Assessing the influence of three policies on Vietnam's economic development: Electricity infrastructure, globalization, and privatization

Gerard Sasges , Harutaka Takahashi
{"title":"Assessing the influence of three policies on Vietnam's economic development: Electricity infrastructure, globalization, and privatization","authors":"Gerard Sasges ,&nbsp;Harutaka Takahashi","doi":"10.1016/j.inteco.2025.100632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study evaluates the contributions of three key policies—electricity infrastructure, globalization, and privatization—to Vietnam's economic development from 1980 to 2018. This period can be divided into two distinct phases: Period I (1980–1997) was characterized by high but unstable growth, while Period II (1998–2018) witnessed sustained high growth and improved stability. To assess the impact of these policies on GDP growth during both phases, impulse response and vector autoregression (VAR) analyses were conducted. Our results show that during Period I, globalization and energy infrastructure had immediate and substantial positive impacts on GDP growth but also contributed to growth rate instability. In Period II, power infrastructure and globalization continued to support GDP growth, though the effects were relatively minor. In contrast, privatization policies had a significant impact. They contributed to stable household consumption growth and enhanced the resilience of GDP growth to policy shocks, thus playing a key role in achieving the stable and high growth trajectory observed since 1998. While Vietnam's development path may appear unique from the standpoint of existing development theories, optimal growth theory offers a more suitable explanatory framework.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13794,"journal":{"name":"International Economics","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 100632"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2110701725000551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluates the contributions of three key policies—electricity infrastructure, globalization, and privatization—to Vietnam's economic development from 1980 to 2018. This period can be divided into two distinct phases: Period I (1980–1997) was characterized by high but unstable growth, while Period II (1998–2018) witnessed sustained high growth and improved stability. To assess the impact of these policies on GDP growth during both phases, impulse response and vector autoregression (VAR) analyses were conducted. Our results show that during Period I, globalization and energy infrastructure had immediate and substantial positive impacts on GDP growth but also contributed to growth rate instability. In Period II, power infrastructure and globalization continued to support GDP growth, though the effects were relatively minor. In contrast, privatization policies had a significant impact. They contributed to stable household consumption growth and enhanced the resilience of GDP growth to policy shocks, thus playing a key role in achieving the stable and high growth trajectory observed since 1998. While Vietnam's development path may appear unique from the standpoint of existing development theories, optimal growth theory offers a more suitable explanatory framework.
评估三个政策对越南经济发展的影响:电力基础设施、全球化和私有化
本研究评估了三个关键政策——电力基础设施、全球化和私有化——对1980年至2018年越南经济发展的贡献。这一时期可以分为两个不同的阶段:第一阶段(1980-1997)的特点是高速但不稳定的增长,而第二阶段(1998-2018)则是持续的高速增长和稳定的改善。为了评估这些政策在这两个阶段对GDP增长的影响,我们进行了脉冲响应和向量自回归(VAR)分析。我们的研究结果表明,在第一时期,全球化和能源基础设施对GDP增长产生了直接而实质性的积极影响,但也导致了增长率的不稳定性。在第二阶段,电力基础设施和全球化继续支持GDP增长,尽管影响相对较小。相比之下,私有化政策产生了重大影响。它们促进了居民消费的稳定增长,增强了GDP增长对政策冲击的抵御能力,从而在实现1998年以来的稳定高增长轨道方面发挥了关键作用。虽然从现有发展理论的角度来看,越南的发展道路似乎是独一无二的,但最优增长理论提供了一个更合适的解释框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Economics
International Economics Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
71 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信