Associations between Gender Discrimination, Resilience and Social Support with Self-Harm and Suicidality among Transgender Women in Brazil.

Sandro Sperandei, Francisco Inácio Bastos, Clara Lyra, Sithum Munasinghe, Andrew Page, Arianne Reis
{"title":"Associations between Gender Discrimination, Resilience and Social Support with Self-Harm and Suicidality among Transgender Women in Brazil.","authors":"Sandro Sperandei, Francisco Inácio Bastos, Clara Lyra, Sithum Munasinghe, Andrew Page, Arianne Reis","doi":"10.47626/1516-4446-2025-4329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transgender individuals experience pervasive discrimination throughout their lives on both structural and interpersonal levels, greatly impacting on suicide risk. Gender-based discrimination can affect up to 96% of transgender individuals in Brazil, the country selected as the focus of this study.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To explore suicidal behaviour among transgender women by investigating the associations between resilience, social support, and experiences of gender discrimination and thoughts of self-harm, suicide ideation and suicide attempt among transgender women in Brazil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study draws from cross-sectional data from the Brazilian DIVAS study. A respondent-driven sampling method was used to recruit 2,470 participants. Fourteen experiences of discrimination were used in a latent class analysis model to separate the sample into classes. A multiple logistic regression model was used to assess the association of each outcome (i.e., recent thoughts of self-harm and suicidal ideation, lifetime suicidal ideation, and recent and lifetime suicide attempts) with gender discrimination, resilience and social support scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four classes of discrimination were obtained and named as \"low\", \"medium-low\", \"medium-high\", and \"high\". Higher levels of discrimination were associated with thoughts of self-harm and suicidal ideation (ORs from 1.26 to 2.39) and suicide attempt (ORs from 1.68 to 3.34), as well as lower levels of resilience (ORs from 1.79 to 4.08). On the other hand, higher levels of social support were associated with lower chances of thoughts of self-harm or suicidal ideation (ORs from 0.66 to 0.43) and suicide attempt (ORs from 0.78 to 0.58).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The clear link between discrimination, whether it be structural or interpersonal, and suicidal ideation found in this study calls for structural changes that address harassment in all forms against gender minorities.</p>","PeriodicalId":520767,"journal":{"name":"Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47626/1516-4446-2025-4329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Transgender individuals experience pervasive discrimination throughout their lives on both structural and interpersonal levels, greatly impacting on suicide risk. Gender-based discrimination can affect up to 96% of transgender individuals in Brazil, the country selected as the focus of this study.

Aims: To explore suicidal behaviour among transgender women by investigating the associations between resilience, social support, and experiences of gender discrimination and thoughts of self-harm, suicide ideation and suicide attempt among transgender women in Brazil.

Methods: This study draws from cross-sectional data from the Brazilian DIVAS study. A respondent-driven sampling method was used to recruit 2,470 participants. Fourteen experiences of discrimination were used in a latent class analysis model to separate the sample into classes. A multiple logistic regression model was used to assess the association of each outcome (i.e., recent thoughts of self-harm and suicidal ideation, lifetime suicidal ideation, and recent and lifetime suicide attempts) with gender discrimination, resilience and social support scores.

Results: Four classes of discrimination were obtained and named as "low", "medium-low", "medium-high", and "high". Higher levels of discrimination were associated with thoughts of self-harm and suicidal ideation (ORs from 1.26 to 2.39) and suicide attempt (ORs from 1.68 to 3.34), as well as lower levels of resilience (ORs from 1.79 to 4.08). On the other hand, higher levels of social support were associated with lower chances of thoughts of self-harm or suicidal ideation (ORs from 0.66 to 0.43) and suicide attempt (ORs from 0.78 to 0.58).

Conclusions: The clear link between discrimination, whether it be structural or interpersonal, and suicidal ideation found in this study calls for structural changes that address harassment in all forms against gender minorities.

性别歧视、弹性和社会支持与巴西跨性别妇女自我伤害和自杀的关系。
背景:跨性别者在生活中经历了普遍存在的结构性和人际层面的歧视,极大地影响了他们的自杀风险。在巴西,性别歧视可以影响到多达96%的跨性别者,巴西是本研究的重点国家。目的:通过调查巴西跨性别女性的复原力、社会支持、性别歧视经历、自残想法、自杀意念和自杀企图之间的关系,探讨跨性别女性的自杀行为。方法:本研究采用巴西DIVAS研究的横断面数据。采用受访者驱动的抽样方法,共招募2470名参与者。在潜在类别分析模型中使用了14个歧视经验来将样本划分为类别。采用多元logistic回归模型评估各结果(近期自残念头和自杀意念、终生自杀意念、近期和终生自杀企图)与性别歧视、心理韧性和社会支持得分的关系。结果:获得了“低”、“中低”、“中高”、“高”四个等级的歧视。较高水平的歧视与自残和自杀意念(比值从1.26到2.39)和自杀企图(比值从1.68到3.34)以及较低水平的恢复力(比值从1.79到4.08)相关。另一方面,较高的社会支持水平与较低的自残念头或自杀意念(比值从0.66到0.43)和自杀企图(比值从0.78到0.58)相关。结论:在这项研究中发现的歧视(无论是结构性的还是人际的)与自杀意念之间的明确联系,呼吁进行结构性改革,以解决针对性别少数群体的各种形式的骚扰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信