Helen Y. Chu, Holly Janes, Marco Carone, Peter B. Gilbert, Stanley Plotkin
{"title":"Improving the evidence base for COVID-19 vaccines","authors":"Helen Y. Chu, Holly Janes, Marco Carone, Peter B. Gilbert, Stanley Plotkin","doi":"10.1038/s41591-025-03908-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic marked an unprecedented time when safe and effective vaccines were developed, authorized, and approved for use within months of the initial identification of the novel coronavirus<sup>1</sup>. These authorizations and approvals were based on large, placebo-controlled trials powered to characterize safety and efficacy against clinically significant infection — appropriate designs given the use of vaccine platforms, such as mRNA technology, and antigens, including the prefusion spike protein, that had not previously been studied at large scale in humans. These early studies were among the largest clinical trials in recent history, enrolling tens of thousands of participants and providing definitive evidence of the safety and efficacy of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.</p><p>Since then, the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 has prompted annual updates to COVID-19 vaccine composition to match the predominant circulating strain. Multiple national surveillance platforms provide data on the effectiveness of current vaccines to inform the need for updates<sup>5</sup>. As with other seasonal vaccines (for example, influenza), these updates are based on immunobridging studies that compare neutralizing antibody titers induced by vaccines with new variant inserts to those induced by approved vaccines<sup>6</sup>. Licensure by a regulatory body typically requires non-inferiority of the investigational vaccine versus the approved vaccine, meaning that the investigational vaccine is not clinically significantly worse than the approved vaccine (Fig. 1b). For seasonal vaccines, this is appropriate for several reasons. Annual vaccine updates require considerable lead time for production. For influenza, strain selection decisions are typically made 4–6 months in advance at a semiannual meeting convened by the World Health Organization, followed by a meeting of the US Food and Drug Administration’s Vaccine and Related Biologics Advisory Committee, which recommends strains to domestic vaccine manufacturers. To match the vaccine to circulating strains while also giving manufacturers sufficient time to produce the necessary doses for distribution, strain selection recommendations are made using immunobridging studies that show neutralization of new circulating variants. The timeline for COVID-19 vaccine updates might differ based on the evolution of the virus as well as use of mRNA technology, though it still requires lead time for production and distribution. Immunobridging is a well-established approach for seasonal vaccine strain selection and is standard practice in many countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":19037,"journal":{"name":"Nature Medicine","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":50.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03908-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic marked an unprecedented time when safe and effective vaccines were developed, authorized, and approved for use within months of the initial identification of the novel coronavirus1. These authorizations and approvals were based on large, placebo-controlled trials powered to characterize safety and efficacy against clinically significant infection — appropriate designs given the use of vaccine platforms, such as mRNA technology, and antigens, including the prefusion spike protein, that had not previously been studied at large scale in humans. These early studies were among the largest clinical trials in recent history, enrolling tens of thousands of participants and providing definitive evidence of the safety and efficacy of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.
Since then, the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 has prompted annual updates to COVID-19 vaccine composition to match the predominant circulating strain. Multiple national surveillance platforms provide data on the effectiveness of current vaccines to inform the need for updates5. As with other seasonal vaccines (for example, influenza), these updates are based on immunobridging studies that compare neutralizing antibody titers induced by vaccines with new variant inserts to those induced by approved vaccines6. Licensure by a regulatory body typically requires non-inferiority of the investigational vaccine versus the approved vaccine, meaning that the investigational vaccine is not clinically significantly worse than the approved vaccine (Fig. 1b). For seasonal vaccines, this is appropriate for several reasons. Annual vaccine updates require considerable lead time for production. For influenza, strain selection decisions are typically made 4–6 months in advance at a semiannual meeting convened by the World Health Organization, followed by a meeting of the US Food and Drug Administration’s Vaccine and Related Biologics Advisory Committee, which recommends strains to domestic vaccine manufacturers. To match the vaccine to circulating strains while also giving manufacturers sufficient time to produce the necessary doses for distribution, strain selection recommendations are made using immunobridging studies that show neutralization of new circulating variants. The timeline for COVID-19 vaccine updates might differ based on the evolution of the virus as well as use of mRNA technology, though it still requires lead time for production and distribution. Immunobridging is a well-established approach for seasonal vaccine strain selection and is standard practice in many countries.
期刊介绍:
Nature Medicine is a monthly journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all areas of medicine. The publication focuses on originality, timeliness, interdisciplinary interest, and the impact on improving human health. In addition to research articles, Nature Medicine also publishes commissioned content such as News, Reviews, and Perspectives. This content aims to provide context for the latest advances in translational and clinical research, reaching a wide audience of M.D. and Ph.D. readers. All editorial decisions for the journal are made by a team of full-time professional editors.
Nature Medicine consider all types of clinical research, including:
-Case-reports and small case series
-Clinical trials, whether phase 1, 2, 3 or 4
-Observational studies
-Meta-analyses
-Biomarker studies
-Public and global health studies
Nature Medicine is also committed to facilitating communication between translational and clinical researchers. As such, we consider “hybrid” studies with preclinical and translational findings reported alongside data from clinical studies.