{"title":"Artificial intelligence-based approaches for sleep-related breathing events identification using EEG and ECG signals.","authors":"Nguyen Thi Hoang Trang, Tran Thanh Duy Linh, Do Quoc Vu, Bui Thi Hong Loan, Nguyen Nhu Vinh, Tran Ngoc Dang","doi":"10.1007/s11325-025-03442-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purposes: </strong>Sleep apnea or hypopnea is a sleep-related breathing disorder characterized by insufficient ventilation during sleep. Sleep apnea is classified into two major forms: obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and central sleep apnea (CSA). The conventional diagnosis with Polysomnography (PSG) is time-consuming, uncomfortable, and costly in the clinical setting. To address these issues, wearable devices and AI techniques have been developed, utilizing single or multi-modal physiological signals. This study aims to deploy a multi-modal approach by analyzing both EEG and ECG signals derived from home sleep testing devices for OSA/CSA/hypopnea identification. A robust ensemble learning model is proposed to compare with the performance of the deep learning model in event classification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>EEG and ECG signals from 201 PSG were collected. Non-linear features extracted by wavelet transform methods and machine learning were used to develop a classification algorithm. ECG spectrograms and the deep learning model were also deployed to compare with traditional method. Two classification strategies including 3-class (OSA-hypopnea-normal, OSA-CSA-normal) and 2-class (OSA-hypopnea, OSA-CSA) were also examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest classification performance was achieved using the combined signal-based model with 98.8% accuracy, 99.1% sensitivity, and 98.5% specificity for classifying OSA and CSA. When compared with the deep learning model, the classification accuracy of the combined signal-based machine learning model was significantly higher in almost all classification strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings highlight the effectiveness of combining non-linear features from ECG and EEG signals for classifying various sleep-related breathing events. A proposed machine learning model provides significantly precise classification compared to a deep learning approach, offering improved reliability in-home sleep setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":520777,"journal":{"name":"Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung","volume":"29 5","pages":"276"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12402030/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-025-03442-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purposes: Sleep apnea or hypopnea is a sleep-related breathing disorder characterized by insufficient ventilation during sleep. Sleep apnea is classified into two major forms: obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and central sleep apnea (CSA). The conventional diagnosis with Polysomnography (PSG) is time-consuming, uncomfortable, and costly in the clinical setting. To address these issues, wearable devices and AI techniques have been developed, utilizing single or multi-modal physiological signals. This study aims to deploy a multi-modal approach by analyzing both EEG and ECG signals derived from home sleep testing devices for OSA/CSA/hypopnea identification. A robust ensemble learning model is proposed to compare with the performance of the deep learning model in event classification.
Methods: EEG and ECG signals from 201 PSG were collected. Non-linear features extracted by wavelet transform methods and machine learning were used to develop a classification algorithm. ECG spectrograms and the deep learning model were also deployed to compare with traditional method. Two classification strategies including 3-class (OSA-hypopnea-normal, OSA-CSA-normal) and 2-class (OSA-hypopnea, OSA-CSA) were also examined.
Results: The highest classification performance was achieved using the combined signal-based model with 98.8% accuracy, 99.1% sensitivity, and 98.5% specificity for classifying OSA and CSA. When compared with the deep learning model, the classification accuracy of the combined signal-based machine learning model was significantly higher in almost all classification strategies.
Conclusion: The findings highlight the effectiveness of combining non-linear features from ECG and EEG signals for classifying various sleep-related breathing events. A proposed machine learning model provides significantly precise classification compared to a deep learning approach, offering improved reliability in-home sleep setting.