Advancing metrics for animal welfare and antibiotic use in sustainability assessments of diets

IF 9.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Lotta Rydhmer , Elin Röös
{"title":"Advancing metrics for animal welfare and antibiotic use in sustainability assessments of diets","authors":"Lotta Rydhmer ,&nbsp;Elin Röös","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2025.08.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Assessment of the sustainability of diets typically includes the diet's impact on the environment, including effect on greenhouse gas emissions, and the use of land and water. However, there are other crucial sustainability aspects including animal welfare and antibiotic use that sustainability assessments usually neglect due to methodological challenges and lack of available data. This study contributes to the improvement of sustainability assessments of food systems by advancing methods to include animal welfare and antibiotic use. The proposed animal welfare indices reflect the number of animals affected per kilogram of animal product, the animals' cognitive ability to experience negative effects, and the quality of the production system, including disease frequency and space limitations. The proposed antibiotic use indicator acts as a proxy for the risk of bacteria developing resistance to antibiotics that threatens health of humans and animals. It was developed based on national sales data, adjusted for species-specific differences. The animal welfare indices and the antibiotic use indicator were applied to a range of animal products commonly consumed in a set of European countries, revealing substantial variations in animal welfare loss and antibiotic use across species and production systems. For example, rabbit and chicken production showed high welfare loss per kilogram of meat due to the number of animals affected and the relatively poor conditions in intensive livestock systems. Meat from cattle and wild-caught species had lower welfare loss (<em>i.e.</em> favourable) per kilogram, attributed to the larger body mass of these animals and less suffering in production. The methodologies developed here offer a much needed tool for evaluating trade-offs between animal welfare, antibiotic use, and environmental sustainability in food production.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"59 ","pages":"Pages 288-304"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550925001769","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assessment of the sustainability of diets typically includes the diet's impact on the environment, including effect on greenhouse gas emissions, and the use of land and water. However, there are other crucial sustainability aspects including animal welfare and antibiotic use that sustainability assessments usually neglect due to methodological challenges and lack of available data. This study contributes to the improvement of sustainability assessments of food systems by advancing methods to include animal welfare and antibiotic use. The proposed animal welfare indices reflect the number of animals affected per kilogram of animal product, the animals' cognitive ability to experience negative effects, and the quality of the production system, including disease frequency and space limitations. The proposed antibiotic use indicator acts as a proxy for the risk of bacteria developing resistance to antibiotics that threatens health of humans and animals. It was developed based on national sales data, adjusted for species-specific differences. The animal welfare indices and the antibiotic use indicator were applied to a range of animal products commonly consumed in a set of European countries, revealing substantial variations in animal welfare loss and antibiotic use across species and production systems. For example, rabbit and chicken production showed high welfare loss per kilogram of meat due to the number of animals affected and the relatively poor conditions in intensive livestock systems. Meat from cattle and wild-caught species had lower welfare loss (i.e. favourable) per kilogram, attributed to the larger body mass of these animals and less suffering in production. The methodologies developed here offer a much needed tool for evaluating trade-offs between animal welfare, antibiotic use, and environmental sustainability in food production.
在饮食可持续性评估中推进动物福利和抗生素使用指标
对饮食可持续性的评估通常包括饮食对环境的影响,包括对温室气体排放的影响,以及土地和水的利用。然而,还有其他关键的可持续性方面,包括动物福利和抗生素的使用,可持续性评估通常由于方法上的挑战和缺乏可用数据而被忽视。本研究通过推进包括动物福利和抗生素使用在内的方法,有助于改善粮食系统的可持续性评估。拟议的动物福利指数反映了每公斤动物产品受影响的动物数量,动物对负面影响的认知能力,以及生产系统的质量,包括疾病频率和空间限制。拟议的抗生素使用指标可作为细菌对抗生素产生耐药性的风险指标,从而威胁人类和动物的健康。它是根据国家销售数据制定的,并根据特定物种的差异进行了调整。动物福利指数和抗生素使用指标应用于一系列欧洲国家普遍消费的动物产品,揭示了动物福利损失和抗生素使用在物种和生产系统之间的巨大差异。例如,由于受影响的动物数量和集约化畜牧系统中相对较差的条件,兔肉和鸡肉生产显示出每公斤肉的高福利损失。牛和野生捕获物种的肉每公斤的福利损失(即有利)较低,原因是这些动物的体重较大,生产过程中遭受的痛苦较少。这里开发的方法为评估食品生产中动物福利、抗生素使用和环境可持续性之间的权衡提供了一个急需的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Sustainable Production and Consumption Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
389
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable production and consumption refers to the production and utilization of goods and services in a way that benefits society, is economically viable, and has minimal environmental impact throughout its entire lifespan. Our journal is dedicated to publishing top-notch interdisciplinary research and practical studies in this emerging field. We take a distinctive approach by examining the interplay between technology, consumption patterns, and policy to identify sustainable solutions for both production and consumption systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信