Practice Effects and Long Delays: A Case Report Exploring a Novel Approach to Detecting Accelerated Long-Term Forgetting.

IF 2.1
Chris Gaskell, Cleo Keeling-Ball, Callum Furniss, Jonathan Evans
{"title":"Practice Effects and Long Delays: A Case Report Exploring a Novel Approach to Detecting Accelerated Long-Term Forgetting.","authors":"Chris Gaskell, Cleo Keeling-Ball, Callum Furniss, Jonathan Evans","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acaf077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Accelerated Long-Term Forgetting (ALF) is when newly learned information \"decays\" faster than expected over an extended period and is associated with temporal-lobe epilepsy (TLE). There is no well-established method for assessing ALF despite its apparent prevalence. We hypothesized that evidencing an absence of practice effects may represent an effective approach to detecting ALF. We sought to determine if this method, along with the long-delay memory tests, could evidence ALF in a single case.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We present a 66-year-old male with TLE who had memory complaints despite a stable memory profile over 4 years. Memory tests that employ a short (20-30 min) and a long delay (4 days) condition were used to assess forgetting, whereas repeatedly administered tests were used to detect practice effects. We anticipated poorer memory performance on the long versus short-delay test condition and a lack of improvement on memory tests that were repeated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For repeat administration tests, there was a marked score increase, indicating practice effects, for verbal and visual domains. For long delay tests, however, there was a notable drop with retention falling in the exceptionally low range.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest a dissociation between long delay and serial assessment tasks for detecting ALF.</p>","PeriodicalId":520564,"journal":{"name":"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaf077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Accelerated Long-Term Forgetting (ALF) is when newly learned information "decays" faster than expected over an extended period and is associated with temporal-lobe epilepsy (TLE). There is no well-established method for assessing ALF despite its apparent prevalence. We hypothesized that evidencing an absence of practice effects may represent an effective approach to detecting ALF. We sought to determine if this method, along with the long-delay memory tests, could evidence ALF in a single case.

Method: We present a 66-year-old male with TLE who had memory complaints despite a stable memory profile over 4 years. Memory tests that employ a short (20-30 min) and a long delay (4 days) condition were used to assess forgetting, whereas repeatedly administered tests were used to detect practice effects. We anticipated poorer memory performance on the long versus short-delay test condition and a lack of improvement on memory tests that were repeated.

Results: For repeat administration tests, there was a marked score increase, indicating practice effects, for verbal and visual domains. For long delay tests, however, there was a notable drop with retention falling in the exceptionally low range.

Conclusions: These findings suggest a dissociation between long delay and serial assessment tasks for detecting ALF.

练习效果和长时间延迟:一个案例报告探索一种检测加速长期遗忘的新方法。
目的:加速长期遗忘(ALF)是指新学习的信息在较长时间内比预期更快地“衰退”,与颞叶癫痫(TLE)有关。尽管ALF明显普遍存在,但尚无行之有效的评估方法。我们假设,证明缺乏实践效应可能是检测ALF的有效方法。我们试图确定这种方法,以及长延迟记忆测试,是否可以在单一情况下证明ALF。方法:我们报告了一名66岁的男性TLE患者,尽管他的记忆状况稳定了4年,但他仍然有记忆抱怨。记忆测试采用短时间(20-30分钟)和长时间延迟(4天)的条件来评估遗忘,而反复进行的测试用于检测练习的效果。我们预计在长延迟测试条件下与短延迟测试条件下的内存性能较差,并且在重复的内存测试中缺乏改进。结果:在重复给药测试中,语言和视觉领域的得分明显提高,表明练习效果。然而,对于长时间延迟测试,有一个显著的下降,保留率下降在非常低的范围内。结论:这些发现表明,在检测ALF时,长时间延迟和连续评估任务之间存在分离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信