Stability analysis of human hand grasping for the design of pneumatic muscle-driven end effector targeting citrus picking

IF 8.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Lina Wang , Peigen Xu , Jinbo Li , Surkova Ekaterina , Binrui Wang
{"title":"Stability analysis of human hand grasping for the design of pneumatic muscle-driven end effector targeting citrus picking","authors":"Lina Wang ,&nbsp;Peigen Xu ,&nbsp;Jinbo Li ,&nbsp;Surkova Ekaterina ,&nbsp;Binrui Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.compag.2025.110942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The integration of fruit-picking robots with anthropomorphic hand technology represents a significant advancement in agricultural automation and intelligence. The end effector is a key component for citrus harvesting robots. This paper proposes a new method to analyze and evaluate the stability of human hand grasping of citrus to guide the design of end effectors. A comprehensive assessment of 33 common human hand grasping postures was conducted, summarizing the 4 most commonly used human hand grasping types in citrus picking. Pressure data acquisition gloves were employed to obtain grasping force data from 16 regions, Principal Component Analysis algorithm was utilized to evaluate the functionality of each finger region, and wavelet transform algorithm was applied to assess the stability of the 4 grasping types. A pneumatic muscle-driven end effector for citrus picking was designed. The experimental results indicate that the grasping stability varies among different types. The stability ranking from high to low is as follows: Power palm-Thumb abduction type, Pinch type, Power pad-Thumb abduction type, and Power palm-Thumb adduction type. The stability of grasping direction from bottom to top is higher than that of side. The grasping performance test results show that the pneumatic muscle-driven end effector can stably grasp citrus fruits, with an average grasping time of 1.31 s and a grasping success rate of 100%. This study provides strong support for the design of end effectors for citrus picking robots.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50627,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture","volume":"239 ","pages":"Article 110942"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168169925010488","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The integration of fruit-picking robots with anthropomorphic hand technology represents a significant advancement in agricultural automation and intelligence. The end effector is a key component for citrus harvesting robots. This paper proposes a new method to analyze and evaluate the stability of human hand grasping of citrus to guide the design of end effectors. A comprehensive assessment of 33 common human hand grasping postures was conducted, summarizing the 4 most commonly used human hand grasping types in citrus picking. Pressure data acquisition gloves were employed to obtain grasping force data from 16 regions, Principal Component Analysis algorithm was utilized to evaluate the functionality of each finger region, and wavelet transform algorithm was applied to assess the stability of the 4 grasping types. A pneumatic muscle-driven end effector for citrus picking was designed. The experimental results indicate that the grasping stability varies among different types. The stability ranking from high to low is as follows: Power palm-Thumb abduction type, Pinch type, Power pad-Thumb abduction type, and Power palm-Thumb adduction type. The stability of grasping direction from bottom to top is higher than that of side. The grasping performance test results show that the pneumatic muscle-driven end effector can stably grasp citrus fruits, with an average grasping time of 1.31 s and a grasping success rate of 100%. This study provides strong support for the design of end effectors for citrus picking robots.
基于人手抓取稳定性分析的柑橘采摘气动肌肉驱动末端执行器设计
摘果机器人与拟人化手技术的结合代表了农业自动化和智能化的重大进步。末端执行器是柑橘收获机器人的关键部件。本文提出了一种分析评价人手抓取柑橘稳定性的新方法,以指导末端执行器的设计。对33种常见的人手抓取姿势进行了综合评价,总结出柑橘采摘中最常用的4种人手抓取类型。采用压力数据采集手套获取16个区域的抓握力数据,采用主成分分析算法评估各手指区域的功能性,并采用小波变换算法评估4种抓握类型的稳定性。设计了一种用于柑橘采摘的气动肌肉驱动末端执行器。实验结果表明,不同类型的机械手抓取稳定性存在差异。稳定性从高到低依次为:强力掌-拇指外展型、捏型、强力垫-拇指外展型、强力掌-拇指内收型。从下向上抓取方向的稳定性高于侧面抓取方向。抓取性能测试结果表明,气动肌肉驱动末端执行器能够稳定抓取柑橘类水果,平均抓取时间为1.31 s,抓取成功率为100%。该研究为柑橘采摘机器人末端执行器的设计提供了有力的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
15.30
自引率
14.50%
发文量
800
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Computers and Electronics in Agriculture provides international coverage of advancements in computer hardware, software, electronic instrumentation, and control systems applied to agricultural challenges. Encompassing agronomy, horticulture, forestry, aquaculture, and animal farming, the journal publishes original papers, reviews, and applications notes. It explores the use of computers and electronics in plant or animal agricultural production, covering topics like agricultural soils, water, pests, controlled environments, and waste. The scope extends to on-farm post-harvest operations and relevant technologies, including artificial intelligence, sensors, machine vision, robotics, networking, and simulation modeling. Its companion journal, Smart Agricultural Technology, continues the focus on smart applications in production agriculture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信