Pre-clinical studies investigating the combination of hypofractionated radiation with hyperthermia in a murine tumor and normal skin.

IF 3
Charlemagne A Folefac, Priyanshu M Sinha, Niels Bassler, Mateusz K Sitarz, Danny Mortensen, Morten Busk, Haibin Qian, Przemek M Krawczyk, Arlene L Oei, Pernille B Elming, Michael R Horsman
{"title":"Pre-clinical studies investigating the combination of hypofractionated radiation with hyperthermia in a murine tumor and normal skin.","authors":"Charlemagne A Folefac, Priyanshu M Sinha, Niels Bassler, Mateusz K Sitarz, Danny Mortensen, Morten Busk, Haibin Qian, Przemek M Krawczyk, Arlene L Oei, Pernille B Elming, Michael R Horsman","doi":"10.1080/02656736.2025.2545400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This preclinical study evaluated the effects of combining hypofractionated radiation (HFRT), either as X-ray photons or protons, with hyperthermia on tumor response and normal tissue damage in mice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The tumors were C3H mammary carcinomas implanted in the right rear foot of male CDF1 mice, while non-tumor-bearing mice were used to assess normal foot skin. HFRT was delivered in three fractions (5, 10, or 15 Gy) at 3 to 4-day intervals. Hyperthermia (40.5-42.5 °C) was applied once for 60 min, either 30, 90, or 180 min after the final radiation dose. Endpoints included tumor growth delay and moist skin desquamation. Mechanistic studies assessed DNA damage (γ-H2AX foci) 24 h after 3 × 10 Gy, with or without hyperthermia (42.5 °C for 1 h, administered 30 min post-RT), and tumor hypoxia (pimonidazole staining) measured 1 h after the last radiation fraction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Animals responded similarly to X-ray photons and protons in the tumor and skin. Hyperthermia enhanced the response to X-ray photons in both tissues, with temperature and time-interval dependency, showing the greatest effects at higher temperatures and shorter intervals. Protons combined with hyperthermia showed similar results, although with less decay in time-interval effects at 42.5 °C. DNA damage assessments revealed no significant difference between radiation types, but a significant enhancement was seen when tumors were heated at 42.5 °C. Tumor hypoxia was reduced after 3 × 10 Gy irradiation with either radiation type.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combining HFRT with hyperthermia yielded effects comparable to single-dose studies for both tumors and normal tissues. These responses were similar for both X-rays and protons.</p>","PeriodicalId":520653,"journal":{"name":"International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group","volume":"42 1","pages":"2545400"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2025.2545400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This preclinical study evaluated the effects of combining hypofractionated radiation (HFRT), either as X-ray photons or protons, with hyperthermia on tumor response and normal tissue damage in mice.

Methods: The tumors were C3H mammary carcinomas implanted in the right rear foot of male CDF1 mice, while non-tumor-bearing mice were used to assess normal foot skin. HFRT was delivered in three fractions (5, 10, or 15 Gy) at 3 to 4-day intervals. Hyperthermia (40.5-42.5 °C) was applied once for 60 min, either 30, 90, or 180 min after the final radiation dose. Endpoints included tumor growth delay and moist skin desquamation. Mechanistic studies assessed DNA damage (γ-H2AX foci) 24 h after 3 × 10 Gy, with or without hyperthermia (42.5 °C for 1 h, administered 30 min post-RT), and tumor hypoxia (pimonidazole staining) measured 1 h after the last radiation fraction.

Results: Animals responded similarly to X-ray photons and protons in the tumor and skin. Hyperthermia enhanced the response to X-ray photons in both tissues, with temperature and time-interval dependency, showing the greatest effects at higher temperatures and shorter intervals. Protons combined with hyperthermia showed similar results, although with less decay in time-interval effects at 42.5 °C. DNA damage assessments revealed no significant difference between radiation types, but a significant enhancement was seen when tumors were heated at 42.5 °C. Tumor hypoxia was reduced after 3 × 10 Gy irradiation with either radiation type.

Conclusions: Combining HFRT with hyperthermia yielded effects comparable to single-dose studies for both tumors and normal tissues. These responses were similar for both X-rays and protons.

临床前研究调查低分割辐射与热疗在小鼠肿瘤和正常皮肤的组合。
本临床前研究评估了低分割辐射(HFRT),无论是x射线光子还是质子,结合热疗对小鼠肿瘤反应和正常组织损伤的影响。方法:CDF1雄性小鼠右后脚植入C3H型乳腺癌,非荷瘤小鼠正常足部皮肤评估。HFRT以3 - 4天为间隔,分3次(5、10或15 Gy)递送。热疗(40.5-42.5°C)一次,持续60分钟,在最终放射剂量后30、90或180分钟。终点包括肿瘤生长延迟和湿润皮肤脱屑。机制研究评估3 × 10 Gy后24小时DNA损伤(γ-H2AX灶),有或没有热疗(42.5°C 1小时,放疗后30分钟给药),并在最后一次放疗后1小时测量肿瘤缺氧(吡咪唑染色)。结果:动物对肿瘤和皮肤中的x射线光子和质子的反应相似。高温增强了两种组织对x射线光子的反应,与温度和时间间隔有关,在较高的温度和较短的时间间隔下效果最大。质子联合热疗显示了类似的结果,尽管在42.5°C时时间间隔效应的衰减较小。DNA损伤评估显示,不同辐射类型之间没有显著差异,但当肿瘤在42.5°C下加热时,DNA损伤显著增强。3 × 10 Gy辐照后肿瘤缺氧程度均有所降低。结论:HFRT联合热疗对肿瘤和正常组织的效果与单剂量研究相当。对于x射线和质子,这些反应是相似的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信