{"title":"Impact of Aortic Atherosclerosis on Clinical Outcomes After Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement","authors":"Yoshinori Shirai, Akihito Tanaka, Yoshiyuki Tokuda, Hiroki Kondo, Koji Mizutani, Tomonari Uemura, Kenji Furusawa, Masato Mutsuga, Toyoaki Murohara","doi":"10.1002/ccd.70125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Aortic atherothrombotic lesions can cause systemic embolization and adverse outcomes after interventional procedures.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to assess the association between the degree of aortic atherosclerosis and clinical outcomes after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This single-center observational study included data from 278 patients who underwent transfemoral TAVR. The degree of aortic atherosclerosis in the ascending aorta, aortic arch, descending aorta, and abdominal aorta according to preoperative enhanced computed tomography was evaluated, and extensive intimal thickening ≥ 4 mm or mobile-looking, ulcerated or protruding atheroma were considered to be atherothrombotic lesions. Patients were classified into two groups: those with and without atherothrombotic lesions. Clinical outcomes, including all-cause death, stroke, systemic embolization, and worsening renal function, were investigated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 278 patients, 116 (41.4%) exhibited atherothrombotic lesions. Baseline renal function was significantly worse in patients with atherothrombotic lesions. There were no significant differences in the occurrence of all-cause death (0% vs. 0.6%; <i>p</i> > 0.99), stroke (3.5% vs. 2.5%; <i>p</i> = 0.72), systemic embolism (0.9% vs. 0%; <i>p</i> = 0.42), and worsening renal function (increase in serum creatinine ≥ 0.3 mg/dL or ≥ 1.5-fold from baseline; 5.4% vs. 5.2%; <i>p</i> = 0.93) within 1-month. During a median follow-up of 3.0 years (interquartile range 2.0–4.0 years), the occurrence of all-cause death was numerically higher in patients with atherothrombotic lesions compared to those without.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Atherothrombotic lesions were commonly observed in patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR. No significant clinical effect of aortic atherosclerosis on short-term adverse outcomes was observed, although long-term mortality was numerically higher in patients who exhibited atherothrombotic lesions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":"106 4","pages":"2661-2667"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccd.70125","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Aortic atherothrombotic lesions can cause systemic embolization and adverse outcomes after interventional procedures.
Aims
This study aimed to assess the association between the degree of aortic atherosclerosis and clinical outcomes after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).
Methods
This single-center observational study included data from 278 patients who underwent transfemoral TAVR. The degree of aortic atherosclerosis in the ascending aorta, aortic arch, descending aorta, and abdominal aorta according to preoperative enhanced computed tomography was evaluated, and extensive intimal thickening ≥ 4 mm or mobile-looking, ulcerated or protruding atheroma were considered to be atherothrombotic lesions. Patients were classified into two groups: those with and without atherothrombotic lesions. Clinical outcomes, including all-cause death, stroke, systemic embolization, and worsening renal function, were investigated.
Results
Of 278 patients, 116 (41.4%) exhibited atherothrombotic lesions. Baseline renal function was significantly worse in patients with atherothrombotic lesions. There were no significant differences in the occurrence of all-cause death (0% vs. 0.6%; p > 0.99), stroke (3.5% vs. 2.5%; p = 0.72), systemic embolism (0.9% vs. 0%; p = 0.42), and worsening renal function (increase in serum creatinine ≥ 0.3 mg/dL or ≥ 1.5-fold from baseline; 5.4% vs. 5.2%; p = 0.93) within 1-month. During a median follow-up of 3.0 years (interquartile range 2.0–4.0 years), the occurrence of all-cause death was numerically higher in patients with atherothrombotic lesions compared to those without.
Conclusions
Atherothrombotic lesions were commonly observed in patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR. No significant clinical effect of aortic atherosclerosis on short-term adverse outcomes was observed, although long-term mortality was numerically higher in patients who exhibited atherothrombotic lesions.
期刊介绍:
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.