to simulate the interactions of fast neutrons and gamma rays in a wellbore environment. Initially, based on fast neutron and gamma diffusion theory and incorporating the build-up factor, a mathematical model of the well logging tool was constructed. To validate this model and enable more detailed analysis, simulations were conducted using the MCNP code, which provided the response of the tool under varying conditions. Simulated responses were then compared with theoretical predictions to ensure model accuracy.
The research examines mudcake conditions with thicknesses ranging from 3 to 12 mm and barite weight fractions of 10 %–30 %, highlighting that NGD-TC is particularly sensitive to mudcake thickness, as evidenced by a Max Error increasing from 22.36 % to 44.07 %. Conversely, NGD-FC maintains lower and more stable errors (15.91–19.58) under similar conditions, though it shows higher sensitivity to barite content due to fast neutron scattering influences.
Overall, this study emphasizes the importance of selecting the appropriate NGD method to ensure reliable measurements in complex wellbore environments. By fine-tuning calibration coefficients and understanding the interaction mechanisms that influence neutron and gamma flux, the research enhances the accuracy of NGD logging, thereby supporting improved decision-making in resource extraction and subsurface evaluations.
中子-伽马密度测井建模与模拟:泥饼厚度和重晶石含量对测量精度的影响
本研究研究了泥饼厚度和重晶石重量分数对中子-伽马密度(NGD)测井测量的影响,应用NGD- fc和NGD- tc方法模拟了井筒环境中快中子和伽马射线的相互作用。首先,基于快中子和伽马扩散理论,并考虑累积因素,建立了测井工具的数学模型。为了验证该模型并进行更详细的分析,使用MCNP代码进行了模拟,该代码提供了该工具在不同条件下的响应。然后将模拟反应与理论预测进行比较,以确保模型的准确性。该研究考察了泥饼厚度为3 ~ 12mm,重晶石重量分数为10% ~ 30%的条件,强调了NGD-TC对泥饼厚度特别敏感,最大误差从22.36%增加到44.07%。相反,NGD-FC由于快中子散射的影响,对重晶石含量表现出更高的灵敏度,但在类似的条件下保持了更低更稳定的误差(15.91-19.58)。总的来说,该研究强调了选择合适的NGD方法的重要性,以确保在复杂的井筒环境中进行可靠的测量。通过微调校准系数,了解影响中子和伽马通量的相互作用机制,提高了NGD测井的准确性,从而为资源开采和地下评价的决策提供了支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nuclear Engineering and Technology
Nuclear Engineering and Technology 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
431
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Nuclear Engineering and Technology (NET), an international journal of the Korean Nuclear Society (KNS), publishes peer-reviewed papers on original research, ideas and developments in all areas of the field of nuclear science and technology. NET bimonthly publishes original articles, reviews, and technical notes. The journal is listed in the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) of Thomson Reuters. NET covers all fields for peaceful utilization of nuclear energy and radiation as follows: 1) Reactor Physics 2) Thermal Hydraulics 3) Nuclear Safety 4) Nuclear I&C 5) Nuclear Physics, Fusion, and Laser Technology 6) Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Radioactive Waste Management 7) Nuclear Fuel and Reactor Materials 8) Radiation Application 9) Radiation Protection 10) Nuclear Structural Analysis and Plant Management & Maintenance 11) Nuclear Policy, Economics, and Human Resource Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信